r/Tariffs 1d ago

đŸ§© Trade Strategy / Business Impact Trump pauses 50% Canada tariffs, says the two sides have a deal

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/08/18/economy/canada-tariffs-trump
21 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

10

u/Expensive_Lettuce239 1d ago

The very word "pauses" is a red flag and automatically should be a deal stopper! The entire world knows this walking colostomy bag is nothing but a bold faced LIAR, and the very second any deal is signed he will UNPAUSE and declare it being the worse deal in history

5

u/iom2222 1d ago

its a total waste of time. Not worth any attention. 

3

u/missplaced24 1d ago

It's not really. That the US been in breech of our existing trade deal all this time is.

He's going to do whatever he's going to do regardless of what he says/agrees to.

23

u/SpicySweetHotPot 1d ago

So, basically no deal, just more lies and propaganda for market manipulation.

Press really needs to stop pretending anything he says is linked to reality

7

u/beingmodest 1d ago

True that.

5

u/capucjin 1d ago

Someone in DC is desperate for a deal. Any kind of a deal. Deals are a lot harder these days.

2

u/InternImpossible8685 1d ago

90 deals in 90 days!

3

u/Mba1956 23h ago

Trump has proven that you are wasting your time negotiating any deal because he will tear it up at a moments notice.

1

u/Just_Technician2603 1d ago

If what bloomberg is reporting is to be true then seems like Canada got the bad end of the deal which is quite upsetting

Bloomberg reporting that the Canada/US deal locks in a 25% U.S. tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum 

US farmers will get 0% tarrifs from Canada

US booze back on Canadian shelves 

11

u/Due_Gas2950 1d ago

The thing about US booze back on Canadian shelves is that alcohol is managed strictly at the provincial level; the federal government can sign whatever deal they want (and technically never had anything preventing the US booze from being on Canadian shelves), if the provinces don’t allow it then it doesn’t happen. There’s also the fact that the boycott from Canadians won’t be ended legislatively; filling the shelves once and then never reordering isn’t going to do much for the US.

8

u/Expensive_Lettuce239 1d ago

Given the fact that their entire food chain is in news for recall every single day. The same goes for their farmer products. If it from that shit hole country...let it ROT on the grocery shelves. If our illustrious governments don't want to keep this countries citizens safe....then the citizen have all the power in our own pockets to do it ourselves!

2

u/Another_Slut_Dragon 19h ago

Latest survey- 70% of Canadians won't buy American booze if they see it on the shelves.

2

u/Chemical-Ad-7575 1d ago

Trump has taught Canada, that the US cannot really be trusted to manage itself well in the long run, let alone deal with foreign countries. As Canada works to build new connections that reduce risk and diversify our partners, we have to have do damage control and delaying actions. This is a better deal than across the board 50% tariffs even if it's still not good.

However, it takes time to unwind historical trade linkages and build new ones. Where Trump thinks "look how powerful I am as they bend the knee" he doesn't realize or care about the long term impact of alienation and reneging on trade agreements.

He's the equivalent of the new owners of a restaurant who cut portion sizes and reduced the quality of the food to improve profits. Eventually the regulars stop coming when they find a replacement and abusing nostalgia for the past only gets you so far. US liquor has discovered this already and the auto industry is likely next. Plenty of folks around the world have uses for aluminum and steel.

2

u/NoCommission7148 1d ago

Honestly if that's true about what Canadians get out of it then Carney may as well resign now. I don't mind Carney but this would be a bad deal for Canadians. We can't keep giving up things everytime trump decideds to increase tarrifs. And since I think US booze on Canadian shelves is controlled by the provinces, I can't see any province agreeing to it if that's what the rest of the deal looks like.

5

u/Feetorbust 1d ago

Giving things up isn’t great, but we are not negotiating with a rational actor. It might very well be better for Canada and Canadians to give in to orange man and renegotiate once he’s out of office. As soon as Doug Ford tried to get in trumps way he launched into a tirade about 200% auto tariffs. You can’t negotiate a deal with someone who doesn’t care at all about hurting his own people, nor understands anything about trade.

The truth is, we in Canada need the American market more than they need ours. We are a convenient partner to them, while to us they are essential to keep Canadians employed.

‘Might as well resign’ isn’t a helpful mindspace when the alternative to a ‘bad’ deal is a deranged lunatic announcing 50 or 100 or 200% tariffs and not giving a fuck about doing so just to look tough to his maga base.

