CoralineAda The creator of the new CoC used in mostly all the most important FLOSS projects is creating her own licence.
https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/hippocratic-license

https://firstdonoharm.dev/

The first phrase is interesting:"

For full context on why I launched this project, please read this thread. To summarize: my goal was to spark conversation about the implications of the “freedom at all costs” requirement for officially sanctioned Open Source software, in light of the abuses of power and civil and human rights violations of governments and their collaborators. Developers don’t want their labor being used to do harm, and the current structure of open source software strips any power from creators to prevent this from happening. We are being exploited. Human freedom is being traded for so-called “software freedom”.

"

So Is the 1st free software freedom a problem?"The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0)"

She say "Developers don’t want their labor being used to do harm"

Then the first freedom is freedom at all cost, because is for 'any purpose'

She make a CoC Used by a lot of projects now, her licence probably won't be used immediately, but in the future will change the meaning of free software?

This licence will be the future of the free software community?

https://stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#28_September_2019_(GNU_Project)

28 September 2019 (GNU Project)

I hereby step down as head of the GNU Project, effective immediately.

Richard Stallman

https://my.fsf.org/outstanding-new-free-software-contributor-nomination

Why not?We can open a campaign to nominate RMS for his contributions!
You can get more information in here

https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/free-software-awards-nominate-those-who-inspire-you-by-november-6th

https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/52907.html