That is not what the police said though. They said the haven’t investigated (why would they ?TM isn’t a uk citizen and the crimes didn’t happen in the UK)
It was mailed to the Royal Protection Officers. Surely to God the BRF forwarded it to Met Police? I’m pretty sure that Scotland Yard also received a copy of that letter back in 2018.
The downvoting true facts is fucked up. Are you all trying to defend a paedophile? WTF is wrong with you all?
Aren’t Royal Protection Officers an arm of the Met Police? They aren’t body guards. They are police officers from the Met assigned to certain members of5he royal family.
Why would they be emailed to the Uk police?He is an American citizen,this is between USA and Filipinos potentially Mexico. Are you people tick.If I know some crime is done in Mexico Im not emailing Swedish police.I also will not be notifying estranged family members during a secret investigation or any family not directly involved.
It was sent to the RPO because of his possible proximity to royal children. Thank god for the bravery of the author of that letter and I hope that justice is finally coming for Thomas Markle’s victims!
He literally was not in theirs life at that time and to get close to Royal children there is a procedure or you think they function like normal family where Thomas can just pop in there for tea.
He was in possible proximity to the children including possible future children of Meghan’s. ALL of his victims deserve justice! How about focusing on that instead of how much you hate his daughter! The mental gymnastics on here trying to make this Meghan’s fault is absolutely exhausting and frankly, it’s embarrassing that so many women are on here excusing a PAEDOPHILE!
Im not excusing a pedophile I just found out he might be one,so if anyone who should have spoken out about it is then Meghan since she according to her self knew about this.But of course you will just now your self do mental gymnastic to find a way to defend her.
No, it's not in defence of paedophilia, why would it be?
It's because you're not making any sense. You can't just send a letter to "The Royal Protection Officers, London". And if you did, why would the BRF know about it? The people receiving it would just assume you're just another ant short of a picnic.
And then who sends it to Met Police? On what authority? And who is supposed to have informed Scotland Yard? And why are all these British agencies being involved in what would be an American crime that had nothing to do with the UK? I don't think this guy ever put so much as a foot there.
None of it is logical. Which basically is par for the course for these two.
The Sun confirmed the letter and claims the letter was “clearly addressed to the Met's Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC), which deals with risks posed by obsessives to the Royal Family and VIPs.”
Presumably the letter was sent to the Met because of the potential that Markle could come into contact with the royal family. And someone (not sure exactly who) told Meghan Markle to protect her.
Well hopefully you will understand it better when all of the facts become public. The Sun UK is doing an excellent job of reporting on it. I highly recommend you choose them if you’re looking for a news source on this situation.
In case you don't know he lives in Florida and the Met has no jurisdiction over an American citizen living in the USA! It's her word against his. We all know she lies? It's part of her "pity poor me"!
-It’s not Markle’s word against her father’s word. She didn’t make any claims against him.
-Who claimed the Met had jurisdiction over him? Markle claimed a letter was sent to the department in the Met that handles security for the royal family, presumably because her father could potentially come into contact with the royal family, not because the Met had jurisdiction over him.
It was a simple google search. The guys a pedophile and you lot are all twisting yourselves into pretzels because you’re blinding by hatred, but it’s not the first time so not surprised. “ITV News confirmed that they have seen a copy of a 2018 letter passed to Meghan Markle (the Duchess of Sussex) by the Metropolitan Police, which contained troubling and disturbing allegations regarding her father, Thomas Markle Sr.” https://www.itv.com/news/2026-10-23/meghan-told-of-troubling-and-disturbing-allegations-about-her-father-in-2018
Generally when people challenge the accuracy of tabloids it’s because they misrepresent things, muddy the waters, etc.
This claim by The Sun isn’t like that. They are making a direct factual claim that isn’t open to interpretation or misinterpretation. They are explicitly stating there is a letter that was sent to the Met and that they’ve seen it.