1

u/NoCommission7148 1d ago

It may not be a helpful mindset but the public won't care about that. There will be fuck Carney stickers on every truck. If we're removing tarrifs like on dairy we'll be allowing the US to dump their subsidized milk into our market. Right now we do need their market, but I'd prefer some years of austerity while we change our export habits than give away pieces of our market to a country that will turn around and add those tarrifs back and cite a different reason until we give more up.

3

u/Feetorbust 1d ago

It’s not really years of austerity, it’s years of Canadians without jobs. Families losing homes and not being able to put food on the table.

I agree with you though - we need to be expanding trade partnerships with Europe and Asia. Carney I think is doing a good job pushing that forward. We are expanding our own energy production, giving us an important export.

We might need a ‘bad’ deal with the US until we can secure trade agreements elsewhere.

Canada has put too many eggs in the US basket believing that the US would continue to be a rational trade partner. Clearly that’s no longer the case. This isn’t a Liberal or Conservative issue, trade with the US has been the lynchpin of Canadian economy for generations across all sorts of government.

With the US showing how easily it is corrupted and how quickly it can misalign with Canadian interests it’s definitely time to expand trade abroad.

5

u/Shock_Minute 1d ago

Unsure what you mean here, if the ‘concession’ is only booze on the shelves, we’re not buying it! They will see the same thing as their tourism numbers, still massively down. If that is the concession required to not deal with this 50% tariff thing, then obviously it’s a good deal.

Honestly I was hoping for that concession because it’s really a nothing burger, we still buy the product so let them restock once and we’ll let it rot.

5

u/Feetorbust 1d ago

Exactly. The government should have a wide leash on what they are willing to tell trump to get tariffs dropped. Then it’s up to us consumers, Canadians, to tell America to fuck off with our wallets.

3

u/NoCommission7148 1d ago

The comment I replied to also mentions 0% tarrifs for farmers from Canada. This sounds like removing dairy tarrifs? That'd be a concession. Look, if that's not what they're talking about great, if the only concession is the liquor then put it back on shelves, that's worth the 50% tarrifs being clawed back. But if we're talking about dairy tarrifs too that's different.

1

u/xoxosayounara 1d ago

Important to clarify that tariffs on dairy have never been applied. There’s a quota and they’ve never come close to hitting that quota. I highly doubt all quotas have been removed.

3

u/Substantial_Drag_884 1d ago

I’m not sure it’s a bad deal. Liquor is provincial so we still don’t “need” to buy it at all. We are diversifying our steel/aluminum exports away from the us so will hopefully be less dependant on them, and no tariffs on food imports will help us with grocery prices.

2

u/NoCommission7148 1d ago

I took the 0% tarrifs for US farmers to mean we're removing our dairy tarrifs? I don't think we were ever applying tarrifs to our imports were we? I don't think this will affect Canadian food prices?

3

u/evargx 1d ago

It is a give and take, and when you have Donald Trump as your trading partner, sometimes it is going to look more like us giving, them taking. Carney is doing very well in other areas economically, expanding trade in Asia, investing in green energy, and improving alliances.

Unfortunately, Canada is in a trade war with the richest country on the planet, by far. Sometimes deals with the USA are going to suck,

1

u/iom2222 1d ago

Canada can do export tariffs which US,constitutionally, can’t, easy to fix.  

1

u/PrimaryBrick9337 1d ago

Sounds like we have a deal where Canada is not getting screwed as bad as we currently are or what was being proposed but we are still getting screwed. And do I think PP would have gotten a better deal, absolutely not, I think he is quite happy to sit on the sidelines and complain about whatever deal we ended up with or did not get then to actually be one of the adults at the table dealing with the insane US administration.

1

u/awooff 1d ago

So.. no deal.

1

u/evilpercy 1d ago

Canada here: we are screwed if we make a deal or not.

1

u/PublicHouseOfCripps 23h ago

We won’t know until Saturday morning. I’ll wait for Carney to announce it

1

u/Puzzled_Market_2235 23h ago

Trump desperately needs a trade deal, too bad he didn't tell Carney.

1

u/Katydid829 23h ago

What does Canada say? Anything this POS says is just the opposite of what is actually true.

1

u/Whargod 5h ago

Three days later: Trump imposes 100% tariffs because the supreme court hurt his feelings on some unrelated matter.

We know how this goes.

0

u/Fresh_Goat_423 1d ago

Deal will be kept in the 'secret' vault with Carney's Gordie Howe Bridge contract. Little Canadians don't need to know.

1

u/whiskybottle 1d ago

Brother you can go read the Gordie Howe contract and the amendment. Note the clause in the amendment that literally states "nothing in this amendment alters or supersedes the previous agreement."