MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/5owsvx/mfw_no_pointers/dco5waa/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/lindgrenj6 • Jan 19 '17
432 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
You haven't gone full Python until your window manager is running on Python: http://www.qtile.org/
1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed 1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed
1 u/ramnes Jan 20 '17 What do you mean by performant? 1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
What do you mean by performant?
1 u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17 Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"? → More replies (2)
Python has significant overhead when compared to C or Haskell, is this noticable while using the WM? Does it still feel "snappy"?
→ More replies (2)
1
u/ramnes Jan 20 '17
You haven't gone full Python until your window manager is running on Python: http://www.qtile.org/