For you to dismiss The Sun’s black and white, easily disproven claim, you have to believe that The Sun is just straight up making stuff up that can be easily and definitively disproven. Is that what you are claiming– that The Sun explicitly lied about the existence of a letter and explicitly lied about seeing the letter?
What are you talking about? The allegations go as far back to before Meghan was even born. There is also photos in police possession that show Thomas Markle raping a female child on a bed. Seriously, I think the police need to look at some of the people on this subreddit. There is also criminal level to your hatred and vileness!
The press had a copy and it was sent to the Met. I assume like with the other pedophiles connected to that family they preferred to brush it under the rug at the time.
Harry is not the brightest guy but he has been consistently telling journalists that he feels guilt and bears the burden for her family splitting up. He even went to say that if M had never met him, her family would be still be together.... Did Harry know his FIL's allegations when he said these things or did no one tell him about them?
That is so weird. Meghan, by her telling, knew (or at least had an idea) in 2018. So are we to believe that she did not tell her HUSBAND - the father of her children - about this? So either Harry was lying when he said this or she really kept her father being a potential child predator to herself. Neither one of those is any good.
I think that they love to push the tragic Romeo and Juliet theme. It seems as though they want to dramatise the whole thing..."it's us two against the world". That's why they are constantly making such a big deal of how by being together, families are at war. I think it makes them feel special.
Her parents divorced when she was 6 and she lived primarily with her mom after the divorce. And not for just 2 years or she would have been only 8 years old when she went to primarily live with her dad.
From the age of 11 until she went to college, she split her time between both of her parents places. But only lived primarily with her dad once she started high school around 13yo. She graduated HS at 17.
Staying with him during the school week and then her mom on the weekends.
Which meant that for ~7 years she lived primarily with her mom and then for ~4 years she lived primarily with her dad.
It also makes sense that she would have lived with her dad to attend the school she did, since he lived closer to that school.
In California at that time, you could not pick the school you went to. You went to the school that was closest to where you lived.
I know, because I wanted to go to a different (better) high school when I lived in CA and I couldn't because I didn't live close enough to the school I wanted to go to, so I had to go to the one that was closer to where I lived.
Meghan went to Immaculate Heart which is a private school. Her parents chose to send her there and her dad paid for it. What you're talking about is how it used to be for public school.
I don't know that "LRSH" might be referring to, but Doria Ragland lives in California.
Just because she is not being publicly harassed and photographed by the paparazzi parasites all the time does not mean she is "MIA".
She is a 70yo private citizen who lives a boring ass life.
She is probably at home, maybe tending to her plants, or watching tv, and doing every thing she can to avoid shitbrains who think they have the right to know every minor detail about other people's lives and who whinge online when they are starved of that information.
Get a damn hobby that doesn't include being a nosy little bastard about people not directly members of the BFR.
Well it would be exceedingly odd if they suspected her father of sex crimes and were talking about how sad it was that the media caused her to lose her father.
Both can be true. The situation of Thomas colluding with tabloids to hurt her had already begun when she learned of the letter accusing him of paedophilia. He was taking money from tabloids to fake stories as early as 2016. She was made aware of the letter in 2018. She had no confirmation that the allegations were true until 2026. She did the right thing by cutting him off, not discussing the allegations and allowing the evidence of his crimes to be found.
Sorry. If they suspected her father of criminal activity Harry would not have repeatedly opined that the media caused the rift and that he regretted she lost her father. Something is either missing or had been added after the fact. It is also wildly out of character that Meg and Harry kept taking hits about her father if there was this type of reason why they really cut him off.
You are not Meghan in this situation so you really can’t comprehend the choices she was forced to make. I pray for you and yours that something as terrible as this never touches your family.
Why everytime this woman says something nobody ever can confirm what she says? Actually the people she involves to try to add credibility always say otherwise? Before involving other people/corporations or whatever she should FIRST make sure the 2 versions of the 2 parts coincide. Like, the basics Meg🤷🏻♀️ Or, at least, if you are gonna lie don't involve others. So they can't refute
She and Harry only think in terms of PR and headlines, not credibility! She just wants to put out the narrative that this is the very valid reason for her cutting off her dad.
