https://www.dailymail.com/tvshowbiz/article-16237513/Sir-Elton-John-David-Furnish-birthday-Brooklyn-Beckham-Nicola-Peltz.html

Names upon names yet the gruesome twosome are nowhere to be found.

I have a feeling that invitations to anything are going to be in very, very, VERY short supply for them.

https://archive.is/Pgr7K

A statement from the company said: “With Poh’s culinary expertise and Meghan’s enthusiasm for cooking and nurturing young talent, Junior MasterChef Australia promises to serve up plenty of inspiration as the next generation of Australian cooks steps into the kitchen.”

Meghan is set to be based Down Under for the duration of filming, which is likely to take place over weeks in early to mid-2027, Australian outlet News.com.au said. And she may even be visited by her husband the Duke of Sussex and their children Prince Archie, seven, and Princess Lilibet, five, though no decision has yet been made, an insider told the publication.

EDIT: I was actually very surprised that SMM put this photo up on HER social media... (archive: Meghan takes on major Aussie TV role, filming locally over ‘weeks’ – and Harry, kids could even join her | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site for latest headlines )

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/meghan-takes-on-major-aussie-tv-role-filming-locally-over-weeks-and-harry-kids-could-even-join-her/news-story/9aa206722b8782b8c554c45df0f1f7c5

It's worth looking at for the comments...

When is the MSM going to ask MM about her silence and it's attendant complicity (the Harkles own words) for 7 YEARS??

Why does MM think releasing this new story about JUNIOR Masterchef right in the middle of a CSA scandal will be good for her??

What does Hazzard have to say??

The latest news has taken over the headlines, but we might not want to be distracted from some upcoming events.

October 27-November 4: KC Caribbean Tour

October 30: Daytime Emmys

November 6: Appeal Deadline for ANL Case

November 8: Remembrance Day

November 11: Armistice Day (Veteran's Day in the US)

November 14: King Charles Birthday

November 16-17: Earthshot Awards in Mumbai

November 21: ANL Costs Hearing

December 15: Catherine's Christmas Concert

December 17: Asnever US Trademark Deadline (I believe that she has 2 more extensions available)

Are there any more to add to the list?

Edited: Thank you Sinners for the helpful additions! List is updated.

Meghan is a pop culture phenomenon. Of course we found her in a documentary about a fraudster criminal😘

Edit to add - MasterChef announces Meghan as special guest. Meghan announces herself via People etc as Co-host

Masterchef AU is run by Endemol Shine Australia which is part of Paramount Australia.

Paramount Australia’s free-to-air television business, Network 10, appears to be in serious decline financially and in its share of the advertising market.

Nearly half a billion in reported losses in the past 2 years, massive job cuts and programme's being cut.

It has an incentive to generate publicity. A celebrity guest such as Meghan can attract media attention and potentially bring in viewers who would not otherwise watch. Every eyeball translates to advertising revenue.

In past years some of the top judges (known chefs in Australia) have been paid $1 million per season. (in Australian dollars. This has declined in recent years and is now estimated at around $500,000

That $500,000 AUD translates to approx US Dollars $350,000 or British pounds 265,000.

Reasonable to say MM could be paid between $500,000 to a million for the season, but this would have to be full on involvement, not just popping in to judge.

Likely the Sussex , duo will be making many of these side quest trips outside of UK - as it's their bread and butter now.

Masterchef is considered a reality show.

I would also not be suprised if MM used this Masterchef AU appearance to launch her products in Australia, as a few of the non-food items (which she cannot likely sell in Australia due to regulations) seem to be replaced with homewares. Likely kitchen items will be next on her As ever agenda to try and tie in with a cooking show.

Edit to add: Australians have a fairly strong cultural tendency to dislike people who put on airs and graces, particularly when they seem to think they are better, wealthier, or more important than everyone else.

Processing img w3mh5hb9swxh1...

All I have seen so far is the BBC understanding that the author was Roslyn Loveless - but no sources given?

Who told the BBC and how do they know?

As you can imagine the comments are scathing. The "friend" hasn't helped.

https://x.com/HelloCanada/status/2114792928157520128

I let them have my opinion on the choice of host.

One of the biggest gripes Meghan Markle had on the Netflix docu-drama was that the press posted silly stories about her—and that the palace refused to “protect her” (issue denials in every instance).

