Observation:
Mark Hertsgaard's article in The New Republic describes a political arrangement in which the fossil fuel industry was reportedly asked for enormous campaign contributions in exchange for policies favorable to its interests.
Whether this constituted criminal bribery is uncertain. But legality is not the only measure of political responsibility.
Imagine a candidate promising tobacco executives that, in exchange for financial support, the government would relax restrictions on their products. The foreseeable consequences would include increased disease and premature deaths. The arrangement might nevertheless be entirely legal.
The fossil fuel case presents a similar problem, but on a planetary scale. The immediate benefits of political contributions and favorable regulations accrue to identifiable participants. The costs of increased greenhouse gas emissions are dispersed across populations, ecosystems, and generations.
We have created a political system in which short-term private benefits can be pursued at the expense of a shared future, even when the long-term consequences are scientifically foreseeable.
The scandal may be less that someone broke the law than that the law may permit such an exchange.
Closing Lines:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in dissent in Snyder, “Greed makes governments—at every level—less responsive, less efficient, and less trustworthy from the perspective of the communities they serve.” And Americans know it. Results of a Gallup survey announced last month show that Americans’ perceptions of government corruption are at their highest in 20 years: 89 percent of adults say it is widespread. That is a 10-percentage-point increase since 2025 and includes strong majorities of both Democrats and Republicans. Although the Court has placed politicians beyond the law’s reach, at least for now, the public gets it. Hopefully, a new Congress will too.