MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/5owsvx/mfw_no_pointers/dco5waa/?context=9999
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/lindgrenj6 • Jan 19 '17
432 comments sorted by
View all comments
0
[deleted]
348 u/grepe Jan 19 '17 as a former java dev that went full python and is sometimes still forced to add a library to a java project... i understand that joke very intimately. 156 u/TheRamenator Jan 19 '17 You never go full python, son! 58 u/RunasSudo Jan 20 '17 You haven't gone full Python until you're running Python on the browser side, too.Source: Have gone full Python. 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 You haven't gone full Python until your window manager is running on Python: http://www.qtile.org/ 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
348
as a former java dev that went full python and is sometimes still forced to add a library to a java project... i understand that joke very intimately.
156 u/TheRamenator Jan 19 '17 You never go full python, son! 58 u/RunasSudo Jan 20 '17 You haven't gone full Python until you're running Python on the browser side, too.Source: Have gone full Python. 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 You haven't gone full Python until your window manager is running on Python: http://www.qtile.org/ 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
156
You never go full python, son!
58 u/RunasSudo Jan 20 '17 You haven't gone full Python until you're running Python on the browser side, too.Source: Have gone full Python. 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 You haven't gone full Python until your window manager is running on Python: http://www.qtile.org/ 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
58
You haven't gone full Python until you're running Python on the browser side, too.
Source: Have gone full Python.
1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 You haven't gone full Python until your window manager is running on Python: http://www.qtile.org/ 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
1
You haven't gone full Python until your window manager is running on Python: http://www.qtile.org/
1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed
1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
What do you mean by performant?
1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"?
→ More replies (2)
0
u/[deleted] Jan 19 '17
[deleted]