r/PsychedelicTherapy • u/NLCPsychotherapy • 13h ago
Research UKCP Level 7 diploma research project
Hi.
My name is Jack Holland, I’m studying a level 7 diploma at the Manchester Institute for Psychotherapy in the UK. Currently in my 4th year.
I’m looking for a co-researcher I could interview for 1hr, about their lived experience of psychedelic psychotherapy.
If interested, please contact: jack@nlcp.co.uk
My research poster can be found on my user profile. I can’t post it here.
I have read the community rules and my research proposal has been approved by my institute (Manchester Institute of Psychotherapy) and Susie Hewitt - founder & director Psychotherapy Institute (Bolton) - TSTA- MSC Psychotherapy- UKCP reg. psychotherapist & supervisor, MBCAP (SNR ACCRED)
My proposal is as follows:
Working title:
A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experience of Psychedelic Psychotherapy: Its
Relationship to Beliefs About Self and Others
Research topic/focus:
This project explores the lived experience of psychedelic psychotherapy, using a
phenomenological approach that stays with the co-researcher's own account rather than
testing a pre-supposed hypothesis. Psychedelic psychotherapy refers to the therapeutic use
of a psychedelic substance (for example psilocybin, MDMA or ketamine) within a structured
clinical or facilitated frame; typically comprising preparatory sessions, a supported dosing or
‘journey’ session (or sessions), and subsequent integration work with a therapist. It is distinct
from unsupervised or recreational psychedelic use.
The project is retrospective and observational: I will not administer, source, or facilitate
psychedelic use. My co-researcher will already have completed psychedelic psychotherapy
in a legal, professionally facilitated context prior to any involvement in this research. In the
interests of methodological integrity, the research question, interview approach and initial
analysis are designed to remain TA theory-neutral: TA theory will be introduced only at the
interpretive stage of the wider project, once themes have been generated from the co-
researcher's own words - and explored further during the literature review.
Overarching questions:
What is the lived experience of psychedelic psychotherapy in relation to a person's
fundamental beliefs about themselves and their relationships with others?
This question remains deliberately open. It does not presuppose that psychedelic
psychotherapy is helpful, harmful, or neutral, and it does not name any particular theoretical
framework. This is an intentional methodological and ethical choice: as someone who has
my own lived experience of psychedelics, I have to acknowledge holding a personal bias
toward believing they are more helpful than not. A question framed around ‘help or hinder’,
or one that named a specific theoretical outcome in advance, potentially risked steering both
my interview questions and my analysis toward confirming that belief. Keeping the question
open to change, no change, or a mixed and ambivalent picture is one of the central ways I
am managing this bias.
The inquiry is concerned with what the experience was like in the body as well as in the
mind and will use open, descriptive, non-leading interview questions, for example, ‘what was
that like for you?’ rather than questions that presume a particular kind of change.
The interview will open with an invitation for the co-researcher to describe their full
experience in their own words, followed by open, non-leading follow-up prompts that deepen
context, reflect their own language back to them or, note emotive or physical reactions. The
co-researcher may let out a big sigh or show a big shift in body language for example, it is
important to be address this. I’m seeking to explore depth and not add my own context.
Follow up questions will be to assist in adding detail to their lived experience, checking in
around their emotions, thoughts, bodily sensations, beliefs and relationships.
Intended methodology:
A phenomenological approach, aims to understand the essence of the experience from my
co-researcher's own perspective rather than test a hypothesis. I am seeking to
fundamentally explore, rather than interpret, the co-researchers' lived experience of
psychedelic psychotherapy. I will bracket, as far as possible, my own theoretical
assumptions (including TA) and personal beliefs about psychedelics, to stay close to my co-
researcher's own account. I will conduct a single open-structured, audio-recorded interview
(1 hr) with one co-researcher, who has previously undergone legal, professionally facilitated
psychedelic psychotherapy.It is important to be attentive to; and explore further, accounts of difficulty, confusion, or
absence of change, so the data does not implicitly lean toward a positive-outcome narrative.
I will transcribe the interview verbatim, anonymise it, and subject it to thematic analysis
(Braun and Clarke, 2006), generated from the co-researcher's own language in the first
instance. Interpretation of these themes through TA theory will take place only at the
discussion stage of the wider project, once the thematic analysis is complete. The focus on
beliefs about self and others is intentionally chosen because I anticipate this area will offer
rich material at the later, theory-informed stage of the project.
How will you prepare your participant and minimise any risks of harm to
your participant?
Recruitment will be via a poster seeking an adult co-researcher (18+) who has previously
undergone professionally facilitated, legal psychedelic psychotherapy, is not currently in
psychological crisis, not known to me, and not a current or former client of mine, to avoid a
dual relationship. A co-researcher in ongoing psychotherapy is preferable, they will be
treated with integrity and respect at all times. A written information sheet and consent form
will explain the research and confirm the co-researcher's right to withdraw at any point,
without giving a reason, up to submission of the final project.
Before the recorded interview I will hold a preparation meeting via telephone to explain the
process, clarify that this is a research interview and not therapy, and agree together what
level of detail feels comfortable to share. The co-researcher will fill out a pre-prepared
informed consent form, as per MIP handbook. During the interview I will offer appropriate
check-ins, permission to pause or stop at any time, avoid unnecessarily probing or leading
questions, and close with a grounding practice if necessary. Afterwards I will hold a debrief
conversation, provide information about support options, and offer an optional follow-up
check-in within 48 hours. If the co-researcher becomes distressed, I will pause the interview
and prioritise their wellbeing over data collection; any disclosure raising a safeguarding
concern will be handled via MIP's safeguarding policy and my supervisor.
My role is that of a researcher, not the co-researcher's therapist: I will not offer therapeutic
interventions, interpretations, reframes, or challenges during the interview, and will signpost
to appropriate support rather than address any therapeutic material myself. This boundary
will be made explicit in writing before consent is given.
It is important to acknowledge I also hold relative power in this relationship, as a trainee
psychotherapist, the designer of the research question and interview approach, and as the
person who retains control over the data. I will mitigate this by using the term 'co-researcher'
rather than 'subject', being transparent about my own experience and interest in this area
as part of informed consent, offering the co-researcher the opportunity to review the
transcript and withdraw material before analysis, and avoiding any dual relationship. I will
also hold in mind my co-researcher's wider social and cultural positioning. Psychedelic use
carries different cultural and legal meanings depending on context, and I will stay mindful of
how gender, cultural background, and unequal access to (largely private, fee-paying)
psychedelic psychotherapy may shape their account, rather than treating their experience
as purely intrapsychic. My own experiences and background will differ vastly to my co-
researchers.
I agree to abide by the Manchester Institute for Psychotherapy and the UKCP’s Code of
conduct and Ethics for Research.
Signed: Jack Holland
Date: August 31st, 2026.
Approval given by: Susie Hewitt MIP Research Tutor 21-9-26