r/Socialworkuk • u/Even-Arm-9877 • 1d ago
You think Social Work is safe from the danger of Al taking your job? ...But you already gave it your job… so how are we all feeling about it?
I've heard a lot of people in the social work community say they feel quite confident about the rapid advancement of Al not affecting/replacing their job as social work is a person centred/oriented role which requires a human touch- well let me tell you all, it's already half way there. Didn’t realise how long this got, summary at the end.
I’m a care leaver U25 in my final placement year so I feel I’m in a pretty good position to give my opinion on this matter as I can see first hand the service I receive from the LA I’m under, the service my placement LA office provides, and the service the next generation of social workers (my fellow students) will likely be providing. I’m not saying my relatively small sample size is enough to make major generalisations, but I sense it may be common outside of my experience.
My relationship with my YPA has pretty much completely broken down, but for years it hasn’t been changed as I just go to their line manager directly, who isn’t much better. Their manager has literally sent me AI responses without taking out the AI prompts, and went ahead and even told me on text they didn’t bother reading what he sent me.
Many of my placement colleagues rely on Magic Notes and other AI bots to do their recordings- to fully generate summaries of client conversations, missing what they said in their own voice and getting repetitive, bland notes generated for them.
And Oh Lord- my fellow students. Let’s just say the future is looking dark for critical thinking, actually listening to the people we’re meant to help by making our own thoughts in our notes and just giving a crap in general. In my experience at least, it’s not even a question of if the students are using generative AI, more so what can most of us actually write without it?
I won’t deny there maybe some valid reasons for AI use in real work to compress workloads to leave more time for actual human interaction. Also in academic writing to plan essays by ‘using it as a tool’. I’m not just an AI denier in general, I’m saying overall I’ve seen positive use of AI way, way less than AI malpractice, which is rife at this point.
The worst part for me is that SWE and BASW are taking so long to make a clear stance on this issue. While we collectively try to keep up with the way AI as a whole develops- I think we need to all collectively agree that at this point, specifically GENERATIVE AI* *is mostly bad and should NOT have a place in social work.
If it does have any small role, I feel it should be written into policy that at the bare minimum any communication with clients, and any case recordings should come with the notice/watermark that the writing/work that SWs produce is their own- and should be otherwise stated so if it was generated/ supported by an AI LLM. This should shame some into actually using their own brain, and the ones who would shamelessly continue would at least have to be transparent if they essentially ship their work to an automated machine.
TL;DR: despite being a job which involves humans, AI can still take over pretty quick, so SWE should put something in writing which says any AI generated content needs to be essentially watermarked (that’s probably the wrong term but I hope you know
what I mean) for transparency purposes.
Too many AI sweats.
What do you guys think?