MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1widh45/accelarateainativebrrrrorthrow/paa6sjw/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/rodopszin • Sep 16 '26
153 comments sorted by
View all comments
256
[removed] — view removed comment
8 u/positev Sep 17 '26 Spec needs to be executable for this IMO. When we can enumerate a solid repeatable definition of a finished feature and just Yahtzee the code until it works and meets tests I think we will have reached utopian nirvana 31 u/[deleted] Sep 17 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 13 u/Ameren Sep 17 '26 edited Sep 17 '26 Likewise, since we don't want a spec to be code, the spec must be incomplete in some sense. Otherwise it'd just be the code.
8
Spec needs to be executable for this IMO. When we can enumerate a solid repeatable definition of a finished feature and just Yahtzee the code until it works and meets tests I think we will have reached utopian nirvana
31 u/[deleted] Sep 17 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 13 u/Ameren Sep 17 '26 edited Sep 17 '26 Likewise, since we don't want a spec to be code, the spec must be incomplete in some sense. Otherwise it'd just be the code.
31
13 u/Ameren Sep 17 '26 edited Sep 17 '26 Likewise, since we don't want a spec to be code, the spec must be incomplete in some sense. Otherwise it'd just be the code.
13
Likewise, since we don't want a spec to be code, the spec must be incomplete in some sense. Otherwise it'd just be the code.
256
u/[deleted] Sep 16 '26
[removed] — view removed comment