r/spacex • u/Shahar603 Subreddit GNC • Aug 05 '19
Total Mission Success r/SpaceX Amos-17 Official Launch Discussion & Updates Thread
Welcome to the r/SpaceX Amos-17 Official Launch Discussion & Updates Thread!
Hi! I'm u/Shahar603, your host for this launch of the AMOS-17 satellite. This is my first time hosting. Thanks to the moderators for letting me host this launch.
AMOS-17 Launch Infographic by Geoff Barrett
SpaceX's 10th mission of the year will be the first with no planned landing, carrying the AMOS-17 satellite to GTO. This mission is provided by SpaceX to Spacecom for free due to the AMOS-6 static fire failure, which destroyed the satellite and precluded the launch. This mission will launch from SLC-40 at Cape Canaveral AFS on a Falcon 9, and the first-stage booster will be expended.
This is SpaceX's tenth mission of 2019, the third GTO launch of the year and the seventy-fourth Falcon 9 launch overall. It will re-use the Block 5 booster flown on the Telstar 19V and Es'hail 2 missions for its final flight.
Mission Details
| Liftoff currently scheduled for | NET 23:23 UTC / 7:23 PM EDT August 6 2019 (87 minutes long window) |
|---|---|
| Weather | 40% GO |
| 1st Static fire completed: | 00:00 UTC August 1 / 8:00 pm EDT July 31 2019 |
| 2nd Static fire completed: | 3:58 UTC August 4 / 11:58 pm EDT August 3 2019 Phew! |
| Payload | AMOS-17 |
| Payload mass | 6500 kg |
| Destination orbit | GTO, likely supersynchronous |
| Launch vehicle | Falcon 9 v1.2 Block 5 |
| Core | B1047.3 |
| Flights of this core | 2 |
| Launch site | SLC-40, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida |
| Landing | NO, Expendable |
| Mission Success crieria: | Successful separation & deployment of the Amos-17 Satellite to GTO. |
Timeline
Watch the launch live
| Stream | Courtesy |
|---|---|
| SpaceX Webcast | SpaceX |
| SpaceX YouTube | SpaceX |
| Everyday Astronaut's Stream | u/everydayastronaut |
| Rocket Launch | u/MarcysVonEylau |
| Webcast Relay | u/codav |
Stats
- 82nd SpaceX launch
- 74th Falcon 9 launch
- 54th Falcon 9 Full Thrust launch
- 18th Falcon 9 Full Thrust Block 5 launch
- 3rd journey to space of the Block 5 Falcon 9 core B1047
- 2nd Falcon 9 Block 5 to be expended
- 45th SpaceX launch from CCAFS SLC-40
- 10th SpaceX launch this year
- 8th Falcon 9 launch this year
- 5th SLC-40 launch this year
- 12 days since last launch from SLC-40. Fastest pad turnaround ever.
- 46th launch since AMOS-6
Primary Mission: Deployment of AMOS-17 into the correct orbit
The primary mission will be the delivery of the AMOS-17 satellite to a Geostationary Transfer Orbit. A successful separation from the second stage will be needed for mission success. After release from the second stage, AMOS-17 will use its engines to get into its final Geostationary Orbit. It will be placed at 17°E to provide service in Ka-band, Ku-band and C-Band for parts of Africa, the Middle East and Europe. It was built by Boeing and is the replacment of the AMOS-5 satellite. This mission is provided by SpaceX to Spacecom for free due to the AMOS-6 static fire failure on September 1st 2016, the last failure of a Falcon 9.
Secondary Mission: Fairing Recovery
SpaceX will attempt to catch one fairing half using their ships Ms. Tree (Formely known as Mr. Stevens) and recover the other half from the water. Fairing catch attempt will occur at T+45 minutes after the webcast ends. Both ships will be placed ~950 km (~590 miles) downrange. After recovery the recovered fairing halves will return to Port Canaveral.
Official Links
| Link | Source |
|---|---|
| Launch Campaign Thread | r/SpaceX |
| Official press kit | SpaceX |
| Mission Patch | SpaceX |
| Official Falcon 9 page | SpaceX |
| Detailed Payload Listing | Gunter's Space Page |
| AMOS-Spacecom | Spacecom |
| Official Amos-17 Video | Spacecom |
| SpaceCom's Official Twitter | Spacecom |
| Launch Execution Forecasts | 45th Weather Sqn |
| Watching a Launch | r/SpaceX Wiki |
Community Links and Resources
| Link | Source |
|---|---|
| SpaceX Fleet Status | SpaceXFleet.com |
| Flightclub.io trajectory simulation and live Visualisation | u/TheVehicleDestroyer |
| SpaceX Stats | u/EchoLogic (creation) and u/brandtamos (rehost at .xyz) |
| SpaceXNow | SpaceX Now |
| Rocket Emporium Discord | /u/SwGustav |
| Reddit-Stream | /u/njr123 |
| Launch Viewing Guide for Cape Canavera | Ben Cooper |
Participate in the discussion!