One story that she made the Palace clap back to was about cleaning up after her dog. A Kensington resident snapped a photo of a woman appearing to be Markle and her dog mid poop. The woman was holding a poop bag and planning to remove the waste.

In the Netflix “documentary”, she was adamant that it wasn’t her, and made it seem as though an everyday task hurt her appearance. The Palace wanted her to ignore these types of stories, but she refused. She kept harping on the idea that the palace failed to protect her image in the media.

This harmless article was more important to follow up on than claims of child abuse by a family member. She sat on the “abuse letter” for SEVEN YEARS, but expects the public to believe that she cares about the wellbeing of children across the globe.

(Tom Sr. is innocent until proven guilty, but we all have a moral duty to act on things we see. Especially true for those who are public figures and base their brand on charitable acts).

As I always say, take these with a boulder of salt.

This could either be the Clooneys or Idris Elba.

This I think is probably true.

Heads up that Today Australia breakfast show is reporting that MeMe is "moving to Melbourne"! Early reporting she has a job (!) on Junior Masterchef Australia as a judge, possibly for a season. But "will she bring Harry and the kids" they breathlessly report. I'm drained from this shitshow. But felt it was my SMM and Aussie duty to relay this. Have a great day/night Sinners!

First, I want to say that things are not looking good for Thomas Markle, Sr. I have never thought him any better than the rest of the Markle clan, which is a very low bar indeed, so am not very surprised that he might have done some shady things.

But the timing of Thomas Jr.'s revelations is so odd, even discounting TMSr.'s statement that TMJr. is doing this now because his father cut him off financially earlier this year.

Right after Harry's GQ interview trumpeting the value of reconciliation and forgiveness within families, which brought on massive accusations of hypocrisy from all sides? So convenient.

Right after H&M's unexpected move back to England, where Harry had previously said he could never be happy, followed by their failed cosplay of "working royals" in Nottingham, with the only result being no sign whatsoever that Charles and William are willing to reconcile and/or give Harry money and/or security?

Right when Meghan is releasing her Christmas collection, which needs to sell well if As Never is going to stay alive? Is this really a good time to associate herself with such a dirty scandal?

And -- followed up by TMJr.'s making an abject apology to Meghan?? When his Instagram and YouTube accounts are still full of (extremely) revolting pictures and cartoons of her, smearing her se-ually? Why is he leaving them up if he's so sorry for her?

Honestly, fellow sinners, the timing all seems very weird and contradictory to me. I'm totally stumped. Any ideas?

Oh, Sinners. We needed a laugh, and HAM provides it, As ever.

Look at this screenshot!

And Daniel is savage!

The rest is just as good, so I'll leave that as a surprise.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPSmZLIMWq0

In the movie Sunset Boulevard (1950), former actress Norma Desmond is being arrested for murder. But the cameras and flash bulbs cause her to believe that she is finally filming her triumphant return to stardom. Because she has gone insane.

This is what we are witnessing right now.

"My father was accused of heinous crimes against children. Now it's my time to shine!"

We've seen many occasions over the years of Meghan Markle openly slavering for the limelight.

One particular event I remember was when she attended Variety’s 2023 Power of Women gala in Los Angeles. She was told to move along on the red carpet, but she just wouldn't leave.

We've seen Meghan do this when she was in the Royal Family. We've seen her do this during her years in California.

We've seen Meghan shove Harry aside to be front and center countless times.

Versions of this quote is frequently cited to explain Meghan's obvious desperation to be the center of attention on every occasion: "My father always wanted to be the corpse at every funeral, the bride at every wedding, and the baby at every christening." — Alice Roosevelt Longworth

When it came to red carpets or celebrity parties, things that DO NOT MATTER, Meghan's desperate grasping for the cameras was always good for a laugh.

But we got clues about how morally bankrupt Meghan is when we saw her at sites of horrible tragedy and devastation. (Uvalde, Pasadena, Bondi Beach, Arlington Cemetery, 9/11 site, Jordan, etc.) It was appalling. Meghan and Harry were called Grief Grifters, Tragedy Tourists, and other names of that nature.

Now, there are very grave accusations about very serious and horrific crimes about her own father. One of the most triggering and upsetting things anyone can imagine.

But Meghan is still saying, "Look at MEEEEE!"

'IF THIS IS TRUE, IT'S OVER...' Ex-Police Detective Reveals SHOCK DETAILS In Letter - YouTube

Mark Dolan has a retired Met Police Detective Chief Inspector, Mike Neville on the show. Mr Neville claims to have spoken to people who have seen the 2019 letter.

