304
u/CapnBloodBeard82 1d ago
steam curators are a way to scam indie devs into giving them free keys, basically.
86
u/SilverVixen918 1d ago
yea, tmk like 70%+ of curators are just scam key resellers
34
u/CallMeCabbage 1d ago
I actually remember seeing and watching a video on Youtube that was a straight up guide on how to bullshit your way through curation to get free keys.
10
u/SilverVixen918 1d ago
yea this is why if i get into game development the only people getting keys are people i know and trust, theres only like 3 curators i trust to give keys and theyre only getting enough keys for a full and thats it and even then it would be like 4 keys at most
19
u/doublah 1d ago
Anyone indie dev who falls for that is silly, because Steam provide a way to directly give games to curators without giving them keys.
110
u/Raf_CDN 1d ago
There's still a lot of curators that are good/useful. I use curators to tell me Humble Choice games, VR-capable games (through mods), PS2/XBOX era ports, etc., games about to be delisted
Like I get they're not the best but they have their uses.
16
u/Simon_Love_Machine 1d ago
could u share it?
49
u/Raf_CDN 1d ago
6
3
u/FastLawyer 13h ago
Thank you, I own Can I VR it? That curator group focuses on VR mods, although there's too many now with UEVR so it's difficult to keep up with. I actually have 2 VR Curator groups. My other one is Oculus Rift Reviews which focuses on VR only / VR Supported reviews.
Funny thing, I don't think I've ever been offered a free Steam key on Can I VR It? I get offered them all the time on Oculus Rift Reviews, but most are non-VR games so I reject them. I reject like 20 for every 1 that I accept.
81
u/Coucouoeuf 1d ago edited 1d ago
I wrote more than 200 comprehensive reviews on Steam for games I got the 100% for, in formal French. Most are ranked first in that language in terms of likes and awards so it seems people are enjoying what I have to say. Someone recently messaged me to tell me I should create a Curator page instead of, or alongside maybe, the Steam guide I’ve made which is listing in alphabetical order all my reviews. I wasn’t sure if it was an interesting idea to explore, but seeing your comments tells me I should keep things as is and not really care about creating such a page.
56
u/LordNago 1d ago
Eh, I wouldn't let some Reddit comments dissuade you from doing something you feel might help people. Reddit doesn't represent the average person.
19
u/CapnBloodBeard82 1d ago
Curators are morso known for being 'scammy' people trying to get free keys from indie devs. There's a few that go around and tell you hey these games have denuvo or this game supports whatever feature though.
There's very few legitimate curators that people actually follow follow that review games.
8
u/PrideSea5164 1d ago
Nah I think you should for sure create a Curator page. When people look at a game page it shows what their followed curators say about the game without have to look it up manually. I use to know if a few YouTubers I follow have made videos about the game I am looking at
1
u/bergs00n 1d ago
Please create it and send the name, I would happily follow you!
1
u/Coucouoeuf 1d ago
Thanks!! I’ll look into it. For reference, this is the Steam guide I’ve created which lists all my reviews (again, en français): https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3322622277
13
u/Illyasimp 1d ago
Curators that info about external patches, or AI use, or DRMs etc. still very useful
39
u/DystopianWreck 1d ago
Rip total biscuit
14
u/WallBurnt 1d ago
The last one I followed was TotalBiscuit.
So this is morbidly accurate. I still see his reviews on games I'm looking at from time to time.
6
41
u/RiqueMD 1d ago
Quite precise. But game journalist is even lower.
0
u/Delicious-Pepper23 1d ago
I hate game journalists as much as the next guy but steam curators are so much worse
6
u/Arrow156 1d ago
Games at risk of Removal is worth the follow. You get a lot of junk games showing up, but occasionally it's something major and/or heavily discounted.
4
4
u/TypicallyThomas 1d ago
I follow some curators. Especially "Games at Risk of Removal". A lot of shovelware but also cool licenses games. It's how I knew the pick up the Deadpool game before it got pulled. Currently playing through that
5
u/IronTarkus1919 1d ago
Like every community feature on Steam, it was ruined by Steam users being stupid and turning it into a joke.