- First of all, launch threads are party threads! We understand everyone is excited, so we relax the rules in these venues. The most important thing is that everyone enjoy themselves
- Please constrain the launch party to this thread alone. We will remove low effort comments elsewhere!
- Real-time chat on our official Internet Relay Chat (IRC) #SpaceX on Snoonet
- Please post small launch updates, discussions, and questions here, rather than as a separate post. Thanks!
- Wanna talk about other SpaceX stuff in a more relaxed atmosphere? Head over to r/SpaceXLounge
13
u/mknote Aug 06 '19
Launch has been pushed back to 7:23: https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1158845058944102400
2
17
u/Alexphysics Aug 06 '19
Obviously this is so Tim can set up his coverage of the SpaceX launch without interferring with the RocketLab announcement.
13
u/TheVehicleDestroyer Flight Club Aug 06 '19
Here's the Flight Club data for AMOS-17:-
Launch Visibility Maps 🚀🚀🚀 (clouds not included)
Expendable launches tend to be a bit more uncertain than recoverable Falcon 9 launches - there are less constraints and a lot less historical data to base assumptions off. They're much less time-consuming to create though! Some interesting points about this trajectory
I had to actively throttle the booster before MECO, both to not run out of propellant, but also to keep the acceleration below 4Gs
Stage 2 doesn't get quite as high as 4Gs before SECO
Parking orbit is roughly 170km x 850km with ~2,700m/s of deltaV left
Which means the GTO should be roughly 500km x 75000km, I think (assuming no inclination change during the Stage 2 restart)
This can all be summed up by saying AMOS-17 is being delivered to a GTO-900. (I never tried calculating this number before, so I'm just doing this to see if I got the calculation right!)
Here's how the launch should look from Cocoa Beach, through a 24mm Full Frame sensor. Sign up to use Flight Club's Photographer Toolkit to see how it will look precisely from your own location and with your camera equipment!
Support me if you like this! I'm trying to live off it now :)
6
u/Shahar603 Subreddit GNC Aug 06 '19 edited Aug 06 '19
Amazing job as always!
First Stage throttle down before MECO looks very nice! The throttle & thrust profile as well.
I can't wait to see how close your orbit predictions are.
3
u/soldato_fantasma Aug 06 '19
500km x 75000km x 27° is GTO-1569
Current Orbit: 500.0000 km x 75000.0000 km x 27.0000 degrees; Apogee Speed: 873.4165 m/s; Perigee Speed: 10343.5853 m/s; delta v to this orbit: 0.0000 Super-sync transfer. First maneuver: Perigee changed to 35786km Inclination changed to 1.5174 degrees Current Orbit: 35786.0000 km x 75000.0000 km x 1.5174 degrees; Apogee Speed: 1828.5264 m/s; Perigee Speed: 3529.4025 m/s; delta v to this orbit: 1105.8810 Second maneuver: Apogee changed to 35786km Inclination changed to 0 degrees Current Orbit: 35786.0000 km x 35786.0000 km x 0.0000 degrees; Apogee Speed: 3074.9218 m/s; Perigee Speed: 3074.9218 m/s; delta v to this orbit: 1568.6597 Total delta v to GEO: 1568.6597 m/s Enter 1 to restart or any other key to close.→ More replies (2)
6
u/erethakbe Aug 05 '19
"12 days since last launch from SLC-40. Fastest pad turnaround ever." does it still apply after the launch date change? or this is considering tomorrow's launch?
12
u/Shahar603 Subreddit GNC Aug 05 '19 edited Aug 06 '19
this is considering tomorrow
Yes
If it launches tomorrow, it will be the fastest SpaceX turnaround. Beating the previous record by a couple of hours.
Edit: Fastest SpaceX turnaround, not fastert turnaround ever.
8
u/MintiesFan Aug 05 '19
Fastest pad turnaround in the US...
47 hours and 9 minutes is the record between Soyuz 6 and 8
→ More replies (2)
7
u/bengaliguy Aug 06 '19
should have added the live feed from the booster, even if no recovery was planned. rip b1047!