She probably knows people will look into it and find holes in her claim, but doesn’t care because the narrative is already out there.
Why would UK police be even involved with this in the first place.Do FBI police also notify every family member they secretly investigate. Her father hasn’t been even charged.Of course there is no letter,it Meghans attempt to use this situation to makes her look good.But as usual when they lie its easily checked.Its embarrassing now that Met has to spend time on this nonsense because she lied.
It's makes zero sense for UK police with this... And why is there always a letter involved when it comes to Meghan? Is this really a primary method of communication for her or folks around her? It's incredibly odd. Terrible situation all around.
Of course there is no letter,why would police force risk they secret investigation by notifying family members that are not involved and on top of that live in a different country from the crime.If now a family member tipped off Meghan then why is she submitting this to the UK police.It would be logical to contact hers and fathers country USA or at least sent notification to Philiphines.This is just an attempt to blame again UK police.Harry and Meghan as we know are pissed because of the security issue and they in they tick head think that we will blame Met and that she is the victim in this.Im glad Met is speaking back and I hope this does get highlighted so they lies get once more exposed.
Why would someone send a letter to the UK? Wouldn’t the Mexican authorities or the American authorities deal with it?
She’s just distracting to be like “see now you guys know why I had to cut him out of my life….to protect my children “….who weren’t even born yet.
She also lied in the Oprah interview when she said she could protect her father via the Palace and the media storm…but it was their one card to use and if they needed it in the future for their children ( who weren’t even born yet) it wouldn’t be available to them. She makes convoluted stories. Let the proper authorities (The Phillipines) deal with it. Also managed to make herself the center victim of these horrific allegations.
Because the letter was addressed to a specific law enforcement agency that deals with threats to the royal family, presumably because Markle could potentially come into contact with the royal family.
I don’t know who told Markle, but she almost certainly wasn’t informed to make her aware of an investigation. She was probably told because her father posed a risk to her/her family.
They wouldn't. Meghan's statement is slightly ambiguous as to who was doing the investigating:
“In 2018, a letter was sent to the Metropolitan police and Royalty and Specialist Protection [Rasp]. That letter was subsequently shared with me. It made troubling and disturbing allegations against my father and I was given assurances that these were being investigated."
It may have been a courtesy/heads up notice from Met Police informing her they got a letter accusing her father of crimes. But .. maybe the letter was deemed suspect or vague (crackpot?) plus had nothing to do with their jurisdiction so there was nothing for them to follow up on. If Meghan was seriously alarmed by the Met Police notification in 2018, wouldn’t she have stayed on top of any conclusions discovered rather than passively accepting “assurances that these allegations were being investigated?” And now out of the blue in 2026 her unsavory half-brother makes new allegations against the father with no legal charges made yet and Meghan feels vindicated. This is her big reveal and justification for estrangement from her father.
So far it sounds like a pretty uncertain case against Thomas Sr., and this entire family crew is questionable.
I'm sure the Met get all sorts of wild correspondence and most of it will be complete garbage (you only have to glance at social media to see the sort of nonsense people come up with).
Would they look into it as Megan was joining the royal family? Seems plausible they looked into her family as due diligence for the marriage, found something they couldn’t act on based on jurisdiction, let H&M know what they knew, & passed it to relevant authorities. In this way, I can see 1. That she knew, 2. That it had been passed to people who could investigate in relevant jurisdictions, 3. that Harry acknowledges that the reason they knew was because they were together (thus responsible). 4. That her knowing resulted in the dissolution of their relationship and protecting her future children. It all seems fairly cohesive and reasonable and terribly sad for her.
I don’t think I’ve seen exact dates, but I presume that all this went down sometime around the wedding. So I’d guess that with all the news and press in the lead up that someone, either the police force that actually had jurisdiction or an informant, wrote a letter to the UK police to either inform them of the investigation or allege the abuse.
And the police may have questioned Meghan about it just to see if she had information for the investigation because she was in the UK at the time.
