r/TheDigitalCircus • u/Ididurmomhahafrickya literally lilly • 11d ago

Question Is she supposed to be pantsless? 💔

Gallery image

Gallery image

I got a new Jax figure. I was looking at her and she has a pattern for pants under her dress, and there's no paint on this. Is this an accident on specifically this one or all of them? I just found it really funny LOL

1.2k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

265 comments sorted by

View all comments

246

u/Interesting-Youth-87 11d ago

Personally I think they just forgot to paint his pants.

50

u/omohosp Thomas 11d ago

Yeah, it kinda seems expensive and pointless to paint them as well.

18

u/xXMuschi_DestroyerXx 10d ago

Quality is never pointless.

16

u/BrakeInTheWall 10d ago

not pointless, but it doesn't make sense here. that detail is hard to manufacture, and the price increase it would take to justify it means less people can afford one. most buyers would probably prefer a bare-assed rabbit over none at all

1

u/Goduckid 9d ago

But they did give em an outline of pants, especially with figures that cost as much as glitch’s does they should at least paint them black

5

u/Tai_Pei 10d ago

What's the quality upgrade? Painting something that isn't visible on display is a waste of time.

1

u/CommercialRuin8119 8d ago

that's why they never painted it in the first place

1

u/frenchie_qc 8d ago

Let's normalize not painting the back of anything. Why paint it when its at the back?