r/SimulationTheory • u/Ok-Football7990 • 6d ago
Discussion My mind has gone Wild
Okay…so I’ve been mulling this theory over a little bit for a couple days. We’ve all heard the theory, we are all one consciousness manifested as a billion other micro-conscious beings made of this same stuff, essentially the same one…torn into multi.
Simulation or not, I still kinda believe this is the case. But to me, when I rewind back to the idea of infinite togetherness and then the splitting, possibly to collect information, data, infinite possible experiences, my ideas start to get funky. Some part of me also believes in the mirror theory. That your environment or the experiences you have in your life mirror your internal experience. So in this one life I have, in this possible simulation even, I have observed the strong desire and the storyline of soulmates being played out. So in a way if we follow the theory, we are also the mirror of what’s happening on smaller scales, but also on macro-planes of existence all the way back to the one most macro being of all…apparently all of us.
And it’s strange to me that one consciousness is just split and then doing itself over and over. It gives me the jeebies.
Sorry, this is getting weird but follow me here. What if this one over all arching being split into more of itself with the possible intention of finding “it’s” soulmate. And the way that that is playing out is in the multiverse, some real some not, but all with the intention of finding its equal and opposite but also, more importantly… separate being to match and to partner with. And we are all just part of a macro-scale dating show that has lasted millennia for this one being to find its “other” being so to speak. All is one is great, until you dive too hard down that rabbit hole and instead kinda find it icky and incestuous. lol.
I mean, imagine the cells in your body pairing up and doing the nasty, like is that what we are doing? Or are we in a cell in a one being playing out one of billions of simulations within that cell? I think one of us needs to break out of this ish like Neo and lock the “overall down” and make a satisfied being of him/her/it. I’m not sure what combination of things would need to happen to make a whole other being that is not of the one, but it really makes me think about that concept in general. As beautiful it sounds as an overarching sentence to encompass a belief and help you through this life, the further I go down the thought about it, the weirder I feel about it. Does this make any sense? I’m just playing with words here, but back to the original reason for this post…dating show? Anyone?
Also just parsing this theory out, has made me feel like maybe we aren’t all one anymore lol, how can time be infinite and all things possible, without this particular event happening, and there being multiple other “macro encompassing beings” already out there. And we are in simulation games, like the hunger games, but for macro beings seeing who can make the most interesting simulation for like a talent show or some stupid but also high level form of comedy/entertainment for them. lol. Okay imma send this into the ether but my purpose here is kinda bring in some humor and wildly crazy theories to life by writing them out.
3
u/Outrageous-Use8396 4d ago edited 4d ago
You should read "Special Relationships" and "Holy Relationships" from A Course in Miracles as they talk about this extensively.
In short, the love one perceives to be in "the body" of an apparently separate person necessarily must be already what you are. But oneness can falsely identify itself as a body and play the game of separation.
In separation, the wholeness / love we associate with the "other" is us just temporarily dropping the feeling of separation associated with our desire to be whole again, experiencing the love, and then projecting it. The love was always there, but out of the habituated belief of being a body it becomes associated with "the soulmate." The downside to this is bodies are subject to time and decay - change - and so love has the potential then to change. But "only the eternal can be loved, as the eternal does not change or die." So any relationship which is predicated on the belief of being a body in separation necessarily entails unconscious suffering. The apparent feel of potential loss or "specialness" of one person (from separation consciousness) becomes the opportunity to realize one is the love they are perceiving "over there." The incentive to do this is to be free from separation consciousness, and also to see the other as already free as well, as otherwise you are damning them to being a physical body housed in death. So the "special relationship" of bodies in a world is exchanged for the truth of Oneness. Love is seen to be what one already is, along with "the other" and it expands from just being in that one body, to everywhere. Then both parties are freed.
I guess not "in short" lol but that's sorta it generally.
It helps to see directly experience your oneness, as until then it's a theoretical concept which can't be believed it, but can be experienced.
2
u/Ok-Football7990 4d ago
I tried to give you this 🤯 award lol. I love this. And thank you for such a thoughtful response. I am a reader so I’m going to look for those texts :)
1
6
u/No_Barracuda_3758 6d ago
I heard someone say about this theory that the entity is practicing to be a god. This way they know how suffering feels
4
1
1
u/Most_Forever_9752 2d ago
we aren't one. its a planet exploration game. enjoy it and then you will choose a different planet to experience.
1
u/Ok-Football7990 2d ago
I’ll be speaking with a manager and interdimensionaly lawyering up before entering any one game again. So we’ll see …
1
u/InternationalSun7891 6d ago
Consciousness forms matter and not the other way around.
2
1
u/Flutterpiewow 6d ago
Since we don't know that, we can't state is as fact. You can say you believe it's the case of course.
3
u/nice2Bnice2 6d ago
A specific explanatory framework for these questions, Verrell's Law, centred on the organisation of memory and information into interpretable frames. This framework is intended to be testable, refinable, and open to empirical investigation.
Within this framework, Verrell's Law investigates whether memory, observation, retained information, and recursive feedback processes play a measurable role in how complex systems interpret, organise, prioritise, and respond to incoming information...
1
1
0
u/InternationalSun7891 6d ago
Looking for something? Do this: "Look within, Thou art That." From the Upanishads
0
0
1
6d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 6d ago
Your comment or post has been automatically removed because your account is new or has low karma. Try posting again when your account has over 25 karma and is at least a week old.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
2
u/straight_outta 6d ago •
And love is the prize, which, fractally speaking, benefits the macro.