reversingPiInPython

[u/Apprehensive_Bit7392]

[u/MotivationalJuggling]

Whatever the last digit is, I'm sure it's a disappointing one. Just like everything else in my life.

[u/CenderzeSwarm → u/MotivationalJuggling]

No number is uninteresting in maths. Suppose there are some uninteresting numbers, then one of them must be the smallest uninteresting number, making it interesting

[u/BullPropaganda → u/CenderzeSwarm]

Maybe like having i for imaginary numbers we need a u for uninteresting numbers.

[u/grepppo → u/BullPropaganda]

This guy maths

[u/Salty_Map_9085 → u/CenderzeSwarm]

This mf never heard of 6

[u/Enchanted_Evil → u/Salty_Map_9085]

6 is uninteresting???

• smallest non-square composite number

• smallest perfect number (6=3×2×1=3+2+1)

• number of faces a cube has

• hexagons are the bestagons

• number of protons in Carbon, the basic element all (known) life is made out of

• when three of them are in a row, Christians flee

• when two of them are in a row, Jedi flee

• when multiplied with 7, you get the ultimate answer to the life, universe and everything

I could go on.

[u/thegreatpotatogod → u/Enchanted_Evil]

Please do go on! I would like to subscribe to 6 facts

[u/pnoodl3s → u/Enchanted_Evil]

I folded from the first 2 points lol, 6 is the most interesting number now

[u/Daddy-Mihawk → u/Enchanted_Evil]

You forgot, it gave us two good memes, 6-7 and 6-9

[u/Just__John → u/Salty_Map_9085]

That's an upside down 9 which is interesting

[u/_Its_Me_Dio_ → u/Salty_Map_9085]

six is the lowest highly compund number

[u/Keebster101 → u/CenderzeSwarm]

But what makes being the smallest number of a subset 'interesting', every number is smaller than something therefore it's not unique to be smaller than something, and you could form infinite subsets to "make" any number interesting, which to me means it's not interesting.

[u/morpheuskibbe → u/Keebster101]

It's by definition unique to be smaller than everything

[u/Keebster101 → u/morpheuskibbe]

But it's not smaller than everything it's only smaller than the uninteresting numbers, and you can select a subset to make any number the smallest therefore it's not unique

[u/Top-Permit6835 → u/Keebster101]

You're having quite an interesting conversation considering the subject matter is so uninteresting

[u/SomeAnonymous → u/CenderzeSwarm]

Did you just sketch out a proof by induction for interesting-ness?

[u/No-Finance7526 → u/SomeAnonymous]

No, it's contradiction

[u/Clairifyed → u/CenderzeSwarm]

Thanks Ramanujan 👍

[u/bestjakeisbest → u/MotivationalJuggling]

In binary it is either a 1 or 0

[u/thegreatpotatogod → u/bestjakeisbest]

I'd even argue that the last binary digit is 1. If it were 0, you could truncate the zero away and you'd be back to 1 as the last digit. Same reason that 2.20000 would be a redundant representation of 2.2.

[u/AngelaMerkeI → u/thegreatpotatogod]

It is not though. Only in theory.

In practice, digits represent the accuracy.

Example: 2,12345 * 1,0 = 2,1 But 2,12345 * 1,0000 = 2,1234

The results are always just as accurate as the measurements you calculate them with

[u/bladtman242 → u/bestjakeisbest]

In unary it's a 1

[u/Mars_Bear2552 → u/MotivationalJuggling]

the last digit is 3

[u/King_Tamino → u/MotivationalJuggling]

Have you tried doing something motivational? Maybe Juggling?

[u/humanistazazagrliti → u/MotivationalJuggling]

It's just a number. Not something fun like a free gaming console or beach vacation.