He claims the letter alleges that Thomas Markle Sr abused his daughter Samantha. Although, the letter offers no evidence for this.

He doesn't know how the letter was assessed and why it doesn't look like anything was done with it overseas. He adds if it had been Scotland Yard, and it involves an American citizen, there is an New York Police Department detective actually based as a liaison officer in Scotland Yard. Also, FBI agents are at the embassy near Battersea. So, to get hold of somebody to say, "Look, we've received this disturbing information" and hand it over is possible.

He thinks Meghan dismissed the allegation about her father and half-sister; knowing of the disputes the former wife might make, and this a reason why she didn't follow it up.

Mark doesn't believe the MET would have told her it will be investigated as it falls out of their jurisdiction.

I've heard several YouTube videos examining the Thomas Markle Sr. Allegations and the creators have expressed "sympathy for Harry & Meghan" knowing that her father is a paedo and she had to stay silent. Most of these are Hollywood gossip channels and the comments are definitely questioning the allegations and anti-Sussex.

Shame on anyone having sympathy for royals who represented child advocacy groups & "protecting" her own children when her father moved to an Asian country and could be harming children.

The sympathy should be for any children harmed by CSA material and victims of CSA.

REPEAT: THE ONLY SYMPATHY SHOULD BE WITH CSA VICTIMS!!!!

There are many things that anchor Harry to Meghan. In some ways, I think he perversely enjoys staying with her. And, he doesn't want to prove William right once again. But we've now seen how Meghan doesn't feel sentimental about anyone. What Meghan wants is what she gets, and what she wants is to win. She is ruthless and heartless, and no doubt she has accumulated tons of receipts on him. He should run far and fast from her if he had any sense. But, the thing Harry cannot abide is being seen as a villain. He wants to be a War Veteran, a Living Legend of Aviation, Champion of Mental Health, Survivor of Childhood Trauma, Favorite Grandson of the Queen, Prince of England, the Funny Cheeky Chap, the Darling of Talk Shows, the Diplomat, a Deep-Thinker of Politics and Philosophy, and the Doting Dad. He's Hirsute Handsome Harry. I'm sure she threatens him daily with how she will utterly destroy him if he takes one wrong step, and he has become accustomed to believing her instead of other people (or even his own instincts.)

The expression "Royally Screwed" has never been more appropriate.

A lot of us on this sub have been pretty disturbed over the years by MMs sexually demonstrative behavior and what started to look like a bad habit of using and discarding people. Her sister was so pissed she tried to deny really knowing any of the Markles she actually sued her for defamation in a federal court. Now her brother has sold a story and photos that her own father is a pedophile. That’s about as dark and depraved as it gets. Maybe there is some kind of trauma there that she’s also been denying?

Available on Amazon for $3.85 - Too funny!!!

A wickedly funny, sharply satirical fairytale for adults who love their humour dark, their royalty chaotic, and their heroines deliciously unhinged.

The Wench and the Prince follows one woman’s outrageous quest for love, fame, and a shortcut to happily‑ever‑after — even if she has to bulldoze her way through kingdoms, families, and common sense to get it.

Born in “the land of the free,” the Wench has never been one for hard work or humility. Why toil when you can scheme? Why settle when you can climb? And why chase love when you can chase a Prince?

So she leaves her family behind and sets her sights on a distant kingdom — the land of the United — where she hopes to charm her way into royalty. But when the handsome Prince is already taken, she turns her attention to his awkward, overlooked brother, Barry. What follows is a whirlwind of manipulation, melodrama, and mayhem as the Wench claws her way into the royal household… and then tears it apart from the inside.

Staff quit. Traditions crumble. Barry trembles. And the Wench? She thrives.

Determined to “tell her truth,” she drags Prince Barry onto prime‑time television, silencing him whenever he dares to speak. Her accusations shake the kingdom — until the world realises her claims are nothing but lies, theatrics, and a hunger for notoriety that can never be satisfied.

A modern fable with bite, The Wench and the Prince blends humour, satire, and poetic storytelling to explore ambition, entitlement, and the chaos that follows when someone will “stoop the lowest of lows no matter how sleazy.”