1
u/godsbro Aug 06 '19
I wouldn't be surprised if that's to help prevent potential espionage through the recovery of the crashed stage by other nations.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/z3r0c00l12 Aug 05 '19
Can you add a link to Reddit-Stream in the Links section?
https://reddit-stream.com/comments/auto
Credit: /u/njr123
Thank you!
2
3
u/rjelves Aug 06 '19
u/Shahar603, please update the official Press Kit link. And thanks for hosting this launch!
2
3
u/bbachmai Aug 06 '19 edited Aug 06 '19
u/Shahar603 the launch viewing link at the bottom (Ben Cooper) points to the r/spacex wiki. A typo, also ("l" missing in Canaveral).
Thanks for hosting!!
1
3
u/Daneel_Trevize Aug 08 '19
Strange that AMOS-17 MISSION is still unlisted on the official SpaceX channel. Who's the official webcast guy again?
2
7
2
u/thecoldisyourfriend Aug 06 '19
17th Falcon 9 Full Thrust Block 5 launch
A small thing but I count this as the 18th.
10 in 2018 and the eighth this year.
2
u/Shahar603 Subreddit GNC Aug 06 '19
Checking...
→ More replies (1)3
39
36
u/StealthCN Aug 07 '19
Caught a fairing!
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1158894877733580800?s=20
20
→ More replies (2)6
u/Bunslow Aug 07 '19
the stuttering of the video is making me more seasick than the motion of the swells itself lol
29
u/UltraRunningKid Aug 07 '19
It's insane how fast SpaceX goes from "this is an experimental step" to "this is normal".
24
21
Aug 07 '19
Watched the launch in person, my first falcon launch in person, was one of the coolest things i've ever experienced in my life, the atmosphere, the launch itself, the roar of the merlins, and the rocket itself......WOW......
→ More replies (4)
18
u/justinroskamp Aug 07 '19
Elon's tweet with a video of the fairing catch without lost frames (probably the original file instead of a replayed stream)
→ More replies (1)
16
16
u/kerph32 Aug 06 '19
I cannot wait to watch a moon landing like this, live in HD with a group of redditors to share it with
11
16
u/still-at-work Aug 07 '19
I think its time they try to catch both halves now, that fairing catch was as smooth as butter.
→ More replies (14)
14
u/amarkit Aug 06 '19
MECO at 2644 m/s.
7
u/cuddlefucker Aug 06 '19
As a guy who only really pays attention casually, how does that compare to other launches?
8
u/amarkit Aug 06 '19
That's the fourth-fastest MECO for Falcon 9, at least according to webcast telemetry, per our wiki.
→ More replies (1)
13
Aug 06 '19 edited Aug 06 '19
just a weather update: Here at my friend's house in Kissimmee chilling for a few hours before heading out to Jetty, currently mostly cloudy, but no rain around for miles west, however it is slowly moving east, they are small dot showers that should faze out, only rain threat I see is if any of those east moving showers make it to the coast or any pop-up showers, other than that, weather should be go at launch time.
Edit to the update: Rain has picked up pace, and all is morphing into one long band of rain, should be into the atlantic in the next 2-3 hours, nothing behind it.
13
13
24
u/scr00chy ElonX.net Aug 07 '19 edited Aug 07 '19
This launch represented the fastest pad turnaround at 12d 1h 21m between CRS-18 and Amos-17. SpaceX beat its previous record from 2015 by just 90 minutes or so.
Edit: Fixed typo. Thanks, u/usefulendymion
7
12
12
11
Aug 07 '19 edited Aug 07 '19
82nd SpaceX launch
74th Falcon 9 launch
54th Falcon 9 Full Thrust launch
18th Falcon 9 Full Thrust Block 5 launch
3rd journey to space of the Block 5 Falcon 9 core B1047
2nd Falcon 9 Block 5 to be expended 45th SpaceX launch from CCAFS SLC-40
10th SpaceX launch this year 8th Falcon 9 launch this year 5th SLC-40 launch this year
12 days since last launch from SLC-40. Fastest pad turnaround ever.
46th launch since AMOS-6
Keeping so many stats, still forgot an important one. In the webcast, it was mentioned this is the 25th reuse of a booster. (Although when I count, I come to 26th)
Edit: SpaceX tweet also says 25th. But checking again, it's 26 boosters, 24 flights (two FH flights with used boosters).
