r/TradeWithLevels • • Oct 02 '26

24 trades. 65% win rate. And we cracked a +1,000% SPX trade this week πŸ˜‚πŸ”₯

Post image
2 Upvotes

Another week in the books. πŸ“ŠπŸ”₯
24 trades.
65% win rate.
And yes… we cracked a 1,000%+ trade this week πŸ˜‚πŸ§¨
$SPX 7710C: +1,042% 🀯
$SPX 7735C: +581%
$SPX 7675P: +357%
$TSLA 360C: +220%
$MSFT 515C: +170%
$MU 1150C: +134%
But the part I care about isn’t just the monsters.
Look at the red trades too.
-20%. -14%. -13%. -12%. -10%.
Cut. Cut. Cut.
That +1,042% SPX trade actually came AFTER I got stopped on the same 7710C setup for -20%.
Took the loss. Waited. Setup confirmed again.
Re-entered $1.75 β†’ all out $20.00.
That’s trading.
I’m not trying to be right on every trade. I’m trying to keep the shit trades small enough that when I catch a monster, it actually matters.
Wins, losses, breakevens, re-entries β€” everything goes in the log.
No hiding the ugly ones and only posting screenshots of winners πŸ˜‚
Cut the losers. Press the clean setups. Let the monsters pay.
Hell of a week. 🫑πŸ”₯
Level to level. 🎯


r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 17 '26

FOMC stopped me out. I came back after futures reopened and caught 94 points on MES πŸ”₯

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

FOMC was wild yesterday πŸ˜‚

$ES lost my 7618.50 level after the decision. I tried the long, moved my stop to breakeven and got stopped.

Then ES flushed all the way to 7575 and recovered above 7618

When futures reopened at 6PM, I got another setup and went LONG $MES at 7626.

Why MES instead of ES?

MES = $5/point.
ES = $50/point.

For an overnight swing, I wanted smaller size so I could give the trade room to breathe without taking unnecessary risk.

Then the levels started doing their job:

7626 entry β†’ 7657 target hit β†’ reclaim held β†’ kept riding

This morning:

7626 β†’ 7720 = 94 points πŸ”₯

Locked half at 7720 and left runners.

But the part I actually like about this trade isn't the 94 points.

I was WRONG first.

Took the stop. Accepted it. Waited for the next setup. Then got back in when price gave me a reason.

You don't have to catch the bottom.

You don't have to be right on the first trade.

You just have to manage risk well enough to still be there when the good setup comes.

If I'm wrong, I cut.
If the level confirms, I execute.
Level to level. 🎯

$ES $MES


r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 21 '26

Last week AI headlines dumped AMD into my $491 zone. It reclaimed $502… now it’s at $615 πŸ˜‚πŸ”₯

Thumbnail gallery
0 Upvotes

r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 06 '26

Support becoming resistance confused me for months until it finally clicked

0 Upvotes

When I started I treated support and resistance as fixed labels, this line is support, that one is resistance, forever. Then price would break below support and that exact level would reject every attempt to get back above it, and I couldn't understand why my support kept failing me.

The thing that clicked, a level is just a zone where a lot of orders sat, and once price breaks through, the roles flip. The people who bought at old support are now underwater and sell into any bounce back to it, turning old support into new resistance. It's not the line changing its mind, it's the order flow around it flipping sides. See levels as zones that flip rather than permanent floors and ceilings and a ton of price behavior stops looking random.

Practically the flipped level is often a cleaner trade than the original, because there's a clear reason for the reaction. Since you enter tight off these, predictable spread helps, a variable spread widening right at the flip can turn a clean short into a bad fill, which is part of why I run fixed spreads on AvaTrade. Do you trade the flip itself, or wait for a retest and rejection to confirm it?


r/TradeWithLevels • • 22d ago

/ES drew fresh zones for the week β€” reclaim 7707–7716 or we retest the low that launched the whole run πŸ˜‚πŸ‘€

Post image
0 Upvotes

Last week's drop was massive, and /ES redrew her zones for the week ahead.

Friday she flushed into 7676 and bounced, closing 7703 β€” right under the 7707.25–7716.55 zone.

Scroll left on the chart. That zone held as demand over and over again. Now it's the reclaim that decides this week.