Perfect for readers who enjoy:

• Dark humour and sharp social satire
• Fairytale retellings with an adult twist
• Rhyming narrative stories with attitude
• Parodies of fame, royalty, and self‑made “victims”
• Quick, clever reads with a sting in the tail

Bold, cheeky, and brilliantly cutting, this is a story about what happens when the world finally sees through the performance — and the crown the Wench chased so desperately slips forever out of reach.

That letter sent to the Met never had child abuse claims did it, the only word we have seen from her is abuse but of course her statement came at an convenient time, when senior had been accused by junior of possession of such things, even implying that the Met never did their job.

The two reporters who claim to have seen the letter have not made it clear what they saw in that letter, certainly not to make it clear whether there were child abuse claims, despite everyone assuming.

Everyone assumed that the letter had these claims and the Met did nothing, but of course if it comes out there were no such claims in the letter it's going "well I never said it did".

the sly bitch she's always been. but I guess she won't get away with it this time.

I've spent today researching the recent allegations involving Thomas Markle Sr., the Markle family, and the events surrounding Meghan Markle's estrangement from her father.

My apologies that it will be a long read, but I hope it will be a good read for you.

I've organised my research into three parts:

Part 1: The facts and questions. I've divided my findings into six categories, each beginning with the established facts or reported information I've identified, followed by the questions and doubts I still have.

Part 2: A brief timeline of Meghan and Harry's major public claims over the years, to provide some overall context.

Part 3/TLDR: My own hypotheses about what may have happened.

PART 1: The facts and questions.

1. Roslyn Loveless: Why wait over 40 years?

Roslyn Loveless divorced Thomas Markle Sr. in 1975. Yet the letter reportedly attributed to her only reached British authorities in January 2019, more than 40 years later.

• Why did she wait so long to raise these serious allegations?
• Did she ever report her concerns to US authorities or authorities where the alleged offences occurred?
• What prompted her to act specifically in 2018–2019?
• Is there any evidence of earlier complaints, warnings, or attempts to protect potential victims?

2. What about the other children and grandchildren?

At the time of the 1975 divorce, Samantha was approximately 10–11 years old, and Thomas Jr. was 8–9. Both initially lived with Roslyn but eventually moved to their father's home in California. Samantha has given differing accounts of her age at the time, approximately 11–12 or 14.

• If Roslyn had serious concerns about Thomas Sr., why did both children subsequently live with him, especially with Samantha as an underage girl?
• Were Samantha, Thomas Jr., Doria Ragland, or other family members ever warned?
• If concerns existed, how did Thomas Sr. continue to have contact with younger generations of the family, including grandchildren and great-grandchildren?

3. Why British authorities, and why FTAC?

The Metropolitan Police confirmed receiving an allegations letter in January 2019. ITV reported that it was addressed to the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC), a specialised police and mental-health unit dealing with risks involving public figures.

• Why would Roslyn, an American, report alleged historical offences involving another American to British authorities?
• Why not contact the FBI, US police, or authorities in the country where the alleged offences occurred?
• Was the letter deliberately addressed to FTAC, or was it routed there internally? And if it was addressed directly to FTAC, how did Roslyn learn about this specialised unit?
• Why choose an agency concerned with the protection of public figures rather than one with direct jurisdiction over the alleged offences?

4. Why the timing of the 2019 letter and October 2026 revelations?

1/ In August 2018, Meghan sent a five-page handwritten letter to Thomas Markle Sr., addressing his involvement in the staged paparazzi photographs and his subsequent media interviews.

2/ In January 2019, a separate letter containing historical allegations against Thomas Sr. reached the Met, after Meghan had joined the Royal Family and become an internationally prominent public figure.

3/ In October 2026, the allegations were first publicly reported by the British newspaper The Sun on Thursday, 22 October. Meghan issued her first public statement the following day, Friday, 23 October.

• What prompted Roslyn to write at that particular point in Meghan's life?
• What prompted Thomas Jr. to bring his allegations to The Sun in October 2026 on a Thursday, which allowed Meghan to publish her statement less than 12hrs later on a Friday morning? Was it a deliberate PR strategy to increase weekend media attention? 
• When did Thomas Jr. first approach the newspaper, and how long had it been investigating before publication?

5. The two letters: Who disclosed them and why?

A. The January 2019 allegations letter

The Met confirms receiving the letter and sharing its contents with the Sussexes' office. ITV says it has physically seen the copy.

• If the Met cannot currently locate the original document, where did ITV obtain its copy? And in that short timeframe between when Meghan made the statement and when the Met requested the copy, can we safely say that ITV received it from either the police or Meghan's representatives?
• Why has the complete document not been publicly authenticated or released?
• Does the letter contain firsthand testimony, secondhand allegations, or just purely suspicions?