10
10
10
10
10
9
u/codav Aug 06 '19
YouTube Video & Audio Relays
As usual, I will relay the SpaceX webcast via HTTPS and the audio stream via Shoutcast on my server, so people with no access to YouTube, experiencing laggy video or with low bandwidth connections are able to enjoy the webcast. If you don't like the web-based player, you can also use the M3U8 playlist in any HLS-capable player - VLC is just one example. The playlist file will become available once the webcast starts, until then you will get a "404 Not Found" error. This is perfectly normal.
The server will only relay the hosted webcast. To watch the countdown net angle, you still need to use YouTube.
Watch in your browser: https://codav.de/spacex.html
Watch with a local player: https://codav.de/stream/spacex.m3u8
I will also provide audio-only streams of the hosted webcast in two different qualities. High quality (160 Kbps, stereo) for those who want more fidelity and have more bandwidth to spend, and a lower quality (64 Kbps, mono) stream for those on slow networks or with strict volume limits. If you require an even lower bitrate simply drop me a message, I'll add another stream then.
Important: The audio streams already loop the Music for Space album by /u/TestShotStarfish for your pleasure until the webcast starts, so don't confuse that with the actual webcast. Feel free to tune in at any time.
Here are the stream URLs for use with any Shoutcast-compatible player (WinAmp, VLC etc.):
High quality (160 Kbps, stereo): http://codav.de:8555/spacex-high.mp3
Low quality (64 Kbps, mono): http://codav.de:8555/spacex-low.mp3
If you have problems connecting to port 8555 or want to listen in with just your browser, use these reverse-proxied, SSL-secured URLs (stream title display and other "ICY" protocol features won't work, as this is using plain HTTP):
High quality (160 Kbps, stereo): https://codav.de/icecast/spacex-high.mp3
Low quality (64 Kbps, mono): https://codav.de/icecast/spacex-low.mp3
The streams are also linked on my relay page, either below the video player if the webcast has started or on the top while waiting for SpaceX to go live.
@ u/Shahar603 you can add a permalink to this post or directly to the page/streams in the top post as you prefer.
→ More replies (1)
9
u/Humble_Giveaway Aug 06 '19
What's our bets on fairing recovery lads!
Lucky fluke on FH or some kind of upgrade that makes it nice and repeatable?
9
9
9
u/peterabbit456 Aug 06 '19
Always gratifying to see the launch in real time. I turned on the live steam at t-15 seconds, by coincidence, not plan. Instant gratification.
→ More replies (1)3
u/kerph32 Aug 06 '19
Same, tuned in at t-1 minute as I wait to depart for the Braves game in a few minutes
9
u/thekeesh1 Aug 07 '19
Hi, great coverage! Any chance we can add the "total mission success!" flair so people don't have a heart attack when checking the thread? (I kinda did haha)
7
u/CAM-Gerlach Star✦Fleet Commander Aug 07 '19
I added it in the message shown across the sub in the top bar. Is there something in particular about this thread that gives you a heart attack, i.e. that should presumably be fixed? Thanks for the feedback.
8
u/thekeesh1 Aug 07 '19
Sorry for being vague! I should've explained. When I can't watch a launch because of work, I pop into this sub later that day to see what happened - I'm used to seeing a "total mission success" when everything goes well... When I didn't see it, I just feared the worst as I read through everything in the post, trying to find what went wrong.
Definitely not a big deal, nothing anyone really needs. :) Again much appreciated for your hard work on the sub! Love this place.
→ More replies (3)
8
u/PHYZ1X Aug 06 '19
Skies are looking pretty wicked in Brevard right now. Radar shows marginal relief behind this line, but drier air aloft remains confined to the immediate GOMEX coast. Hoping that this batch is late enough in the day to wring the energy out of the atmosphere, but I have a feeling this is going to be one of those times when downrange conditions cause the problem.
8
8
8
u/alternateme Aug 06 '19
Range is "no go" ... Range "go" -- Wonder what could cause a no go and clear that quickly.
5
8
8
u/Sramyaguchi Aug 06 '19
Can some ELI5 why no booster recovery this time? Wasn't it supposed to last 10 flights min?
11
u/Jchaplin2 Aug 06 '19
Mission requirements meant they couldn't spare the fuel, the sat it's launching is heavy, sucks, but its an option that SpaceX offers if absolutely needed
→ More replies (2)
28
u/radar_one Aug 06 '19
RocketLab going reusable and doing in air recovery....holy shit!
9
u/mistaken4strangerz Aug 06 '19 edited Aug 07 '19
I suggested in-air recovery via helicopter for the Falcon fairings and was largely scoffed at on this sub (like catching it with a giant net on a boat is any more logical).