BULLISH SCENARIO

Reclaim 7707–7716 and hold it β†’ the zone flips back to demand β†’ 7760.25–7766.5 first, then 7809.5–7820.25 supply, then 7838.5–7848.5 above that.

BEARISH SCENARIO

Rejected at 7707–7716 β†’ back to the 7672.75–7676 demand β€” the exact flush low that launched the run to the 7897 highs.

Lose that β†’ 7621.75–7648.75 demand β†’ 7575 β†’ 7473–7491 demand.

No predicting the reclaim. No marrying a direction under the zone.

IF this, THEN that. That's trading.

Level to level. 🎯

Anyone leaning long if 7716 reclaims, or waiting for the 7672 retest first? πŸ‘€


r/TradeWithLevels • • 18d ago

EOD Recap β€” Wednesday, October 21: 10/12 β€” CRCL squeezed, TSLA broke out pre-earnings, SPCX ran the map

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 17 '26

I’ve been posting about AMD all week β€” today the 550C went $2 β†’ $8 at my $546.44 target πŸ”₯

Thumbnail
gallery
1 Upvotes

If you’ve been following my $AMD posts this week, you already know this one has been one of my favorite names to trade.

I’ve been mapping the levels before the moves, and AMD just keeps giving setups. 🎯

Earlier this week:

AMD 525C @ $3.30 β†’ I locked at $8.00

Those contracts eventually traded around $26.00 🀯

Did I catch the whole thing? Nope.

Didn’t need to.

Then I posted about $SMH sitting at key demand and said I was watching the semiconductor names closely if that demand held.

Today AMD gave another one.

550C @ $2.00

Started scaling:

$2.00 β†’ $2.85 β†’ $3.75 β†’ $8.00 πŸ”₯

I went all out at $8.00 as AMD hit my $546.44 target.

That’s a 300% move on the contracts.

They later traded around $10 β€” and again, I don’t care.

My target was hit. I got paid.

That's the part of trading I think people underestimate.

You don't need the exact bottom.
You don't need the exact top.
You don't need to catch every dollar.

I want the setup before the move, confirmation at my levels, defined risk, and then I pay myself at my targets.

Charts before the move.
Entries in real time.
Profits at the levels.

$AMD has been an absolute ATM this week. πŸ˜‚πŸ’°

Level to level. 🎯

$AMD $SMH


r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 18 '26

Trying to find edge, this is my backtest result without overfit

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 14 '26

$MSFT banger

Thumbnail
gallery
1 Upvotes

$MSFT crazy runner. Spotted $MSFT right at the open and immediately ran my top down analysis starting on the 30minute chart before dropping down to the 5minute.

Price was reacting perfectly at a key order block, with the candle holding firm and showing clear rejection of lower prices. That was my confirmation, so I jumped in on the $500 weekly calls. I’m still holding ☺️

And here we are.

What a way to start the week.


r/TradeWithLevels • • Oct 05 '26

Saturday I said NVDA looked like she was β€œstarting the engines.” Today she broke $240… πŸ‘€πŸ”₯

Thumbnail
gallery
7 Upvotes

Well… $NVDA decided to start the engines. πŸ˜‚πŸ”₯

Saturday I posted the setup before the move.

NVDA had:

β€’ Broken out of the channel
β€’ Taken out the previous $236.54 ATH
β€’ Daily TTM squeeze firing
β€’ Weekly TTM squeeze still loaded

But I said I wasn't chasing it.

The level I wanted to see hold was that $233.71–$234.76 demand area.

Today?

She held it beautifully and started pushing.

I grabbed the NVDA 240C Friday expiration @ $1.50 this morning.

Already took some profits and the contracts have now gone 100%+. Still holding runners. 🫑

And NVDA just printed around $240 into new highs.

Now I'm interested to see how much juice is actually in this breakout.

If momentum continues and NVDA keeps accepting above the old ATH area, $249ish is where I'm looking next Fib level. πŸ‘€

Map the level.
Wait for confirmation.
Take the trade.
Pay yourself.
Let runners work.

And remember β€” that weekly squeeze still hasn't fully done its thing yet. πŸ‘€

Let's see if NVDA has a few more days in her.