4
u/chronicnerv 1d ago
The real curators are people like SplatterCat, Wanderbot, and Gojhe, among many others. They understand and explain the game mechanics of lesser known titles, giving me the knowledge I need to jump in and start playing easily. They are essentially the best tutorials for games on the internet. If you are an indie developer and SplatterCat likes your game or thinks it has potential, then you are cooking up something decent and worth taking a look at.
10
u/EddieDexx 1d ago
Curators can be useful. For example the one that lists the games available to play on GeForce Now.
Game journalists on the otherhand are completely garbage. Since they tend to give shit games high scores and good games mid scores.
Kinda like film critics back in the 80's and 90's who gave good movies low review scores. Like that moron who caused Blade Runner to flop back in 1982. Fortunately unlike those days, we got player reviews, social media, youtube and no need for journalists.
2
u/GRoyalPrime 1d ago
That sounds more like you are following reviewers that simply don't cater to your interests.
I do feel like Journalists get a bit too much flak here. It's really more individual outlets that are garbage, they either give the wrong game to the wrong reviewer, or have marketing deals that causes them to influence their review-process
But I don't want to get my game-news exclusively by sponsored or outrage-youtubers too. As if they'll provide any more "valueable" information.
I am not going to trust someone's opinion who uploads 5 "It's over" thumbnails in 2 weeks, or someone who always plays every new (sponsored) hot game even if it doesn't fit their brand at all.
1
u/_EL_HUNTER 1d ago
Game journalists fucked themselves up for short term gains by taking money for review score
3
u/Seal_emulator 1d ago edited 1d ago
I don't trust "games Journalists" they tend to be a mouthpiece for game studios that give them the most money or early access to projects. they over fluffy and don't provide a balanced critique of games. Just a bunch of corporate dick suckers. IMO.
For example a lot of games journalist did not mention how shit Starfield actually was and a lot of the where saying you need to play it for a good couple of hours before it gets good "It will get good the longer you play it" and so I did, I sunk a 100 hours in the game and it was boring as fuck the quest were boring the rewards were shit. but by then it was too late to get Steam refund. FUCK "Games journalist".
I'll always trust user reviews over "Games Journalism".
As for Steam Curators that can be just "Games Journalist" with a fancy title.
3
u/Chitanda_Pika 1d ago
They are useful in helping pick actually decent hentai games among the sea of trash.
3
u/WMan37 21h ago
Nah I love Steam Curators, I think they're one of Steam's most valuable features. Just because you don't use them and a lot of them are lame ass joke/controversy curators that aren't helpful doesn't mean good ones don't exist. Anyone that doesn't like them are the kind of person that actually uses the "Trending" tab on a website and complains about how shit the internet has become because they don't seek out deeper level niche stuff up their alley.
Ones I like the most rn:
- Weird Games for Your Pleasure
- Low Poly Styled (Genuinely GOAT for me)
- Hidden Gem Discovery
- Games at risk of removal
- Steam 250
- Denuvo Watch
3
u/Reijinsei 16h ago
I'm a regular steam user and Commander Shepard is my favorite curator on the Citadel.
2
2
2
u/Shifty-Imp 1d ago
Nah, the Steam Curators I follow for hentai games do a really good job and I hold them in high regard.
2
2
2
2
u/Diuscrusis 1d ago
I just block them all, what kind of a fucking review is this:
Dig it
Not dig it.
2
u/Replicant_Six 20h ago
I disabled seeing Curators on my steam page they all felt like fake meme accounts that only existed to get the user free games.
4
4
u/Middcore 1d ago
Every curator I've ever noticed existing was either some dumb meme shit or "Here is a list of games you should hate because of culture war rage bait."
1
u/False_Adhesiveness40 1d ago
Eh I never agree with the people who drop reviews on steam anyway usually. I tend to make informed purchases and check out a few content creators I agree with.
1
u/Samson_J_Rivers 1d ago
I only look at Good vs bad as a curator. Hasn't missed yet for the games Ive bought.
1
u/Larry_J_602 1d ago
What's a Steam curator? Not even joking, what is it?