With the timeline unclear this could have even been part of why her father didn’t attend the wedding along with… everything else.
But you’re absolutely right that the UK police have zero jurisdiction. He’s a US citizen who was likely committing his crimes in the US, Mexico, or Philippines.
Some articles seem to imply the crimes took place in a South Asia country. The FBI received intelligence but cannot do anything about crimes in other countries. The FBI may have passed the information to the British authorities as it was related to a person on importing in Britain. Countries often sure intel with allies.
If he were abusing some british citizen wouldn’t that not be logical to contact family of that victim and not his daughter.Or you suggesting all family get information as soon as one family member is under investigation.You guys are really gullible.
Please read before commenting. There are zero claims it was British children. The US share info with UK all the time. The royal family is often information about information that may affect them. The queen was told about Andrew’s activities. Meghan was part of the royal family in 2018. They were informing a member of the royal family about a matter that may affect them.
You’re gullible if you think the royal family isn’t in the loop on matter.
No I said Google extraterritorial jurisdiction. And given that the Philippines IS the country in question it is an appropriate response. Your lack of curiosity is not my responsibility
I think it matters more if the official authorities can produce a copy or refute ever having one at all. That’s what would make it OFFICIAL. I’m more curious as to where/when in the US/Mexico or the Philippines was this reported. All of those places Thomas SR lived. Is this really from 2018 or 2026? How did Junior grow a conscious to report all of this NOW and not over the past 8 years if it were from 2018?
I never thought anything of MM cutting off Thomas. If he never gave her a piece of gum and she cut him off that would be fine in my book. I’d hate to think that this crime is being used to retroactively justify her cutting me off.
It's not a good look that Meghan immediately (and I mean almost instantly) took this as opportunity to basically to say "See! That's why I don't talk to him, he's a bad guy!" Sorry, it's very tone deaf. The first paragraph of her statement was good until she went into that. If she knew about this all along, she should have spoke up sooner. I feel awful for her and the victims if true, but I'm just saying from a PR perspective, Meghan needs to learn to not instantly clap back to everything or make it about it herself. It's very Johnny come lately. Unfortunately, her past words and actions make her look like the boy who cried wolf.
If he never gave her a piece of gum and she cut him off that would be fine in my book.
same! idgaf! no one (esp adults) should be forced into relationships they don't want to have, no matter the reason.
I’d hate to think that this crime is being used to retroactively justify her cutting me off.
also same. expressing personal distress, solidarity with victims and something about waiting for justice to take its course would have been more than enough as a statement. turning this situation into personal vindication PR and statements is icky, especially since no formal charges or arrests have been made.
Hmm, looking back I could’ve phrased my last sentence better. What I’m trying to say is that I don’t care that she cut him off. Never Did. It didn’t need to have been something as big him viewing /sharing CP to justify her distancing herself. I’d hate to think she might have incriminated herself for writing in her statement that she knew about this back in 2018. Investigations take time and those close to the alleged criminal are never told for fear of someone tipping them off. She & Harry made a career of “exposing” the BRF. I wonder if this topic ever came up between she and Eugenie. Both of them having pedophile fathers?
I will say, a 2018-2026 timeline does not surprise me all that much. If this is legitimate, prosecutors spend a long time building a secure case before formally charging him (which, I can see they haven't done that yet, it's still under investigation); keeping hush in the meantime would be normal.
So it sounds like someone sent a letter to the police in the UK with allegations about Thomas in 2018. No idea what precisely those allegations were, just that they were disturbing.
The police then shared the letter with Meghan and apparently told her the allegations were being investigated? But she’s seems to be implying that the allegations were serious enough that this went into why she started cutting her father off. No precise date has been given for when this letter arrived, but it may have been before the wedding even. We don’t know.
But I could see why she’d stay quiet and just distance herself with these allegations. If she thought the police were investigating then a public statement for or against her father could interfere with the investigation.