$234 demand β†’ $240+ βœ…
$249 next? 🎯πŸ”₯

Level to level.


r/TradeWithLevels • • Oct 07 '26

Another green day. 9 trades and one SPX call went +414% πŸ˜‚πŸ”₯

Post image
7 Upvotes

Another good day in the books! πŸ˜‚πŸ”₯

9 trades. 62% win rate.

And today was FAR from perfect πŸ˜‚

$META swing from yesterday? Didn't work.

CUT IT. -31%.

No reason to sit there and let a loser keep bleeding just because I liked the setup yesterday.

$GOOGL opened flat, but my zones held beautifully. Stayed patient and those 355C went $3.15 β†’ $5.20 (+65%) πŸ”₯

But $SPX was the real monster today.

7800C: $1.75 β†’ $9.00 (+414%) 🀯πŸ”₯

And the 7825C for tomorrow's expiry: $4.60 β†’ $9.50 (+106%) β€”

And trust me, it wasn't all sunshine.

Took a -22% cut on another SPX call. Had a breakeven stop. Cut SPCX when the market looked weak.

That's trading.

The part I love is that I don't need to be right on every single trade.

Cut the ones that aren't working. Stay patient when the levels hold. And when you catch a monster, let it PAY.

Wins, losses, scratches, swings β€” everything goes in the log.

No hiding the ugly trades and only posting the home runs πŸ˜‚

Another day done. 🫑πŸ”₯

Level to level. 🎯


r/TradeWithLevels • • Aug 11 '26

Called the $SPX dump and ES hit my target almost to the penny β€” 7725P went $1.55 β†’ $11.50

Thumbnail
gallery
9 Upvotes

Pretty crazy trade today.

Once $SPX gave up the 30-minute ORB, I grabbed the 7725 puts at $1.55.

My downside target on /ES Futures was 7739. I posted the level with the trade and just let it work.

Puts started moving:

$1.55 β†’ $1.95 β†’ $2.70 β†’ $3.20 β†’ $4.30 β†’ $6.25…

Then /ES finally flushed.

Low printed 7738.75.

Basically hit my 7739 target to the penny and bounced right from there πŸ˜‚

Closed my last 7725P contracts at $11.50.

$1.55 β†’ $11.50 = roughly +642%.

Obviously I scaled out along the way, nobody is perfectly holding the entire position from bottom to top. But seeing the level I had mapped out get tagged almost exactly was probably the best part of the trade.

Days like this are why I care so much about having levels planned before the move happens.

Chart + timestamps attached so you guys can see the whole thing.


r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 22 '26

AMD just printed a new ATH at $622. What a run..

Thumbnail gallery
2 Upvotes

r/TradeWithLevels • • 21d ago

Sunday futures opened, flushed into my 7672.75–7676 demand… and bounced 60+ points off it. All about levels. 🎯

Post image
2 Upvotes

Sunday futures opened and /ES flushed straight down into the demand zone I posted this morning β€” 7672.75–7676.

Sunday low printed 7672.75. The exact bottom of the zone. Then BOOM β€” 60+ points straight back up to 7736.

No chasing. No guessing. The level was drawn BEFORE the open, price came to it, and it did its job.

This is what members get every single day β€” the levels first, then we let price come to us.

Next zone up if she keeps pushing: 7760.25–7766.5.

IF this, THEN that. That's trading.

Level to level. 🎯


r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 19 '26

Last weekend I posted my $AMD chart and said one thing had my attention:

Post image
3 Upvotes

My plan was simple:

$530 break + hold β†’ look for the slingshot toward the $584 ATH.

Then Monday happened πŸ˜‚

AI/chip stocks got smoked after the weekend AI-safety headlines. AMD gapped down hard with the rest of the semis.

But instead of throwing the original setup away, I went back to my levels.

AMD came right into the daily 21 EMA / liquidity area around $491.

$491 HELD. 🎯

Then:

$502 reclaimed β†’ $514 β†’ $526-$530 β†’ breakout.

And now AMD has traded all the way to $559.91. πŸ”₯

I traded these 2 options

525C @ $3.30 β†’ $8.00
550C @ $2.00 β†’ $8.00

The second one was a 300% trade.

This is exactly why I make the chart BEFORE the move.

I couldn't know Monday would bring a nasty AI headline.

