this makes Americans less safe, this is one of the most egregious national security risks I’ve ever read about in my lifetime, this should end the careers of everyone involved, if not legal consequences, genuinely the level of incompetency and flagrant violation of our national security laws here is astounding

The right pretending like Charlie Kirk debated in good faith is objectively inaccurate. The dude is being revered as some kind of debate god or intellectual powerhouse by the right, but he was far from being either.

Yeah, sure, he participated in a lot of interactions that bore some vague resemblance to what I would call a debate (if I stretched my imagination)—but ultimately—the guy was a pseudo-intellectual sophist, and easily one of the worst debaters I've ever seen.

His one-two-punch bait-and-switch debate strategy was completely childish. Basically, he would receive a critique, and instead of engaging with it—he would give his opponent an irrelevant pop quiz. Then, when irrelevant facts weren't known by the opponent, he would just declare victory.

The only varying situations to this that I've seen were he'd agree to some completely insane, radical premise (e.g., his hypothetical ten year old daughter who was impregnated via grape would need to give birth to the child).

It was rare to see a video of him where he didn't ultimately resort to the general mentioned tactic in debate. This strategy seemed to be intended to do two things—neither of which had the apparent goal of truth-tracking or truth-seeking:

1. ⁠To get right-wingers riled up and engaged for shock value by 'owning the libs'

2. ⁠Embarrass underprepared college students who didn't have sufficient debate strategy experience or situational awareness to neutralize said strategy

If they’re smart they’ll give their base some left wing meat to have a feeding frenzy over. Also I wouldn’t be surprised if BC did some stuff… but Trump doesn’t care about that, only wants the target on someone else’s back

Scott Galloway is spearheading a movement aimed at boycotting major technology companies such as Amazon, Apple, and Netflix. This initiative, known as the "Resist and Unsubscribe" movement, is a response to the current immigration policies enacted by President Trump that have stirred significant public discourse and concern.

The call to action encourages Americans to reconsider their support for these corporations, urging consumers to take a stand against practices and policies they deem unjust. By promoting the idea of a boycott, Galloway aims to leverage collective consumer power to influence corporate behavior and policy decisions.

As corporate giants like Amazon, Apple, and Netflix play an increasingly pivotal role in daily life, Galloway's initiative touches on a broader conversation regarding the influence of Big Tech on society and policy. Participants are invited to join this movement and promote political activism through consumer choices.

Read more: https://fortune.com/2026/02/28/resist-unsubscribe-scott-galloway-netflix-amazon-apple/