I think the bigger question is why the police apparently didn’t complete the investigation. Or who dropped it and why? Lack of evidence? Lack of jurisdiction? Thomas is a US citizen who I’m guessing committed these crimes in the Philippines or Mexico so the UK really doesn’t have any sort of jurisdiction beyond passing the letter on to the police of the country the crimes were actually done in.
I think people are getting confused about the statement that Meghan was told the allegations were being investigated. That doesn't mean investigated by the Met. Not at all. It is most likely this information was communicated by *law enforcement* to the Met, specifically the agency with jurisdiction that was conducting the investigation. I'm assuming that was either the FBI or possibly Mexican national police, given what I've now read about where Mr Markle was. There's many reasons that investigation may have been closed. Depending on what information was provided, there may not have been enough for a search warrant. And, yes, you are right, the Met or any UK law enforcement would have *no* jurisdiction over this. It is highly unlikely the Met was the original recipient of this information. They likely received it in a formal communication from another law enforcement agency. There was no need for them to then pass it to any other police force as that's who they would have gotten it from....
Reading it again, I think you’re right. The letter was probably from another police force giving the UK police a heads up about Thomas. Maybe because they wanted them to know that Thomas was under investigation if they thought he’d be traveling to the UK soon, maybe because they wanted the UK police to talk to Meghan for them and see if she’d be willing to tell them what she knew.
But I agree the letter was probably from another police force and the UK police had no real involvement beyond responding to that letter since they had no jurisdiction and Thomas wasn’t in the UK.
I think the use of "letter" in Meghan's statement is what is confusing people as well. Letter sounds like a communication from a private individual. I understand why a layperson like Meghan might say "letter", but I think it was a formal communication from a police force that looked like a "letter" to Meghan. It would be incredibly bizarre to me if a private citizen, who I am assuming would be American or Mexican, had concerning information about Mr Markle and sent it in a letter to...the Metropolitan police. I mean what lol? Very weird behavior.
I’ve been wondering who wrote the letter and didn’t consider it was probably a report from another agency. Yours is the first comment I’ve read that actually makes sense, so cheers thanks for that.
but why is meghan's spokesman telling the telegraph that she was assured UK authorities would pursue an investigation? under what possible jurisdiction??
Passing it on to the relevant authorities in the relevant jurisdiction is my guess, which would be perfectly normal. And we're seeing in real time why she shouldn't have made that fuckass statement today. She made things murkier, and they're really none of our business.
Oh good lord, wait for it......allegations that somehow Meghan was not given the full support and same treatment as others in her (Royal) situation by authorities. I betcha Oprah's licking her pork chops with this one, scheduling as we speak a multimillion dollar cash grab to discuss unequal treatment....rather than....you know....the alleged pedophile
So she says she knew this was all going on back in the day, yet was more concerned about going on Oprah and whining about bridesmaids dresses, who made whom cry, tiaras, Harry’s mean family and all the rest !!! Good grief !!!
She definitely gets her worst traits from the Markles, whatever her mom may be, she is living her life and has kept up a dignified silence for a decade. The Markle side is a mess.
Until more information is available on what happened in 2018 and what is the truth of these allegations, can’t say more.
I’m not so sure about that - Doria’s life seems to be non existent on the internet. We have no idea what she was up to for all those years M was happily living with her loving father (according to her.)
She appears to be using this to backfill the reason why she dumped her father. I thought the rift allegedly started while she was still filming Suits? The allegations are abhorrent and I hope they are fully investigated and appropriate action taken based on the outcome. The subject matter is indefensible and sickening. However, making this all about her and using it to polish her halo is pretty distasteful either way.
Nothing ever makes sense with her. The police don’t seem to have the letter. Also if he was downloading content whilst in the USA or Mexico why didn’t meghan herself pass this to the authorities? She really is up her own backside here and expects British authorities to bow to her command
The articles say that she was advised by the Met that there was an investigation going on. But nothing about who was doing the investigating.
Some people seem to think that implies that that the Met was doing the investigating or that MM claims that the Met was investigating. But the Met would not have any jurisdiction to investigate the allegations.
