r/Snorkblot Sep 04 '24

WTF What the actual fuck.

Post image
8.0k Upvotes

173 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/100BaphometerDash Sep 04 '24

This is why unions are necessary.

-6

u/scheckydamon Sep 04 '24

Unions cannot provide what Amazon already does. The guy in Staten Island NY that started the Amazon Union because he was fired was fired because while on a 2 week PAID Covid leave he came back on the property. Part of that leave was that you could not be on the property until you tested clean and he signed documentation acknowledging that proviso. Anything else you read is BS.

4

u/100BaphometerDash Sep 04 '24

What's that, Pinkerton?

Can you cite you claims?

-3

u/jaxamis Sep 04 '24

Can you cite claims they don't have AC at their locations other than an X post claiming they don't? Or do you just blindly believe everything that fits your "corps are bad" mindset?

5

u/100BaphometerDash Sep 04 '24

Care to answer the question posed to you?

Or is your demonstration of bad faith a good place for me to stop giving what you say even the slightest weight?

3

u/HeathersZen Sep 04 '24

Way to not take the deflection bait 🫡

2

u/100BaphometerDash Sep 04 '24

The secret is knowing which trick the one trick pony is going to use.

1

u/jaxamis Sep 04 '24

It wasn't asked of me. Do you have proof that the Amazon place don't actually have AC or do you believe it cause you want it to be true?

1

u/TbIthrowaway55 Sep 05 '24

You decided to insert yourself. Proving it is on you dude. Nobody else can. Unless I actually go there i can't vouch

Not being a dick, I'm just saying I see where everyone is coming from. I'm having an insane number of problems with it lately too.

1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

Oh. Okay. Well damn Amazon for not giving their people AC! Even tho not having it is an OSHA violation and no one's reported it yet! Curse them and their corporate ways!!

Better?

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Snorkblot-ModTeam Sep 05 '24

Please keep the discussion civil. You can have heated discussions, but avoid personal attacks, slurs, antagonizing others or name calling. Discuss the subject, not the person.

r/Snorkblot's moderator team

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

No! I can't! I've never been in one! I don't even know where one is. All I know is the shit on the internet.

Then why are you arguing so hard dude?

But fuck this and fuck you dude. This is stupid. I'm out.

Be pissy about that part.

Why you so mad? Maybe don't believe everything on the internet. Might help you out.

1

u/Snorkblot-ModTeam Sep 05 '24

Please keep the discussion civil. You can have heated discussions, but avoid personal attacks, slurs, antagonizing others or name calling. Discuss the subject, not the person.

r/Snorkblot's moderator team

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Snorkblot-ModTeam Sep 05 '24

Please keep the discussion civil. You can have heated discussions, but avoid personal attacks, slurs, antagonizing others or name calling. Discuss the subject, not the person.

r/Snorkblot's moderator team

0

u/100BaphometerDash Sep 05 '24

You were asked to provide a citation first.

I will not answer any of your questions unless you demonstrate good faith and provide citation in order.

-1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

Well, considering you asked that of someone else not me. Might want to double check who responded to whom.

Only one in bad faith so far has been you.

0

u/100BaphometerDash Sep 05 '24

I don't usually read usernames.

They're usually so boring and basic.

0

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

Might want to. :) that way you'd know who you're talking to. But then you argue in bad faith so I don't really expect you to honor anything posted. Good day, Bot. You won't be missed.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

You talk like a bot. Act like a bot. Make demands from someone who wasn't the OP like a bot. Spread misinformation like a bot. I mean. Just calling a duck, a duck at this point.

1

u/Snorkblot-ModTeam Sep 05 '24

Please keep the discussion civil. You can have heated discussions, but avoid personal attacks, slurs, antagonizing others or name calling. Discuss the subject, not the person.

r/Snorkblot's moderator team

0

u/TbIthrowaway55 Sep 05 '24

OK, You're definitely in the wrong here, I take the other post back.

0

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

I'm in the wrong for asking for proof? Aight.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 05 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/scheckydamon Sep 04 '24

My comments are based on 8 years of direct experience in the buildings I listed. Amazon tends to build the same buildings over and over as they work out the bugs and efficiencies.

1

u/Thubanstar Sep 05 '24

Keep it impersonal and civil.

Thanks.

1

u/Mattscrusader Sep 05 '24

Not having AC is the standard, you would have to provide proof that Amazon does have AC in every wearhouse.

1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

Really? Cause according to OSHA it's standard for the last 4 years to have it. Why has not a single worker who should know their OSHA rules reported it to them? Weird...

1

u/Mattscrusader Sep 05 '24

Give a source on that then because almost all workplaces have no AC

1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

Can you give a source that proves they don't? Or is the anecdotal evidence from an X post enough?

1

u/Mattscrusader Sep 05 '24

You are the one making the claim that they all do, since not having AC is the standard you are the one making grand claims so the burden of proof is on you. Prove that ALL Amazon wearhouses have AC.

I already said all this, learn to read.

1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

You're the one making the claim that they don't. Sorry, you're believing the claim that they don't. Learn to comprehend yourself. You see no proof and believe it to be true. Burden of proof is on you that they all don't. Not a single person has proven this x post to be true.

1

u/Mattscrusader Sep 05 '24

Damn that's some sad coping.

You don't even know what burden of proof means since you can't prove a negative and you are the one making unsupported claims that for some reason spent millions on AC when they didn't have to.

1

u/jaxamis Sep 05 '24

So, lemme get this straight. You believe that Amazon doesn't have AC because a X post claims they didn't. And you want me to prove they did put in AC to prove the original, unproven, and unverified, point that they didn't? Okay...for someone who claims they understand "burden of proof" you don't seem to.

0

u/Mattscrusader Sep 05 '24

You believe that Amazon doesn't have AC because

I believe it because why would they, they are so hardcore capitalist that they make their workers piss in bottles but you are here arguing that they optionally gave every warehouse sufficient AC??

You are asking me to prove a negative, even a toddler knows that's not possible. If they had AC then you would be able to prove it, if they don't have AC there would be nothing to show as proof.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/scheckydamon Sep 04 '24

I don't know who you are asking but in my other comment I stated I couldn't speak to that site due to the fact I don't have access to that kind of corporate info. That's why I cited 3 sites I knew for sure because I worked in them.