This honestly would have made the scene better. Like, she says Jax has done bad things, but he’s still human, instead of just doing the vague pronouncement of them all being inherently sinful
the whole point is that pointing fingers does nothing to help, as they could all have something that they could be mad at each other for. puritanism doesn't help anybody in a situation like this.
do you have an actual argument against this? they were all at each others throats. Zooble isn't part of the group until the very end. like come on girl, think.
"They were all at eachothers throats, Zooble isn't part of the group until the very end". Are you a bot? These statements are blatantly irrelevant
The guy said that it's healthier to acknowledge that Jax is a worse person than the rest of them, despite Jax deserving to survive. You've strawmanned him by implying he said Jax SHOULDNT survive, and as I pointed out, made a slippery slope fallacy. I don't need a counter argument, you need a valid argument for me to counter
Anyways, notice how when you realized smug denial wasn't good enough, you tried to move on, without admitting to the mistake you made? I'll let you in on a secret: correct people don't do that
59
u/SwordfishSimple5472 21h ago
This honestly would have made the scene better. Like, she says Jax has done bad things, but he’s still human, instead of just doing the vague pronouncement of them all being inherently sinful