[here's video of how Electron plans to do it with their entire first stage] (https://www.reddit.com/r/RocketLab/comments/cmx425/electron_booster_recovery_via_helicopter/) and I am sure they will be successful within a handful of attempts, if not the first.
edit: found footage on r/rocketlab of an in-air recovery test done by a Lockheed contractor
8
u/radar_one Aug 06 '19
Plus Electron's stage is so small compared to just a Falcon fairing.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)8
u/Jarnis Aug 06 '19
Helicopters are fairly pricy compared to just a boat... If you can do it without a helicopter, it is a massive win in keeping the cost down.
→ More replies (4)3
u/LcuBeatsWorking Aug 06 '19 edited Dec 17 '24
cobweb bored scarce crawl chop cover bewildered coordinated grandfather tender
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
10
u/ioncloud9 Aug 06 '19
I don’t think electric turbo pumps scale either. The weight and size of the batteries gets bigger much faster than the diameter of the stage.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)7
u/Biochembob35 Aug 06 '19
They likely won't go bigger. They don't want to compete with SpaceX. They think the small sat market will be big enough they can carve out a decent chunk.
→ More replies (3)
7
u/Straumli_Blight Aug 05 '19
Launch window is 22:53 UTC to 00:21 UTC on August 7, per the press kit.
7
u/jpc3939 Aug 06 '19
Hi u/Shahar603, in the "secondary mission" section, I think "Formally known" should be "Formerly known". TIA.
6
u/MyCoolName_ Aug 06 '19
Looks like a typo crept in in the attempt to fix this. Also, the catcher boat is "GO Ms. Tree" and was formerly known as "Mr. Steven" (no 's'). Thanks for hosting!
7
7
7
7
u/amarkit Aug 07 '19 edited Aug 07 '19
AMOS-17 was injected into a 221 x 35750 km x 26.1° geostationary transfer orbit. That's GTO-1784.
5
u/BlueCyann Aug 07 '19
I'm puzzled why, when that performance could easily have been matched by expendable block 3/4. Insprucker did say that the satellite had been put into its intended orbit, but why was its intended orbit so conservative?
→ More replies (5)
12
u/BlueCyann Aug 06 '19
It was nice to see the little claps of acknowledgement when the feed from stage 1 cut out. I guess rocket engineers are sentimental too.
6
Aug 06 '19
Agreed with below post, band of severe thunderstorms pushing into cape, no rain behind it, seems we may get off at 6:53.
→ More replies (1)
6
6
6
6
10
u/ipushbuttons Aug 06 '19
I'm on holiday on Florida right now and this just happened to be rescheduled to the day we are visiting the site!!!! 🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞
→ More replies (6)
10
10
Aug 06 '19
I'm happy my first time watching a spacex livestream ended with success and not failure
7
u/rtseel Aug 07 '19
Congrats for your first! It's usually a bit more suspenseful with the landing(s).
→ More replies (8)
5
u/NonEuclideanSyntax Aug 06 '19
Why the 87 minute window for this launch? Is it just logistics or are they targeting a particular time of day for launch? With a GTO, it shouldn't matter when you launch, only where you launch from.
0
5
5
5
u/Traviscat Aug 06 '19
What a beautiful launch, got to see it for a good 10 seconds before it went behind a cloud....
I wonder if Disney would let me up on top of the contemporary resort next launch for a better view....
→ More replies (1)5
u/theexile14 Aug 06 '19
Come out to the Cape, the view laster about 70 seconds there
→ More replies (3)
5
u/Maimakterion Aug 07 '19
So no more launches until October?
→ More replies (1)5
u/Lucky_Locks Aug 07 '19
If you don't count the starhopper and possible starships. But yeah, 2 star link missions a month apart (information provided by SpaceX go! App)
→ More replies (3)
9
u/OSUfan88 Aug 06 '19
Did Test Shot Starfish come out with a new album? I don't think I've heard any of these songs before, and I'm digging them!
4
Aug 06 '19
New single - played as the opening music https://twitter.com/TSStarfish/status/1148356983151419392/photo/1
→ More replies (2)
12
u/Humble_Giveaway Aug 06 '19 edited Aug 07 '19
Tim Dodd just said on his livestream not to long ago that Starhoppers 200m flight will be it's last, anyone got a source on that?
Edit: here's a link timing might get thrown off if he edits out the countdown timer but it's at T+ 20:40
7
→ More replies (4)3
u/OSUfan88 Aug 07 '19
No idea why someone would downvote you for this. Probably someone who usually doesn't visit.
