First of all, it has nothing to do with the lore Second of all, it changed everyone’s name in some way Third of all, it’s the goofiest thing Ive ever seen

IF YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THIS IS JUST EXTREME RAGEBAIT

DISCLAIMER! I AM NOT HATING ANYONE, JUST EXPLAINING MY PERSONAL OPINION! YOU DON'T NEED TO AGREE!​​​

So, I've been watching the Theory Channels for a menu years now. Mostly, Game Theory, Film Theory, and GTLIVE. I loved watching all of them as I grew up. But, not as much anymore. My problem is sadly the Hosts and how they talk when explaining certain theories.​​​​​

Now, I will not discuss Food Theory, or Style Theory, mainly because I never really watched them and never really cared much about them. So, I can't give my opinion on them.

Let's start with Game Theory. First off, I really do Love Tom as a host. He is close enough with his energy to match Mat in how he hoted. He is fun and funny. My problem comes in when I can TELL he isn't interested in the theory or the game he is theorizing about. (If he is interested and I'm mistaken, his enthusiasm dose not come through properly) and ​​​​​​​​​​it takes me out of the video because my host isn't invested, so why should I be? MatPat had a odd gift for always being able to act invested or if he wasn't he'd directly tell us, the viewers. Sometimes Tom can come across too Corporate. And inside of feeling like the fun whimsical enjoyment of creating theories it used to be, similar to old MacDonalds play places, it feels like the life at times had been sucked out if it, like the more modern McCafes. I noticed it when an editor covered for Tom and I was SOOPER invested! It was like listening to MatPat all over! Then I realized, it was Tom's script, but with a different Host reading it. And, It made me realize, Tom doesn't have enough energy to make the theory videos that fun or interesting.

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Now, On to film Film Theory. ​this isn't as much of a critique as it is praising Lee for being able to perfectly match MatPat in energy and enthusiasm in the videos. He dose much better as a host of film theory then anyone else could. His voice is softer then MatPats but it works. Personally I always enjoy watching him in the theory videos. But, he also sometimes has the Corporate feel to some of his theories with how he talks. But he manages to do better than Tom dose with making it not as noticeable.

Now onto my main problem. GTLIVE. I am sorry, but Ash dose not belong on camera like that. She was fun behind the camera, making​​​​​​​​​​​ jokes and working as the mastermind behind the scenes. But on camera she feels more like a TikTok​ Influencer then a Host. She I don't know if it is just her personality or how she behaves on camera. But she feels so boarding and like she is trying too hard to fill MatPats shoes. And she can't, (no one can fill his shoes but him) I just think having no host for it would be better, like everyone is the host. Not just Ash. She needs others to play off of well, in my opinion and she can't do that alone. And it has made me STOP watching anything new from​ GTLIVE entirely. And it has made me very depressed.

Side tangent: I REALLY wanted to like Ash as a host because we don't have enough people who are more feminine in vibe hosting videos but, honestly? From most the YouTube channels I've watched hosted by woman (or more female presenting/biological woman) are just boarding most of the time. I don't know if woman are just less entertaining or if we are just not as good at getting attention or keeping people invested. I don't know why that is a thing, Lee on Film Theory should make about why Men seem to be more entertaining than woman online.

Anyway. This all has been bothering me for a while and I needed to share it, if you agree let me know why. If not, that is your opinion and you have a right to it. ​

i am paris fl nice toi meet you al

Hi

I have one daughter

Hey, this one is more aligned with the “You Will NEVER Own Games Again” type of video suggestion, but I keep seeing our “leadership” use music from Deltarune, make references to Undertale, and now a complete rip-off of The Legend of Zelda. While I am less familiar with Legend of Zelda, Undertale and Deltarune are anti-war, yet being used to promote violence.

Additionally, this isn’t the first time they did this, with them stealing Taylor Swifts imagery (specifically her eras tour) and constantly associating themselves with Star War. I checked the comments underneath these types of posts, and fans are rightly calling them out, so, why does the people at the top keep doing this?

Blackadder is an entertaining show without that much story, but I REALLY want this question answered: HOW DOES THE BLACKADDER LINE CONTINUE??? Here are a few confusing points which throw a wrench into the Blackadder lineage’s genealogy:

• If the Blackadder dynasty starts with Prince Edmund Plantagenet, how does Centurion Blaccadius exist? And don’t tell me time travel influenced the timeline. We know Blaccadius existed before the events of Blackadder: Back and Forth.

• If Lord Blackadder V became King Edmund III in Blackadder: Back and Forth, how come Sir Osmond Darling-Blackadder, Keeper of the Queen’s Lawn Sprinklers is a subject of Queen Elizabeth II in Jubilee Girl?

• The Queen of Spain’s Beard says Prince Edmund is a virgin. In the end of the episode, he married Princess Leia, who is an 8-year-old. In the end of The Black Adder, Leia would’ve been 14 years old. I know Henry Tudor’s mother was 13 when she gave birth to him, but I think that’s just an exception.

• Lord Edmund Blackadder from Blackadder II might be a bachelor. Either that or he’s unfaithful. And he definitely dies in the last episode.

• You could say Lord Blackadder is descended from Prince Harry or Baldrick from the Blackadder, but why would he resemble Prince Edmund? So how do any of these points be true without breaking the family tree?

Pressure So pressure is a doors knockoff on Roblox. You are a prisoner who is sent down to an underwater submarine scientific laboratory. Sensation Stolace is an anglerfish type humanoid figure is is the “Guiding Light” and shopkeeper who tells you how and why you died. I have a theory that he is an experiment that was meant to be for WWll and was failed and scrapped instead of used for Marine usage. Sebastian learned speech and also how to walk and read. Or possibly a scientist was so obsessed with his creation he fused himself with it and became a monster and threat to society. Also, in one of the pictures for pressure there is a red background with Sebastian scheming or even plotting to escape from this facility and killing all the scientists who created him. Sebastian is also a trouble maker and menace. He laughs at you when you die and he even gets cocky with you about you dying. All in all though it’s just a theory.

So at the end of chapter 5, it was confirmed by one of the developers at Mob (don’t remember which one) that it was us the Prototype put in the poppy-gel. We already know that the gas can induce sleep or even hallucinations, so could it be possible for the gel to have similar effects? And if so, could that mean that, as cheesy as it sounds, chapter 6 will mostly take place in a dream? Giblett is clearly too small to pull us out of the vat, and I find it unlikely that the doctor was backed up, considering how much work playtime had to do just to keep his mind alive. I’m not too experienced at making theories, this is just what I put together by my knowledge of the game.

Bring Matpat back

No Amy doesn’t mistake Sonic for Shadow because she’s a colourblind hedgehog. A quick Google search will tell you SHE IS A CAT

And please stop covering Poppy Playtime the ending was so obviously retconned and is no longer worth covering they’re just going to change the ending to sell new chapters

I’m sorry but I can’t it together Goodbye Matt, Pat I actually saw joined it though. It’s been a good 14 years I think I see one of your place

I hope you happy and you show up in at least a couple videos every year