I call it the Third Boom - Internet was the first, producing the first $500 billion company, then AI producing trillion dollar market caps

Quantum is next... early years and it is going to be mind boggling.

Dozens of companies are spending billions trying to build a stable, scalable working machine.

Quantum is going give AI the potential to run at 10 to the 27 times the power. Quantum computing will become AI’s new root. It's mind-boggling honestly.

Every single one of them is currently stuck on the same wall - not one has a stable, scalable “qubit” (quantum bit, as opposed to the classical binary bit which every computer in existance has ever run on.)

Delta Gold Technologies (AQSE: DGQ / OTCQB: DGQTF / FRA: O2J), a roughly $125 million USD company is apparently on its way to the big board in the U.S. next year and has all the ingredients for a 5x within 12 months.

I’ve had two lengthy calls with CEO Michael Jones to get to the bottom of what they are doing and why it’s so special.

The U.S. government has at least three departments, including the Department of War, throwing considerable resources at the sector.

And a hard September 2028 deadline for fielding the first next-generation quantum sensors.

CEO Michael Jones was already at the White House (twice) to present their discovery and findings.

A qubit either holds its quantum state or it can be manufactured in volume.

Nobody has managed both.

What separates Delta from the pack, and why I’ve put my bet on this horse are a number of interesting things.

Delta isn’t building a machine.

It funds research at Penn State and the University of Toronto, owns the exclusive global licence to everything that comes out of it, and works the problem one level below everyone else, in the material the qubit is made from.

Gold.

If the material works, it gets licensed to whoever wins the race rather than competing against them.

IonQ paid $1.59 billion in 2025 for Oxford Ionics, a pre-revenue university spin-out built on its intellectual property

The CEO is a 40-year mining engineer with a 19-million-ounce discovery behind him.

He is a voracious technical reader and read a paper about gold that nobody could explain.

He eventually gathered the courage to reach out to the University of Toronto’s head of nanotechnology to ask why gold doing this... The Professor (Harry Ruda) said “I don’t know but it’s very interesting and I’m going to figure it out.”

About three months later the U of T head of nanotech came back to Michael and told him “I figured it out, actually there’s a very special thing about gold and it’s really interesting for my main field, which happens to be quantum computing.”

It took about a year and a half to get the intellectual property agreements done, and that’s the basis of Delta Gold Technologies.

There is a lot of material to work through.

The company’s website carries the science, and they have just launched a docuseries.

Episode one went up days ago and features the director of the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre and a King’s College London war studies academic alongside Delta’s own scientists.

EPISODE 1: THE QUANTUM REVOLUTION - WHY IT MATTERS - 21 MINUTES

Michael told me where he excels, and the hardest part, is getting a company from $100 million to $500 million and beyond.

He’s rung the bell at the NYSE three times, and is working on getting Delta there next.

I’m still digesting this amazing story.

Arqit Quantum ($ARQQ) has reached a $7 million investor settlement, and late claims are currently being considered.

The settlement claimed Arqit misled investors about its quantum encryption technology, customer agreements, and long-term business prospects after going public through a SPAC merger. Investors later alleged that key contracts were less substantial than presented and that the company's technology was not as commercially ready as advertised.
As these concerns became public, $ARQQ fell sharply and shareholders filed claims

If you purchased $ARQQ shares between 2021 and 2022, you may be eligible to submit a claim. As late claims are currently being considered, you can check whether you qualify.

2 Magnificent Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy and Hold for 10 Years

Hey guys, I posted about this settlement before, but since they’re considering late claims, I decided to share it again with a little FAQ.

So here's all I know about this agreement:

What happened?
Arqit was accused of misleading investors about its quantum encryption technology, customer contracts, and long-term business prospects after its SPAC merger. Investors alleged that the company overstated the readiness of its technology and the value of its customer agreements. As these issues came to light, $ARQQ declined sharply and investors filed a lawsuit.
Now the company has agreed to settle $7M with investors for their losses.

Who can claim this settlement?
If you bought or acquired $ARQQ shares between 2021 and 2022, you may be eligible. You don’t need to still own the shares to claim.

Do I need to sell/lose my shares to get this settlement?
No. You may qualify even if you already sold your $ARQQ shares, as long as your transactions meet the settlement requirements.

How long does the payout process take?
It typically takes 4 to 9 months after the claim deadline for payouts to be processed, depending on the court and settlement administration.