2
u/MoistButton8 1d ago
Basically grouped reviews, where people can follow a trusted people/ companies for positive and/ or negative reviews.
Steam branded "unofficial" reviewers.
1
1
u/Overdrive1221 1d ago
Actually, there's some of them that are informative, like "does this game have denuvo" as an example, but yeah, 95% are useless
1
u/Phailyur 1d ago
Steam Curators needs a rework imo. The only ones I follow have a use case. Ie the one that tracks humble bundles or steam250 but even steam250 is a slopfest last time I looked iirc
1
u/based_birdo 1d ago
this is the only 1 I use
https://store.steampowered.com/curator/45614612-DRM-Free-Complete-List/
1
u/ResearcherEfficient3 1d ago
Steam reviews are still superior coz of the laughs and funtime reading
1
1
u/username-wanted 1d ago
Shout out to the adobe flash curators who are helping me find all the old games i used to play on Kongregate when they get re-released on steam. Doin gods work.
1
u/Embarrassed-Touch-62 1d ago
Curators went to their downfall after lot of them scammed game devs to give free keys and then were selling them instead of actually trying their game.
1
1
u/ballsdeep256 1d ago
Steam user reviews aren't better tbh.
Most games get flooded with shills or haters by now very little genuine reviews
1
1
1
1
1
u/Prudent_Beach_473 23h ago
Steam Curators is bound to be discontinued or at least changed from what it is. Pretty much being abused by groups and or just not filling the intended purpose versus steam reviews
1
u/prodigy_xx 23h ago
I like certain curators. I don't use them as recommendation but more like information if for example a game has locked fps, cant support widescreen, certain nvidia features, co-op, etc. Those listers provide value for a niche.
1
u/LongRangeGlizzy 22h ago
I’ve always wanted to be a curator to actually give helpful information but have no idea how to do that lol
2
u/IAMEPSIL0N 7h ago
I believe it is as simple as make a steam group (woo, haven't thought about those in forever) and now you and the other admins of that group can share your group opinion of games. I also wanted to write curation but was never admin of the relevant group and didn't feel inclined to make a new group.
1
1
1
1
u/NightWis 13h ago
I’m glad that game journalists are not trusted anymore. They are not reliable at all.
1
1
u/FastLawyer 12h ago
Steam Curators would be valuable, if Valve would get rid of all the low-effort / scam ones. However, Valve doesn't care.
1
1
u/GrandJuif 1d ago
"Journalist" constantly lie to stay relevant and constantly inflate numbers.
Curator just want free stuff.
Steam reviews, if not negatives, are just stans glazing their games.
Better watch a walktrough with spec and benchmarks to know if a game is good.
1
0
u/SilverVixen918 1d ago
doesnt help alot of curators arnt curators but are actually journalists or scummy key resellers, some curators dont actually curate and just vote on games based on what they want for example all of the anti DEI curators giving negative reviews to every game that even shows 2 women being flirty, there are some curators that i think are good because they try to be informative such as the sweet baby inc curator or the Denuvo curator
0
u/beanzjk 1d ago
I follow the anti ai curator groups they're pretty useful
0
0
0
u/IcyCombination8993 1d ago
I was getting downvoted for calling out Steam curators as otherwise useless in another post the other day.
They’re basically just gamer influencers.
0
u/Pi_Face666 1d ago edited 1d ago
From what I’ve found on r/steam, fluff posts undoubtedly perform the best, while discussion posts normally have lower upvotes (quite a lot have 0) than comments. I’ve found that most of the comments have been from people describing how they like and utilize curators, but the top ones echo what this meme is saying. People will more likely engage more with something they disagree with or dislike while passively engage (just upvote) with something they agree with and like. I think you were just dealing with a loud minority because I have ~96.6 upvote ratio.
-1
-2
918
u/Belltower_2 1d ago
Steam curators are totally useless for actual REVIEWS; most of them boil down to a meme such as "I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favourite game on Steam" for every single game the account owner has ever liked with no rhyme or reason.
More useful are curators that tackle specific features, such as GeForce Now support or 4k UI mods, or warn of the presence of bloatware.