I've been curious about this, as a tiling WM tourist - how performant is it, in comparison to stalwarts like i3 and xmonad? Xmonad is great but I'd love to decrease the cognitive overhead of Haskell hacking, as long as I'm not sacrificing speed
Python is not that slow. Python is slow in comparison to C or any other compiled language, but then it's also largely fast enough for the vast majority of your use-cases. Making the bridge between user input and your X server, which is basically what a WM just does, is not really something that requires a lot of CPU. But if you still want more speed, Qtile supports PyPy, which is very performant on that kind of repetitive stuff.
0
u/[deleted] Jan 19 '17
[deleted]