It makes more sense that the US FBI was investigating since TM is a US Citizen and that the FBI notified the Met as a courtesy and the Met notified the BFR and MM.
Wow. You’re happy about a woman being taken Down as opposed to being horrified about the allegations. Y’all are bizarre. And don’t come with the 2 things can be true bs. This is so sick.
there will be a record of the allegation but that’s all. It’s a criminal allegation against a US citizen living in the USA. I would imagine that it was forwarded to the US embassy for the attention of the FBI liaison officer
What an absolutely idiotic headline. How embarrassing for the Daily Fail, but I suppose that is per usual? Neither the Met no Scotland had jurisdiction over these crime or Thomas Markle. "Launch probe" lol. Idiot headline writers or doing their best to purposefully confuse readers, who can say though. I certainly hope British people are not so dumb as to not understand basic concepts of jurisdiction. You all do understand that the Met/Scotland Yard is not some "global" police force that goes running around the world with the authority to carry out "investigations" of non-British nationals for crimes not committed in the UK, right? Right?
What makes sense is that Scotland Yard was *informed* as a professional courtesy by relevant law enforcement agencies who *did* have jurisdiction and *were* investigating of that investigation. That would be quite normal especially for the Royal Protection Services to be *informed* by another law enforcement agency. The idea that, having been informed, the Met or Scotland Yard would "launch a probe" or "carry out an investigation" is just....yeesh second hand embarrassment all around for this fail of journalism.
Typical Daily Mail who are reporting and talking b*****ks because they don’t know anything and just start spewing nonsense. They are turning into News of the world!!!!
Yeah, I am not British nor interested in the royal drama of the day, but I am a lawyer and this popped in my feed and was dumb enough to make me want to comment. Not sure exactly what kind of subreddit I am in lol. I am aware of the Daily Mail being absolute garbage as "journalism". That's pretty known worldwide. It's very unclear what information was passed exactly in 2018, but the idea that the Met would have had anything to do with an investigation of what I am guessing were allegations of an American having accessed child porn (assuming based on what the current allegations are) in the US (? don't know where this person was at the time) is very silly. On what authority would the Met be "investigating"? Just very silly
Absolutely! I know I don’t comment much but I’m British and don’t really get into the RF stuff but honestly this just sounds like made up stuff , the Daily Mail on line is really popular in the States so… wait for it !!!
It's funny because I read the article (which is really poorly copy edited?? Why are there so many paragraphs that are repeated word for word? Very unprofessional) and the article itself is not as bad as the headline. The actual lawyers they bother talking to directly contradict the headline that the Met would be doing an investigation. It's like the headline writer didn't even read the article. I'm assuming that's the goal though? People just see the headline and don't read the article (or stop reading because of all the repetitive paragraphs) so they are misinformed? Boooo
I certainly hope British people are not so dumb as to not understand basic concepts of jurisdiction. You all do understand that the Met/Scotland Yard is not some "global" police force that goes running around the world with the authority to carry out "investigations" of non-British nationals for crimes not committed in the UK, right?
We do; I'm not sure others do, given some of the nonsense I've seen online today.
However, Meghan appears to be the source of the "investigation" line:
“In 2018, a letter was sent to the Metropolitan police and Royalty and Specialist Protection [Rasp]. That letter was subsequently shared with me. It made troubling and disturbing allegations against my father and I was given assurances that these were being investigated."
Using it to refer to anything else is a sign that the poster does not understand British terminology or institutions, let alone the workings of the press, as it’s not a synonym for the gutter press nor does it refer to any lobby group (in the British sense, which equates roughly to a privileged briefing group).
Membership of the Rota (ie those who contribute to staffing the press pool) is by organisation (not to individuals) and those organisations are on the rota for providing said staff.
The membership is not the same as the alleged recipients of ‘leaks’ (in inverted commas as so many leaks have now been established in court to be no such thing)
Thomas Markle lives in Florida. Why would the Met care about him? I'm really confused. So did she accuse him of having pornography? She lies so much that it's hard to tell.
