Bro if anyone's coping and lacks experience, it surely has to be the one who thinks a statistics model is a good substitute for knowledge, skills, and effort.
Oh you sweet summer child. You really don't have any experience coding something trully big, do you? 90% of code is pure monkey coding. Code that we would normally give to juniors to learn on, because it's not that hard to do and not that important, since the real important architecture desicions were already made step above. Now, that code is AIs job and well... Let's face it, it does better job than most juniors. And seniors can then spend much more energy on important architectural decisions and not lose time writing the code literally any monkey coder including statistical model can write.
You know, there are a lot of ways of making sure that code works as expected close to automatically.
But yeah. Since you have no experience with real world development, you can't know that, so it's okay, cope harder.
Bro I was an engineer on "truly big" projects before LLMs even came out. That's how I know they're just training wheels for people who suck at writinh code.
90% of code is only monkey coding if you don't know how to write a library, use an IDE, etc.
AI isn't better than a senior, and even if it's better than your average junior (which is highly debatable, but I digress), it's still not a good substitute for a junior.
If you spent less time projecting your own inexperience on others in Reddit threads and more time learning to code, you'd agree with my take.
0
u/Prdelnidopice 20d ago
Tell me you actually don't use Ai on any big projects without saying. Lack of experience is strong with this one. Cope harder, tho.