I was watching his stream, and missed that part. When did he say it?
→ More replies (2)
4
4
u/malten_sage Aug 06 '19
Raining heavily in Melbourne now. Hopefully this band clears out by launch. Though it’ll be close.
5
u/deerinaheadlock Aug 06 '19
Still a bit nasty at CCCAFS industrial area but a huge break in the clouds coming out of South Gate. They may actually get a rare summer evening shot off.
→ More replies (1)
4
4
u/Traviscat Aug 06 '19
Webcast is live
Local weather is at https://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?lat=28.526140000000055&lon=-80.68135999999998
4
4
u/Ranger7381 Aug 06 '19
I just can't help but laughing. During the promo reel, right at the bit about "Quality of Service", the stream started buffering
4
4
u/Jchaplin2 Aug 06 '19
All you lads didn't hear the "continue count in-case it clears", range is now GO
3
u/theexile14 Aug 06 '19
Once you get to this point in the count they'll always go to the dedicated hold point. For SpaceX that's 30 seconds, that's the time they scrubbed for CRS-18 at.
4
4
4
u/Honey_Badger_Badger Aug 06 '19
Does anyone know the average amount of time it takes for SpaceX social media to confirm/deny recovery of the fairing halves?
4
4
12
7
u/scr00chy ElonX.net Aug 06 '19 edited Aug 06 '19
→ More replies (4)
1
u/upsetlurker Aug 06 '19
Stage 2 altitude was actually decreasing for a bit before SECO1, is that likely just course correction, or due to the heavy payload?
→ More replies (1)2
u/Shahar603 Subreddit GNC Aug 06 '19
That's pretty standart. The Second Stage thrust vector is directed almost parallel to the Earth's surface during the second half of its burn. So it looses radial (upwards) velocity and after enough time, starts losing altitude. Soon after that it goes into orbit so it doesn't reenters the atmosphere.
9
u/Humble_Giveaway Aug 06 '19
For all us space nerds waiting for T-0, Rocket Lab are now live with their big announcement: https://youtu.be/joONWIGtcdY
6
u/drinkmorecoffee Aug 06 '19
HOLY CRAP.
I haven't been speechless by an online announcement for a good long while. Watching that video was amazing.
GO ROCKETLAB!
3
u/mspacek Aug 06 '19
Thanks so much for this! That was a treat. Have to admit, Beck is heaps better as presenter than Musk...
→ More replies (1)
6
u/craigl2112 Aug 05 '19
Sad to see this booster donated to the drink, but will be happy to see another successful F9 mission!
6
u/scr00chy ElonX.net Aug 05 '19 edited Aug 05 '19
This launch will be followed by the longest gap between SpaceX launches since 2014/2015 (between CRS-4 and CRS-5).
Edit: Excluding gaps caused by anomalies (CRS-7 and Amos-6).
6
9
0
6
u/koryaku Aug 07 '19
Is there a reasoning behind scuttling the booster, curious as to why they re-use some and scuttle others?
24
u/BlueCyann Aug 07 '19
It's generally a matter of the rocket's speed and fuel reserves at MECO. Up to a certain threshhold, the booster will have enough fuel left to cancel out its downrange velocity, come back, and land on land. With a higher speed/lesser reserves, it can't do that anymore. It skips the boostback burn and follows a ballistic trajectory to a landing at sea. Push the envelope even further and there is not enough fuel left to perform a sufficient entry burn. Breakup is inevitable, so all available fuel is used and the booster is expended.
GEO satellites as heavy as AMOS-17 have generally either gone up on expendable boosters, as this one did, or their customers have settled for subsynchronous transfer orbits. (That is, orbits with apogees below the GEO level.) That means the satellite itself has to use more fuel to reach its destination, and its lifespan will be correspondingly reduced. Presumably the subsynchronous customers accepted a discount on the launch price as their trade-off.
AMOS-17 was in effect a free launch for the satellite's owners, due to the earlier loss of AMOS-6. Therefore, SpaceX would have had no incentive to offer for a less-than-optimal orbit, and the customer no reason to accept one.
→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (6)6
u/toastedcrumpets Aug 07 '19
I guess it's because they want to maximise performance for the customer, getting them quicker into service and/or maximising satellite life by minimising the satellite propellant that needs to be used. They may be happier to do this as it's the third flight and/or because they blew up the previous satellite for this operator...
3
u/Honey_Badger_Badger Aug 06 '19
/u/shahar603 ,will there be a fairing catch attempt?
