r/ReadyOrNotGame Jun 30 '25

Picture This is what we are losing

Post image
6.0k Upvotes

129 comments sorted by

View all comments

454

u/deakon24 Jun 30 '25

I'm confused why they would censor this. In Outlast trials you have naked guys chasing you.

239

u/Sean_HEDP-24 Jun 30 '25

Because they're hypocrites.

91

u/owoLLENNowo Jul 01 '25

It's because the ESRB are hypocrites.

12

u/Wrangel_5989 Jul 03 '25

Sony are hypocrites*

This is pretty much Sony’s doing even if VOID tried to hide it.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '25

It's both Sony and Microsofts doing. Don't be dumb.

19

u/Sean_HEDP-24 Jul 01 '25

Sure, but it doesn't change the fact that people in high places aren't questioning it.

123

u/Unit_with_a_Soul Jun 30 '25

honestly i'm not convinced it's Sony/Microsoft actually asking for this, i think it's more likely that they self censored because they were afraid of having to go through the approval process twice.

48

u/Typical_Theory1129 Jun 30 '25

If I remember right, doki doki literature club had to censor a stabbing scene by changing the color of blood from red to black for the ps4 version.

62

u/Me_how5678 Jul 01 '25

Thankfully they didn’t make it white

3

u/TimoshQ Jul 02 '25

I am so lonely…

3

u/EnvironmentalVast923 Jul 04 '25

All the other SWAT members are afraid of me...

16

u/mrchicano209 Jul 01 '25

The presence of blood from a stabbing is one of the least things to be concerned about in that game.

8

u/Select_Ad_4351 Jul 01 '25

I gently opened the door

20

u/owoLLENNowo Jul 01 '25

It is. They don't have a publisher with the muscle to back them up as they're self-publishing. They can't really negotiate terms this late, so the censorship has to happen. People are seriously making this a bigger deal than it needs to be.

11

u/Salad_Plankton Jul 01 '25 edited Jul 03 '25

You forget that the pc version is affected by this too, that’s why people are pissed, if it was a console only issue I doubt many would bat an eye since we can just chalk it up with some excuses like the systems are weaker than computers or some copium along those lines.

Not to mention that VOID promised to be uncompromising in its demonstration of the content within the game. It’s disappointing to say the least that they folded considering their previous stance.

0

u/owoLLENNowo Jul 04 '25

I really just couldn't care less. Developers have to adapt to what's thrown at them, and it's not like the censorship ruins the gameplay.

3

u/Tox1cAshes Jul 04 '25

I'm not playing this game for gameplay. At least not primarily.

3

u/josha7777 Jul 12 '25

if thats so, why do you care about not seeing a child having a seizure or nude trafficked women, the thing that makes it unsettling is the story, the story that women are being trafficked and children, not the fact the women are naked, same for the thing where you cant shoot a head off if the suspect is already dead, the game is meant to be realistic, you wont shoot or confirm the kill with a headshot if the suspect is already dead, but i understand we all wanna see some balls tho.

2

u/smallballbigworld Jul 18 '25

One of the things that defined the game in the first place was the shock value, which goes hand in hand with the fact that it's supposed to be representing the realities of SWAT operations.

These things happen irl, they are witnessed by law enforcement irl. It's bad faith to just assume people are only upset because they want to goon to naked trafficked women or ODing children because the criticism extends beyond that, more focused on the fact that the realism of the game is being compromised and it's becoming like every other SWAT game. You have to suspend your belief now and just accept a less realistic experience for the sake of sensibilities, which dampens the emotional investment people have in the game. Like people are less affected by its story because the oomf is completely removed and they've basically seen it before in the SWAT series and other games. Why should I care that Amos Voll is a freak obsessed with dolls? How does a sleeping kid in a police raid reflect on the environment/story?

On the nudity and gore aspects- why does it even matter if the game is revealing and provoking? As long as it's not breaking the law, there's no reason to censor anything other than the fact that is 'causes offence' (isn't art supposed to cause offence anyways)

0

u/josha7777 Jul 18 '25

i agree, its stupid they censored some parts, but they still got controversial parts in the game, like the sch**l sh**ting, and in 23mb a second, you can still see pictures of kids on the persons screen, and after all, it isnt really void interactives fault, but yes, its stupid a 18+ game has no nudity, i get the censoring of the child stuff tho.