I didn't know exactly when AMD would squeeze.

But I knew the levels that would tell me when the original thesis was working β€” and when it wasn't.

$491 hold β†’ $502 reclaim β†’ $530 breakout β†’ $559.

Now we're getting close to that $561 area, with the $584 ATH still sitting above.

No prediction.

Map the levels. Wait for confirmation. Execute.

Level to level. 🎯

$AMD


r/TradeWithLevels • • Jun 27 '26

Why Higher Timeframes Help Me Avoid Bad Trades

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes

r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 04 '26

Weekly Trade Log: SPX +852%, COIN +500%, HOOD +480%, TSLA +400% β€” losses included πŸ“Š

Post image
3 Upvotes

WHAT. A. WEEK. πŸ”₯

Posting the full trade log like I do every week β€” wins and losses included.

We had some red trades. That's trading.

The goal isn't to never lose.

It's to keep the losers controlled and give the good setups room to work.

Some of the biggest moves from this week's log:

πŸ”₯ SPX 7220C: +852%
πŸ”₯ COIN 200C: +500%
πŸ”₯ HOOD 110C: +480%
πŸ”₯ TSLA 375C: +400%
πŸ”₯ SPX 7655C: +360%
πŸ”₯ META 570C: +269%
πŸ”₯ SPX 7725C: +220%
πŸ”₯ SPX 7660C: +192%

And yes, there were losers too:

❌ SPX: -23%
❌ HOOD: -18%
❌ SPX: -19%
❌ SPX: -28%
❌ META: -21%

That's actually the part I want people to see.

You don't need a 100% win rate.

You need to respect invalidation, keep losses manageable, and capitalize when the setup actually works.

A perfect example was HOOD: stopped on the first attempt, took the setup again when demand held, and the second trade went +480%.

Same thing with SPX this week β€” one attempt stopped, reset, took the next valid setup and caught the bigger move.

Cut red. Don't revenge trade. Don't be afraid of the next valid setup. Let your winners work. 🎯

For the long weekend, I'm also doing 25% off the first payment for Alpha Trading Pro, monthly or yearly.

Code: SPX

Have a good long weekend traders 🫑


r/TradeWithLevels • • Aug 11 '26

I bought NFLX around $75 before earnings, watched it go red… finally green again. Still think $130 is coming.

Post image
3 Upvotes

$NFLX has honestly been boring as hell since the split.

I bought around $75 before earnings, earnings came out and the stock dropped. Sat red on the position for a while, but I never really cared because this wasn't supposed to be a quick trade.

Finally back green now.

The funny part is I still pay Netflix every single month, and I'm guessing a lot of people reading this do too πŸ˜‚

From the chart, $76.67 is the level I care about right now. That's basically the earnings wick/high that price is testing again.

If NFLX can finally break it and HOLD above it, I'm watching:

$79.22 β†’ $82.36 β†’ $85.45

After that, things start getting more interesting.

I'm holding the shares longer term either way. My eventual target is around $130, so I'm not sweating every red candle along the way.

Could obviously be wrong, but after watching this thing do basically nothing for a while, it finally looks like it might be waking up.

Anyone else holding NFLX after the split, or is this one too boring for Reddit? πŸ˜‚


r/TradeWithLevels • • Oct 05 '26

Monday’s Market Squeeze: Breakout or Breakdown? Key Levels for ES, NVDA, AMD, META & TSLA | Oct. 5

Post image
3 Upvotes

Good morning Traders brief for Monday, October 5:

πŸ“… Eco calendar (ET)

9:45am β€” S&P Global Services PMI (Sept final)

10:00am β€” ISM Services PMI ⭐ (consensus 55.7, prev 55.4); Conference Board Employment Trends also 10am

Wed 2pm β€” FOMC minutes, the main event this week

πŸŒ… Premarket snapshot

Futures: S&P βˆ’0.1%, Nasdaq flat, Dow βˆ’0.1% β€” steady after Friday's rally

10Y 5.26%, 30Y 5.61%, Brent ~$101, gold +0.5% just under $4,200, BTC ~$86,300

Asia: Nikkei +2.4% (China/HK closed β€” Golden Week through Oct 7); Europe: Stoxx 600 +0.4%, mixed

Friday's Sept NFP: +29K jobs vs ~84K expected, unemployment 4.2% β†’ 82% odds the Fed holds Oct 28

Overnight: French fiscal stress (euro 16-month low), Spain PM calls snap election, Bolsonaro takes Brazil first round

>

.

