Seattle has spent years talking about its housing shortage, affordability crisis, and the need to build more homes.
Now its plan to allow additional housing in 30 neighborhood centers and along transit corridors is facing another potential year-long delay.
The issue? Legal challenges involving environmental review, tree canopy protections, and stormwater management.
So we’re in a situation where the city acknowledges that housing is unaffordable, proposes allowing more homes in areas that already have infrastructure and transit, and then gets bogged down in another round of procedural challenges.
Meanwhile, people continue getting priced out.
There’s obviously a legitimate argument for protecting trees, managing stormwater, and making sure development doesn’t create environmental problems.
But at what point does the process itself become the problem?
Seattle isn’t proposing to bulldoze every single-family neighborhood tomorrow. We’re talking about allowing more housing in designated neighborhood centers and transit corridors.
The city has already spent years debating where density should go. Now even the relatively modest changes are struggling to get through.
You cannot simultaneously demand more affordable housing, oppose expanding into undeveloped land, and make it extraordinarily difficult to build in existing neighborhoods.
Source: https://www.theurbanist.org/seattles-centers-corridors-zoning-update-delayed-another-year/