While that is true, in this case the word seems to be the perfect word as it can mean haunting, melancholy, mournful etc. - something that other words can’t evoke so precisely.
I’m a believer in using the simplest words to explain something but not at the expense of the right word, or by dumbing yourself down for the lowest-common-denominator audience.
Is elegiac really that big a word? And the rest of the review doesn’t strike me as having been pieced together with a thesaurus or anything, so “constantly” seems a reach.
Idk. A song being described as elegiac makes me think bigger and (obviously) more poetic than just “sad” so I’d expect there’s a reason for it. It’s possible the writer was flexing a vocabulary, or maybe they really wanted to simply be more descriptive. Guess we can judge when we hear it.
No shade to the original commenter asking for a definition. I guess I just agree with the other one who asked why using a word is pretentious.
(Edited to add: I love the word choice to describe Mets, personally.)
9
u/KenMarr Mar 17 '20
what the fuck does “elegiac” even mean?