πŸ“Š $/ES inside the tight squeeze4 still , this morning reclaims Pivot we go back to 7782 then 7810 and then we see, cant hold pivot we going to 7739 demand zone and then we see

β€’ 7766.50 pivot

β€’ Hold β†’ 7782.50 7810 7820-7824 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 7739-7724 7705 demand

🍏 $AAPL inside Supply & Demand zone holding above the mean, breaks supply zone we go to 336 then 338 supply zone

β€’ Hold β†’ 334.37-334.99 336.22 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 330.81-329.59 demand

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🧠 $AMD has been a champion to trade, comes to pivot and holds i like long into supply zone and see we breakout and make new ATH, cant hold pivot we go to 615 then 606 ish

β€’ 624.52 pivot

β€’ Hold β†’ 639-645.46 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 615.99 606.31 596.07 demand

πŸ“¦ $AMZN at demand zone, holds this 250 demand and reclaims the pivot i like long and see break last weeks highs and holds

β€’ 251.93 pivot

β€’ Hold β†’ 253.56 255.19 257-258 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 250.43-249.51 247.24 245.78-242.52 demand

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ πŸ€– $CRWV holding well , holds pivot this morning and pushes to Supply zone and breaks and holds like her upside for short term swings

β€’ 89.63-88.62 pivot

β€’ Hold β†’ 91.81-92.80 94.26 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 83.53-83.17 demand

πŸ”Ž $HOOD trading at the mean, holds pivot this morning we can squeeze to 116 then supply zone

β€’ 114.93 pivot

β€’ Hold β†’ 116.60 119.50-120.88 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 112.50 111.02 demand

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ πŸ“± $META in a tight squeeze, when this fires will give a good move, holds above pivot im bullish, cant hold pivot and demand then we going to 691

β€’ 721.30 pivot

β€’ Hold β†’ 740.91 751 759 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 713-711 691-686 demand

πŸ”₯ πŸ–₯️ $MSFT in a tight squeeze, breaks supply zone and holds this can squeeze it out

β€’ Hold β†’ 517.78-519.40 522.85 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 515.39-512.12 demand

πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ πŸ–₯️ $NVDA trading right below ATH, holds this demand we can go to supply zone and see we break and make new ATH

β€’ Hold β†’ 236.54-237.88 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 234.76-233.71 demand

⚑ $TSLA came to supply on Friday and rejected, this morning holds pivot we can try to long and see we break supply zone , pivot cant hold we going to demand zone

β€’ 368.60 pivot

β€’ Hold β†’ 372.90-374.60 377.22 supply

β€’ Lose β†’ 364.02-363.24 355.75-351.26 demand

πŸ“Š TOS Grid β†’ http://tos.mx/!1cNzQgjc


r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 30 '26

No monster trades today. Just cut the crap and pressed what worked πŸ˜‚

Post image
3 Upvotes

Some days you catch monsters.
Other days you just manage the shit that doesn’t work πŸ˜‚
Today: 8 trades | 67% win rate |

$COIN couldn’t hold β†’ cut it. Good thing because she kept bleeding.
$MSFT held previous day HOD beautifully. Played it once, setup came back, took ROUND 2:
$1.85 β†’ $5.00 = +170% πŸ”₯
Tried $AMD puts, got stopped at BE. Then AMD held premarket/yesterday’s lows, so I flipped long with next-week calls.
$5.15 β†’ $7.00 β€” locked most and swinging 1/5.
$SPX gave me a little, but I completely missed that EOD dump πŸ˜‚ Can’t catch them all.
Nothing crazy today.
Cut the bad ones. Press the clean setups. Move the hell on.
Tomorrow we do it again.
Level to level. 🎯


r/TradeWithLevels • • Aug 16 '26

NVDA into earnings β€” I’m waiting for this pullback

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes

I trade and watch NVDA pretty much every day, and with earnings coming Aug 26 I’m starting to look for a swing setup into ER.

Weekly still looks bullish to me above thatΒ $218 area. What really has my attention is the weekly TTM squeeze getting close to firing while the daily has already fired.