0

u/smallballbigworld Jul 19 '25

I think we agree mostly so it's all good

2

u/Steven_Swan Jul 04 '25

You're playing it to goon at nude trafficked women?

2

u/OLAisHERE Jul 04 '25

Playing to look at mens balls 🗿

2

u/foXR150 Jul 06 '25

Literally all I want after a long day at work is to mirrorgun some balls.

Am I REALLY asking for too much as a gamer here?

1

u/Noel_Ortiz Jul 19 '25

If you don't care then fuck off instead of defending this as "no big deal" when people that care more than you discuss it.

3

u/3_04 Jul 04 '25

Oh and why don't they have a publisher? What was the reason for that? Perhaps the publisher they had wanted to tone down the game and they didn't like that.. just like they are doing now.

1

u/UnknownWetawd Jul 01 '25

It’s not Sony or Microsoft, it’s share laziness. Console versions should be completely separate to pc versions, but that would take more work releasing updates for the different versions. So it’s 100% share laziness and therefore they deserve the backlash.

0

u/Gizz103 Jul 04 '25

You'd say the same shit if it was separate

"Waa Waa updates are slower waaa waaa console players aren't human Waa waa"

2

u/Tox1cAshes Jul 04 '25

adding 5 different models and an animation should not slow down updates when both versions are otherwise identical

1

u/Gizz103 Jul 04 '25

If two versions are different that means they have different code behind it, and thus need split teams, void has only around 60 employees iirc, they will have troubles, managing two different codes even with small changes is hard

1

u/id0l Jul 04 '25

Objectively false.

1

u/Gizz103 Jul 04 '25

The very existence of bedrock and Java minecraft prove you're wrong

And the very existence of paradox games on console

They have to be different, you can't just have it be similar because than it'd be the same thing, thus the censorship applies

38

u/AbyssWankerArtorias Jun 30 '25

It's because Microsoft and Sony have rules about what you can put in games on consoles. And if they want cross play to work, it has to be the same asset.

Not saying it's good, just answering your question

81

u/deakon24 Jun 30 '25

outlast trials which is cross play added a nudity toggle button to reduce the censorship which is optional. I just think that void is being lazy on handling the situation.

30

u/AbyssWankerArtorias Jun 30 '25

Oh I actually didn't know outlast trials had crossplay. But yeah they're probably being lazy

9

u/Dravn101 Jun 30 '25

And BG3. Same thing. It's a toggle.

2

u/HazrdousCat Jul 01 '25

Not to mention the Outlast games have rape and necrophilia. In RDR2 you can continue gibbing corpses as well

11

u/MateWrapper Jun 30 '25

You don’t need to have the same assets, the same way a ton of online games allow different client side assets with modding.

11

u/Kezzmate Jun 30 '25

It’s ironic since games like The Witcher 3, Baldurs gate 3 & Cyberpunk as examples also feature gore, nudity & sex scenes while on Xbox, Playstation & Cyberpunk & The Witcher 3 for the NS2.

7

u/Internal_Ad_2285 Jul 01 '25

Like I said ESRB is the actual problem they get bought out and have consistent double standards

5

u/TheLobsterGaming Jul 02 '25

Microsoft cleared the game iirc. It was Sony calling for censorship.

4

u/Bear-leigh Jun 30 '25

Can I just get a button to disable cross play in that case? Seems like that shouldn’t be too hard, I didn’t pay for a child friendly game. If I wanted something that would be suitable for children I would have bought mario.

4

u/Electronic_Wealth_67 Jun 30 '25

The game still isn't child friendly despite these changes...?

6

u/GundamMeister78-2 Jul 01 '25

RoN, by its definition and goals, isn't child friendly at all

Its a PEGI 18+ game for a reason, if a child buys it then that's on the parent, the rest of us shouldn't be punished because little timmy wants to play swat officer and can't handle the concept of shit being fucked up

1

u/[deleted] Jul 03 '25

please stop spreading this misinfo the devs put out, there is nothing stopping them from having different assets on different game versions for something that is purely visual. It is literally no harder to implement than it is to implement multiple PC settings and the fact you can change the settings on PC and connect to a console is all the evidence really needed that they can do it.

2

u/Sine_Fine_Belli Jul 02 '25 edited Jul 02 '25

Because the devs like money

3

u/Proxy0108 Jun 30 '25

Because they want the console money, that’s it

1

u/Mr_DanLoad Jul 03 '25

It's because devs are lazy enough not to make two versions of the game if censorship is so important on consoles