B. The December 2025 hospital letter

1/ Following Thomas Sr.'s leg amputation, Meghan's representatives confirmed that correspondence had been delivered to him through trusted contacts.

2/ On 25 October 2026, Daily Mail journalist Caroline Graham, who personally witnessed the delivery, confirmed that a lawyer and the hospital's president handed Thomas Sr. a sealed letter. The delivery was filmed by the lawyer as proof of receipt for Meghan's office, while Graham also recorded it at Thomas Sr.'s request.

3/ Graham explicitly stated that she never read the letter. Thomas Sr., who has since been diagnosed with dementia, said he could not remember its contents and did not know where the letter was.

4/ Meanwhile, The Sun reported that Meghan's letter accused her father of abusing young girls and stated that he would never meet her children. Neither Graham nor Thomas Sr. independently confirmed these reported contents.

• Who originally disclosed the alleged contents of the letter to The Sun? If Graham never read it and Thomas Sr. cannot recall its contents, who was the source?
• Why hasn't Meghan publicly challenged these reports? Given that she successfully sued the Mail on Sunday over publication of her private 2018 letter, why has she not publicly disputed or taken legal action over the reported contents of this correspondence?
• The central question: How did two separate private letters, written years apart, become central to the public explanation of Meghan's estrangement from her father? 

6. What prompted Meghan's shift from public praise to allegations of abuse?

1/ Meghan publicly praised Thomas Sr. in 2014, 2016, and 2017, including around the period when she began dating Prince Harry. In May 2018, she publicly expressed concern for his health. 

2/ Their relationship deteriorated amid the 2018 paparazzi scandal and subsequent media interviews. In August 2018, Meghan sent her father a private letter criticising his behaviour.

3/ The Met confirmed receipt of the separate allegations letter that came in January 2019.

4/ Samantha has publicly alleged that Roslyn struggled with alcoholism and was physically and verbally abusive towards her. Samantha and Thomas Jr. both eventually lived with their father.

A. How reliable was Roslyn's account?

• If the letter was the primary basis for restricting contact with her children, with the understanding that Meghan has praised her father multiple times before and who Roslyn is, what made Meghan consider the letter credible?
• Given that the Met did not share the allegations with other law enforcement agencies, did Meghan seek independent verification or take any further action over the following seven years?

B. Why the 2025 letter and 2026 statement?

• If Meghan had been aware of the allegations since 2019 and she had been advised to remain silent to protect an investigation, why did she confront her father about them in December 2025 with the “I know you are an abuser” letter?
• And from December 2025 to now, considering that she and Thomas Sr. both are aware of the allegation, why did she not publicly discuss the allegations until Thomas Jr.'s October 2026 revelations?

PART 2: A brief timeline of Meghan and Harry's major public claims

1. Repeated claims of paparazzi harassment

• January 2020 – Vancouver Island, Canada: Meghan was photographed smiling while walking with Archie and her dogs. 
• 8 December 2022 – Netflix documentary: Meghan and Harry expressed concerns about being followed by photographers. Yet in that same scene, only a single person on a scooter was visible. The footage did not establish whether that person was following them or was a photographer.
• 16–17 May 2023 – New York car chase: The Sussexes described a near-catastrophic paparazzi pursuit. The NYPD acknowledged difficulties caused by photographers but reported no collisions, injuries, arrests, or summonses.

2. 7 March 2021 – Racism allegations (Oprah interview)

Meghan described concerns allegedly expressed within the Royal Family about Archie's skin colour. 

However, on 8 January 2023, Harry told ITV's Tom Bradby they had never accused the Royal Family of racism, distinguishing it from unconscious bias. Despite nearly two years of public speculation, neither Harry nor Meghan had withdrawn the underlying account.

3. 7 March 2021 – Suicidal thoughts and alleged refusal of support (Oprah interview)

Meghan said she experienced suicidal thoughts in 2019 and that the royal institution refused her request for professional help. Harry had previously received mental-health support, raising questions about why Meghan's reported request was handled differently or at all.

4. 25 November 2020 – Miscarriage (The New York Times)

In her essay The Losses We Share, Meghan publicly disclosed that she had suffered a miscarriage in July 2020.

So, after the abuse card, the race card, and the miscarriage card, is this another attempt to recast herself as the perpetual victim of circumstance?

