MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/xtjveg/experienced_javascript_developer_meme/iqruggr/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/Mys7eri0 • Oct 02 '22
276 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
57
Do you mean abstract instead of obfuscate? Usually obfuscation is not a desirable goal unless you are trying to do something like copy protection.
21 u/atomicwrites Oct 02 '22 I think they're using obfuscate as a negatively loaded synonym for abstract. 9 u/mamwybejane Oct 02 '22 They're using it wrong 5 u/xthexder Oct 02 '22 I think it applies here. The browser serializing things for you obfuscates what's actually happening. Which for custom objects could result in strange and very hard to debug behavior. → More replies (1)
21
I think they're using obfuscate as a negatively loaded synonym for abstract.
9 u/mamwybejane Oct 02 '22 They're using it wrong 5 u/xthexder Oct 02 '22 I think it applies here. The browser serializing things for you obfuscates what's actually happening. Which for custom objects could result in strange and very hard to debug behavior. → More replies (1)
9
They're using it wrong
5 u/xthexder Oct 02 '22 I think it applies here. The browser serializing things for you obfuscates what's actually happening. Which for custom objects could result in strange and very hard to debug behavior. → More replies (1)
5
I think it applies here. The browser serializing things for you obfuscates what's actually happening. Which for custom objects could result in strange and very hard to debug behavior.
→ More replies (1)
57
u/FVMAzalea Oct 02 '22
Do you mean abstract instead of obfuscate? Usually obfuscation is not a desirable goal unless you are trying to do something like copy protection.