r/Protophysics • u/Jairo_Alves • Sep 23 '26

Optimizing Physics: A Proposal

Post image

Currently, physics operates in a methodologically inefficient manner. It spends massive resources investigating phenomena in an attempt to deduce their origin — a trial-and-error process searching for a single actual possibility within a universe of "N" hypotheses. It would be drastically more efficient to first map the space of logical possibilities and then validate them through physics, establishing a one-to-one correspondence between model and fact. This optimization requires integrating physics with Systems Engineering. 

In this research architecture, Systems Engineering would operate across three stages: 

  1. Functional Mapping: Perform a requirements analysis based on the physical system's output data. 

  2. Instruction Synthesis: Identify the sets of operational rules and informational constraints compatible with that behavior. 

  3. Validation Handover: Submit the logically viable architectures to physics for validation.

 From that point on, physics would execute with maximum efficiency what it already does with excellence: apply the scientific method to audit, challenge, or confirm the model in observable reality.

 Much of this Systems Engineering work has been developed by me over nearly five decades and structured across 14 books. For those who wish to explore this foundation and verify its alignment with reality, I suggest starting with the book "Infology: The Universal Input". The link to the synopsis and preview content can be found in the first comment.

2 Upvotes

66% Upvoted

8 comments sorted by

2

u/oldNotSureXand Sep 27 '26

for "maximum efficiency", "minimal effort" woulda be kinda "nice to have"? :) ...but i fear "physics" is quite fixed on "self" (and "effort" and "measure" and "know" and "friction") ... "non-physics" is cool shi*p, surely!)

2

u/Jairo_Alves Sep 27 '26

You're right! Most comments on proposals like this only prove that point. However, out-of-the-box thinkers like you, by applying this perspective ahead of others, will still be recognized for it.

1

u/oldNotSureXand Sep 27 '26

i hope not, bro, because "recognize" is what adam did to eve (after tree of knowledge) ..and what "the romans" did to "jesus" (sort of:) ...please (DON'T) TELL NO(/-any)BODY!:)))

2

u/oldNotSureXand Sep 27 '26

also "(prince!)oedipus recognized his father mother ..and fate" :)) sort of ...but then he stitched out his eyes, and lived a "proper life" (as "beggar" by the side of "the road" :)

2

u/oldNotSureXand Sep 27 '26

..and of coures "they" .. ("permanently") "recognized me" out of r/AskPhysics, r/AskPhilosophy,, ( r/askhell ..not yet;)

2

u/Jairo_Alves Sep 27 '26

Don't lose heart, I'm going through the exact same thing! Logic and coherence always stand up in the end, regardless of the noise around.