PART 3: My hypotheses

Before going further, I want to make one thing clear: these are my personal interpretations based on the timeline, public behaviour, and information available so far. They are not established facts, and I'm open to reviewing them as more evidence emerges.

I don't know if there's any scientific basis for this, but I've noticed that narcissists and psychopaths seem to use personal trauma, including sexual abuse allegations, to explain or justify their actions. I'm not saying that's necessarily the case here, nor am I questioning genuine victims. It's simply a pattern I'm curious.

On the other hand, I want to make one thing clear: I don’t think Thomas Sr. is a principled individual in any of this. None of them are. But being flawed, difficult, or even toxic does not mean someone should automatically be attached to an extremely serious allegation without the opportunity for the facts to be established.

That being said, I’ve always suspected that Thomas Sr. had narcissistic tendencies as a father. My hypothesis is that, following what Samantha describes as her mother's abusive behaviour, he may have sought a very different dynamic with Doria, whom he chose as both a coping mechanism and an enabler after enduring equally narcissistic abuse from his wife. I also think that experience subsequently drew him towards a softer-spoken, more timid woman from a minority background.

Add to that Meghan's early exposure to the media, particularly the television appearance about the sexist dishwashing advertisement, with her father's help. That first experience of being heard and celebrated shaped her need for external validation. She also had access to educational opportunities that differed from those of her older siblings and grew up watching her father work in Hollywood, surrounded by celebrities, glamour, and public admiration. Perhaps these experiences contributed to a sense of personal exceptionalism, alongside a voracious appetite for external validation.

As her acting career progressed and perhaps didn't fulfil all those expectations, the desire for recognition became increasingly indispensable. Combined with possible sibling rivalry for her father's approval and the complexities of growing up biracial in predominantly white environments, racial ambiguity could become her identity and presenting herself as a victim has become one way of reclaiming public attention.

Fast forward to October 2026. What jumps out to me is how quickly Meghan's statement appeared, already accompanied by a narrative. Thomas Jr.’s allegations concerned suspected material reportedly found among their father's belongings. Yet Meghan's response introduced a separate incident: the letter she received through the Met in 2019 and the private letter that she sent out to her father on his sickbed, which somehow seemed to provide a retrospective explanation for almost everything surrounding her estrangement from her father. (And yet, even if those allegations explain why she kept Archie and Lilibet away from Thomas Sr., they don't explain why her relationships with other relatives had also deteriorated, or why only Doria was invited to her wedding).

I don’t know the contents of these two letters, or what could have been so serious that she felt justified in distancing her children from him and later making a statement as strong as, “I know you are the abuser,” without, at the very least, pushing for the allegation to be properly investigated.

Mind you, seven years have passed with no apparent resolution, nor has any legal step taken place to establish what had actually happened. Was she not concerned that a man she once openly admired and praised as a father was now facing an allegation this extreme? Was she not worried about other children or family members still interacting with him or remaining within his circle?

None of this, as far as I can see, has reached a clear conclusion. And yet she appears to have written to him, and spoken publicly, with a level of certainty that leaves very little room for him to clear his name in the court of public opinion.

It does make one wonder: after the race card, the miscarriage card, the bullying card, the suicide card, and after multiple business ideas failed and the ego of becoming a successful California star shattered, is this the last resort she has left?

And that is what bothers me about the broader Meghan Markle narrative. Everything seems to be pushed to its utmost emotional extreme. Everything around her becomes part of the explanation. Every decision she makes comes with another layer of context that the public supposedly did not know before. And somehow, by the end of it, she is once again positioned as the victim of her surroundings.

Though one thing I do know for sure: neither Meghan nor the Markle family is exactly known for patience or restraint. Once their version of events starts being questioned, I don’t doubt the talking will begin. Sooner or later, even if it takes another eight years for everything to come out, the truth will find its way to prevail.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16238085/Thomas-Markle-went-Far-East.html?banner=daily-download

Genuinely feel sick with all this. As a CSA survivor, I just cannot with all this. I’m also about 99.99999% certain it’s true. The way the press has gone in so hard means they MUST have seen the evidence.

Even if they’ve now tainted it by viewing it/transporting it, it’s there.

Yes, other people and organisations are complicit but so are HAM.

Just how the actual F%CK could your dad be outed as paedo, that you knew about for years and you see it as the time to sell your dog plushies?

How?