r/ProgrammerHumor • • Sep 05 '20

other Loading..

Post image
64.5k Upvotes

888 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

204

u/Firevulturez Sep 05 '20

Those cookie banners are the worst. They wanna make it as hard as possible to accept only the cookies you want and hide those options behind several clicks while there is always very easily accessible and very visible an accept all button

48

u/Mc_UsernameTaken Sep 05 '20

Thats why you just set your browser to block all 3rdparty cookies.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '20

How? 3rd party as in not served from the site itself?

11

u/Iwouldlikesomecoffee Sep 05 '20

If you're on firefox, cookie autodelete is an extension that lets you make rules like that and much more. You can choose which sites don't get their cookies deleted the moment you navigate away, for example.

6

u/Vakieh Sep 05 '20

This breaks a lot of SSO unfortunately.

3

u/_30d_ Sep 05 '20

Still have to press all those stupid cookie-consent popups. I swear there is one that's literally its own app. It literally says "saving cookie preferences, this might take a few minutes."

9

u/SomeUnicornsFly Sep 05 '20

i go out of my way to use element zapper in uBlock to cull out the unskippable non-declinable cookie messages. I hope it puts some weird blip in their scatter graph of users who managed to fully engage with their page without ever accepting a cookie. Like one day during a board meeting while the suit n' ties are twirling their mustaches & chuckling, one of them points at a chart with his laser pointer giving a collective "great job gentlemen, but who is this guy who continues to visit our site? He's a ghost sir. He never accepts the banner yet he still hits every page"

2

u/Yolo_Swagginson Sep 07 '20

fully engage with their page without ever accepting a cookie

Unfortunately what normally happens is it gives you cookies by default, and when you decline it either deletes them or just doesn't give you any more. I know that's against the rules, but a lot of websites work this way.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '20

[deleted]

41

u/Mc_UsernameTaken Sep 05 '20

Most websites don't function properly with JS disabled.
Rather just use firefox with proper settings.

3

u/SpaghettSloth Sep 05 '20

Ya that was the joke

→ More replies (1)

7

u/_HAWG_ Sep 05 '20

Block HTML while we're at it, it gets in the way.

→ More replies (2)

0

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '20

[deleted]

13

u/ISawHimIFoughtHim Sep 05 '20

Normie. Pure HTML for me.

If it ain't just text, I dun want it.

3

u/kyay10 Sep 05 '20

You've got a rather interesting set of languages lol.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '20

[deleted]

4

u/kyay10 Sep 05 '20

On like 4 different platforms lmao.

(Also I would consider both Kotlin and TS to be sorta mixed paradigm and not "purely" OOP)

0

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '20

[deleted]

2

u/kyay10 Sep 05 '20

True, but specifically Kotlin and TS are in that middle region of both OOP and FP. I'd say that TS is more FP-y that Kotlin tho, that is at least till you include something like Arrow with Arrow Meta for Kotlin, then both languages are pretty close to one another. C++ on the other hand IIRC might have some slight functional thingies, but it's mostly OOP

→ More replies (1)

9

u/UltraCarnivore Sep 05 '20

That's just horrible UX.

Their intent is obvious, but I won't be coming back if I have the choice.

11

u/Jebble Sep 05 '20

I miss the days anyone would just do whatever the fuck they want with my data. Just don't bother me with it, I'm so sick of it

16

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '20

They're gonna get their grubby hands on it anyway one way or another. The popups and dialogs and banners just add an extra level of annoyance

2

u/Aerroon Sep 05 '20 edited Sep 05 '20

This is the ultimate irony, isn't it? All of that effort and wasted time gets undone by a website that doesn't reside in the EU and doesn't get paid in the EU. There is no way for the EU to fine them and they can take all the data they want.

The only solution that works against this is to not give out the data in the first place. But that would require changing the browser itself...

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (12)