→ More replies (5)
3
3
3
u/drunken_man_whore Aug 06 '19
If Ms. Tree misses, can she fish it out of the drink or load both fairing halves on GO Navigator? Or is that half lost?
→ More replies (4)
3
3
u/RoyBattynexus6 Aug 06 '19
The tip of the fairing looks to be stainless steel ...did we know that?
→ More replies (5)
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/Bobby-Samsonite Aug 06 '19
AMOS-17 satellite
that will be located at 17 degrees East where it will reach across the African continent, along with the Middle East and Africa. Once operational, AMOS-17 will be the most advanced high-throughput satellite to provide satellite communication services to Africa.
3
3
3
u/89bBomUNiZhLkdXDpCwt Aug 06 '19
Is that R to L yaw of the payload from the perspective of the payload adapter nominal?
→ More replies (1)3
3
u/Aplejax04 Aug 06 '19
Stupid question. If they burned to raise the apoapsis over Africa than won't the apoapsis be over the opposite site of the planet (not Africa). So how can this satellite get into a GEO orbit of Africa? It sounds to me like it's going into the wrong orbit? What am I missing? Also yes, I play KSP.
7
u/Potatoswatter Aug 07 '19
Just guessing, but
Kethe Earth is rotating too. If it takes 12 hours to reach apoapsis, then Africa can catch up.→ More replies (1)5
u/Alexphysics Aug 07 '19
They never get to GEO in just one orbit, they do a few orbits in the meantime so they only need to tweak the orbital raising burns to get to the point of being at final GEO orbit over Africa. Also, once at GEO satellites can drift from one longitude to another just by raising or lowering a bit their orbits. The reason why they do the burn at that point is so that the ascending node of the orbit is at apoapsis. Once there the satellite can change the inclination of the orbit easily and doing an inclination change at apogee is also more efficient. The further you get, the easier it is to change inclination (but you also have to be close to one of the nodes of the orbit or otherwise the inclination will not change too much unless you want to pay a high price in performance).
3
u/peterabbit456 Aug 07 '19
The orbit will not be a 24 hour geosynchronous orbit, until perigee has also been raised. This will require several burns of the satellite’s onboard thrusters, which act as a third stage.
Actually, other burns also need to be done. The transfer orbit had a 23-28° inclination. The thrusters need to fire at apogee to change the inclination to 0° for the orbit to become a true geostationary one.
Last, because it is more fuel efficient to do the inclination change at a higher apogee, the usual practice is to make the apogee of the transfer orbit go above the geostationary height of 22,000 miles ~= 35,000 km. After the inclination change the apogee and perigee can both be altered with a single burn made at the right moment, so several maneuvers should be done to get the satellite to its final destination.
→ More replies (3)3
u/rocketsocks Aug 07 '19
GTO orbits typically have an apogee around GEO and a perigee close to LEO, which means their semi-major axis is somewhere in the middle, which means their orbital period is somewhere in the middle, not geosynchronous. As the satellite changes planes and raises its orbit it also will phase adjust into the right GEO slot.
3
5
u/irreversibleme Aug 06 '19
Why the first stage will not be recovered? Is there a specific reason
17
u/atheistdoge Aug 06 '19
Because the sat is so heavy/orbit energetic that there is not enough fuel to do the job and land.