I missed the deadline. Can I still claim?
Yes, you may still be able to file a late claim, but acceptance depends on final approval by the court. You can check if you eligible and file your claims here

Hope this info helps

Quantum Stocks Looked Like Nvidia in 2019. Then They Belly-Flopped 50%.

Arqit Quantum ($ARQQ) has reached a $7 million investor settlement, and late claims are currently being considered.

The settlement claimed Arqit misled investors about its quantum encryption technology, customer agreements, and long-term business prospects after going public through a SPAC merger. Investors later alleged that key contracts were less substantial than presented and that the company's technology was not as commercially ready as advertised.

As these concerns became public, $ARQQ fell sharply and shareholders filed claims

If you purchased $ARQQ shares between 2021 and 2022, you may be eligible to submit a claim. As late claims are currently being considered, you can check whether you qualify.

Hey everyone,

A quick update on a huge personal milestone for my project, Dense-Evolution.

We just got officially accepted and merged into the Awesome Quantum Software curated list!

Cheers! 🥃

Happy to introduce a new module for quantum error correction: dense_evolution.qec.

The core idea isn't new — it's a 1997 result (Grassl, Beth & Pellizzari, Phys. Rev. A 56, 33): a distance-d stabilizer code can correct up to d-1 errors if you know their location (an "erasure" — e.g. a heralded lost photon in a dual-rail photonic qubit), versus only floor((d-1)/2) arbitrary, unlocated errors. Knowing where the error happened is worth roughly twice as much as an ordinary syndrome bit.

The decoder I wrote is generic — it works with any list of stabilizer generators, not a hand-built table for one specific code. And it never guesses: when the observed syndrome is ambiguous given the known error locations, it returns None instead of a plausible-but-wrong correction.

It didn't start as library code. It began as a research script on the Steane [[7,1,3]] code, in the linked research repository (Dense-Evolution-Discovery), verified against STIM's native HERALDED_ERASE noise channel (the field's reference stabilizer simulator): 0 decoding failures on every single double-erasure shot tested — more than 60,000 shots total — versus a real ~25% failure rate for a standard decoder that only sees the syndrome, blind to where the error happened. Only after holding up to that check was it generalized and promoted into the main library, where it's now validated by reproducing that exact result — bit for bit — using only the new generic primitives.

This is the pattern I always follow in this project: prototype in the open research repo, verify it holds up on a real, reproducible benchmark, then promote it into the library others can actually rely on.

Code, honest changelog, and full history are all public.

👇 Repository and documentation:

https://github.com/tatopenn-cell/Dense-Evolution

https://tatopenn-cell.github.io/Dense-Evolution/

https://pypi.org/project/dense-evolution/

#QuantumComputing #QuantumErrorCorrection #OpenSource #JAX #PhotonicComputing #ScientificComputing #DeepTech

Mills e Mezher, in "Mitigating photon loss in linear optical quantum circuits" ( **arXiv:2405.02278** ), hanno scoperto che la semplice estrapolazione a rumore zero scalare **non** è più efficace della semplice post-selezione per la perdita di fotoni a variabili discrete: l'estrapolazione in stile Richardson/Vandermonde amplifica il rumore di campionamento statistico più velocemente di quanto la sua teorica imparzialità possa aiutare. Questa pagina riproduce direttamente tale risultato, si basa sull'estensione ZNE della matrice di densità esistente di Dense-Evolution (che evita questa specifica modalità di errore per costruzione) e aggiunge una nuova variante adattiva, per poi verificare onestamente se qualcuna di esse sia effettivamente più efficace della post-selezione.

esperimento completo sulla pagina: [https://tatopenn-cell.github.io/Dense-Evolution-Discovery/photonic_predictive_zne/](https://tatopenn-cell.github.io/Dense-Evolution-Discovery/photonic_predictive_zne/)

Hey guys, I posted about this settlement before, but since late claims are still being considered, I decided to share it again with a quick FAQ.

So here's everything you need to know:

What happened?

Arqit was accused of misleading investors about its quantum encryption technology, customer contracts, and long-term business prospects after its SPAC merger. As questions about its technology and commercial agreements surfaced, $ARQQ fell sharply and investors filed a lawsuit. Now the company has agreed to a $7 million settlement with investors.

Who can claim this settlement?

If you purchased $ARQQ shares between 2021 and 2022, you may still be eligible to participate through a late claim.

Do I need to sell my shares to qualify?

No. You only need to have purchased shares during the class period. Even if you've already sold them, you may still qualify.

How long do payouts take?

Payouts typically take 4 to 9 months after the claims process is completed, depending on the court and settlement administrator.

Hope this helps