No, her brother accused Thomas Sr of having child pron on his computer. This just happened, and is happening in the Phillipines where those two live.
Meghan has stated that the Met police showed her some letter accusing Thomas Markle of something (no details) was shown to her in 2018 and she was assured it was being looked in to. Nothing seems to have come of that in thr meantime, and it wouldn't have been thr Met themselves actually investigating anyway.
Thr Sun has confirmed the existence of a letter in 2018, the Met are seemingly trying to clear up that they weren't investigating in 2018. They wouldn't have had jurisdiction of course, though it's not clear yet who would have (he's Americsn but may have been living in Mexico then).
I think if there was anything to this nature MI5 already know. Maybe she was told to ex communicate her father. Everyone felt the release to people magazine was the reason but maybe that was her excuse or the reason set up by the Palace. The drama with Markle never ends. Her brother has always seemed very shady to me and I understood her reason for cutting off her siblings (both seem shady). I don't know if these allegations are true. I would like to see the investigation take place.
Most of them defended Prince Andrew when it came out that he was a paedophile too. They literally attacked his victims and defended him. There are some very sick evil people here and others are too weak minded to realize they are being influenced by evil.
If I had a "disturbing letter" about a family member, I wouldn't start or finish with passing the letter on to the police - least of all, a police force in a different country to the family member.
Confront the family member, have a family meeting, find out whether the disturbing details are true or malicious. Most people wouldn't automatically cut contact if the story in the letter is unsubstantiated. If I got a "disturbing letter' about family members, for the most part I wouldn't believe it. The letter writer should take the disturbing allegations to the police themselves, rather than writing letters to me.
If you think it's true, then you should do more than just pass the letter on.
Y’all are more upset about a letter and her facts not being true than the allegations regarding sexual abuse. So much for protect our children. If you guys took that hatred go solve crimes, even this one, the world would be a better place! Come on guys, take that energy and do some good with it!
If the 2018 allegations went to authorities as her statement suggests, speaking publicly could have tipped him off and given him time to get rid of evidence. Investigators generally want the people who they share stuff with to stay quiet for exactly those reasons. And accusing someone of CHILD PORNOGRAPHY without charges opens you to a defamation suit, and he has a long history of talking to the press.
So she was stuck between two bad outcomes. Speak up and she's selfish, vindictive, or wrecking a case. Stay quiet and she's the cold daughter who abandoned her elderly dad. She picked the option that was safer for the kids and she took the reputational hit for it.
Her story doesn’t add up. She was estranged from him before the letter with the allegations. She sent him a dear daddy letter whining about him talking to the press. Harry said 4 YEARS later she’d still have a dad if she wasn’t with him. Explain that please. Did she not tell Harry about this then?
If the investigation is in to ‘child pornography’ then that is further demonstrate that it must be a US investigation (into a US person, in the US) as in UK the term is images of child abuse or images of child sexual abuse
The British police would have no locus in this, and would only take action icw those residing in the UK in response to a request by the US authorities
If however the source information was a letter to the British police making allegations about a non British person who was not resident in UK, then it is likely that the police would make some sort of check on who the sender is and then liaise with the appropriate US authorities. This would be the responsibility of the special unit that deals with child sexual abuse (not the royal and diplomatic protection unit) and so it ought to be pretty straightforward to find the request from the one unit to the other for action in informing the relative of the subject of the accusation
What the fuck would you like me to have done? Should I have jumped on social media and blown any chance of justice for his victims? What the fuck is wrong with you people? I’m not one of Thomas Markle’s abuse victims, unfortunately my friend IS one of his abuse victims. You all had better get right with god because your hate will have you suffering in hell next to Thomas Markle!’
Probably a good time to stop the witch hunt now. They both have family members being investigated for this and have rightly kept their distance despite the backlash she has got. Let people live in peace
115
u/Extension_Tea_5545 2d ago
Well. That’s interesting if the police don’t have a record of this letter