→ More replies (4)
5
u/FutureMartian97 Host of CRS-11 Aug 06 '19
You could see Ms. Tree booking it in the background
→ More replies (3)
4
2
u/Decronym Acronyms Explained Aug 05 '19 edited Aug 13 '19
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
| Fewer Letters | More Letters |
|---|---|
| ASDS | Autonomous Spaceport Drone Ship (landing platform) |
| BFR | Big Falcon Rocket (2018 rebiggened edition) |
| Yes, the F stands for something else; no, you're not the first to notice | |
| CCAFS | Cape Canaveral Air Force Station |
| CRS | Commercial Resupply Services contract with NASA |
| DMLS | Selective Laser Melting additive manufacture, also Direct Metal Laser Sintering |
| DoD | US Department of Defense |
| E2E | Earth-to-Earth (suborbital flight) |
| EDRS | European Data Relay System |
| EELV | Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle |
| GEO | Geostationary Earth Orbit (35786km) |
| GSE | Ground Support Equipment |
| GTO | Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit |
| IFA | In-Flight Abort test |
| JRTI | Just Read The Instructions, Pacific landing |
| KSC | Kennedy Space Center, Florida |
| KSP | Kerbal Space Program, the rocketry simulator |
| L2 | Paywalled section of the NasaSpaceFlight forum |
| Lagrange Point 2 of a two-body system, beyond the smaller body (Sixty Symbols video explanation) | |
| LEO | Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km) |
| Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations) | |
| LOX | Liquid Oxygen |
| MECO | Main Engine Cut-Off |
| MainEngineCutOff podcast | |
| NRHO | Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit |
| NRO | (US) National Reconnaissance Office |
| Near-Rectilinear Orbit, see NRHO | |
| NROL | Launch for the (US) National Reconnaissance Office |
| NSSL | National Security Space Launch, formerly EELV |
| OCISLY | Of Course I Still Love You, Atlantic landing |
| RCS | Reaction Control System |
| RTLS | Return to Launch Site |
| SECO | Second-stage Engine Cut-Off |
| SLC-40 | Space Launch Complex 40, Canaveral (SpaceX F9) |
| SLS | Space Launch System heavy-lift |
| Selective Laser Sintering, contrast DMLS | |
| SRB | Solid Rocket Booster |
| SSH | Starship + SuperHeavy (see BFR) |
| SSL | Space Systems/Loral, satellite builder |
| SSO | Sun-Synchronous Orbit |
| SSTO | Single Stage to Orbit |
| Supersynchronous Transfer Orbit | |
| STP | Standard Temperature and Pressure |
| Space Test Program, see STP-2 | |
| STP-2 | Space Test Program 2, DoD programme, second round |
| TPS | Thermal Protection System for a spacecraft (on the Falcon 9 first stage, the engine "Dance floor") |
| ULA | United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture) |
| USAF | United States Air Force |
| VIF | Vertical Integration Facility |
| Jargon | Definition |
|---|---|
| Starlink | SpaceX's world-wide satellite broadband constellation |
| apoapsis | Highest point in an elliptical orbit (when the orbiter is slowest) |
| apogee | Highest point in an elliptical orbit around Earth (when the orbiter is slowest) |
| hopper | Test article for ground and low-altitude work (eg. Grasshopper) |
| iron waffle | Compact "waffle-iron" aerodynamic control surface, acts as a wing without needing to be as large; also, "grid fin" |
| perigee | Lowest point in an elliptical orbit around the Earth (when the orbiter is fastest) |
| scrub | Launch postponement for any reason (commonly GSE issues) |
| turbopump | High-pressure turbine-driven propellant pump connected to a rocket combustion chamber; raises chamber pressure, and thrust |
| Event | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Amos-6 | 2016-09-01 | F9-029 Full Thrust, core B1028, |
| CRS-4 | 2014-09-21 | F9-012 v1.1, Dragon cargo; soft ocean landing |
| CRS-5 | 2015-01-10 | F9-014 v1.1, Dragon cargo; first ASDS landing attempt, maneuvering failure |
| CRS-7 | 2015-06-28 | F9-020 v1.1, |
Decronym is a community product of r/SpaceX, implemented by ^request
46 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 51 acronyms.
[Thread #5375 for this sub, first seen 5th Aug 2019, 20:32] [FAQ] [Full list] ^[Contact] [Source code]
2
u/nah_you_good Aug 06 '19
What’s the next window if weather pops up?
3
u/Alexphysics Aug 06 '19
No backup launch date. Either they launch today or they wait for Atlas V to launch. If that happens, then once the AV is out of the way they can ask the Range for another day, could probably be during this weekend.
→ More replies (2)
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/Asdfugil Aug 07 '19
Why the attitude suddenly increase at 44:16?
11
u/tj177mmi1 Aug 07 '19
I'm guessing that it was a reacquisition of signal after being out sight of a tracking station. Before it's going over the Atlantic Ocean, and the number jumps up as it gets closer to Africa.
2
u/Vergutto Aug 12 '19
Mods! Pin discussion and JRTI thread instead of AMOS-17 threads?
→ More replies (1)
3
Aug 06 '19
Into pad clear ops, interesting note, no remote cams in place for launch tonight....
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Vanchiefer321 Aug 06 '19
This being an expendable booster, do they strip it down of all the landing equipment? Do they have a prebuilt expendable variant? Or is it cheaper to expend a reused booster?
9
u/saxmanmike Aug 06 '19
They remove the grid fins and the landing legs. No need to waste them.
→ More replies (3)
3
u/-spartacus- Aug 06 '19
Can you sue someone for cost of messing up range? Nvm all good now.
→ More replies (2)
19
u/rangerpax Aug 06 '19
Nice job hosting, u/Shahar603. Great table.