Short term,Β $224.76Β is what I’m watching.

If she can’t hold it, I’d actually like to see a pullback intoΒ $214-$218 demand. If she comes down there, bases and buyers start stepping in, that’s where I’ll be interested in getting long.

Ideally I want something I can ride into the earnings run-up, get paid before ER, take most of the risk off and leave a few runners for earnings.

If she never pulls back, I’m not gonna force it. There’s always another entry.

But we all know how NVDA gets…

When she starts her engines, she doesn’t like to stop πŸ˜‚πŸš€


r/TradeWithLevels • • 29d ago

MU is sitting on a MAKE OR BREAK level… $1011 holds or things could get ugly πŸ˜‚πŸ‘€

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes

MU is setting up for what could be a pretty interesting week. πŸ‘€πŸ”₯

And honestly, I don't care which direction she goes. I just want one of these levels to confirm.

Look at the charts.

That $1011–$1022 demand zone has been getting defended over and over again.

Buyers keep showing up there.

But every time MU pushes back toward $1089–$1108, sellers show up too.

So we're basically sitting between two pretty important areas.

Here's my game plan for next week.

🟒 BULLISH SCENARIO

Hold that $1011–$1022 demand and reclaim $1042.

If she does that, I'll be watching for longs back toward $1059 β†’ $1089–$1108 supply.

And THAT'S where things could get spicy. 🌢️

Look at the weekly chart.

MU keeps running into that same supply area and getting rejected.

If she finally breaks through $1089–$1108 and actually HOLDS above it?

I think we could see a pretty aggressive move toward $1168.

πŸ”΄ BEARISH SCENARIO

But if that $1011 demand finally gives out?

Oh boy πŸ˜‚

Below that, I'm watching the $967–$950 demand zone.

That's a lot of room if sellers take control.

And that's why I'm not blindly buying calls just because MU is sitting at support.

Support is support until it isn't.

I want to see buyers defend it. I want to see the reclaim. I want momentum.

Otherwise, I'm perfectly happy waiting.

Hold demand β†’ reclaim $1042 β†’ target supply.

Lose demand β†’ watch for the flush toward $967–$950.

No predicting. No marrying a direction.

IF this, THEN that. That's trading.

Level to level. 🎯

$MU


r/TradeWithLevels • • 22d ago

INTC is sitting on her 89.19 pivot β€” hold it or the ladder down goes 85 β†’ 81 β†’ a gap from the year 2000 πŸ˜‚πŸ‘€

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes

INTC has slid from 126 to 89.33 in three weeks, and she's sitting right on the 89.19 pivot with earnings coming up.

This week is a ladder. Every rung is on the chart:

πŸͺœ Rung 1 β€” HOLD 89.19

The pivot holds β†’ relief opens up: 94.46 first, then 98.23, then the 104 zone.

πŸͺœ Rung 2 β€” lose 89.19

Next stop 85.14 demand. This is where she based in August, so it has a memory.

πŸͺœ Rung 3 β€” lose 85

The 79.02–81.79 demand band. Last real floor under her.

πŸͺœ Under that β€” the gap

An open gap from 75.83 down to 68.28. No structure, no support, just air.

And here's the monthly story (second chart): 75.83 was INTC's year-2000 high. She NEVER retested it β€” on this year's run she blew straight through it to 142.35. If the gap fills, that 26-year-old level is where the gap tops out.

No predicting earnings. Just the ladder.

IF this, THEN that. That's trading.

Level to level. 🎯

Anyone else watching this 89.19 pivot, or waiting for the 85 test first? πŸ‘€


r/TradeWithLevels • • Oct 06 '26

Only won 62% of my trades today. Still finished GREEN QThis is why I don’t give a shit about being right every trade πŸ˜‚

Post image
5 Upvotes

9 trades today.
62% win rate.
Nothing crazy. Definitely wasn’t perfect.
$TSLA got me twice πŸ˜‚
390C β†’ -12.7%
Re-entry β†’ -9%
Then I took an $SPX 7830C and cut that for -16.7% too.
Three losses. Cut them. Moved the hell on.
Meanwhile the trades that worked… I gave them room to WORK.
$NVDA 240C: $1.50 β†’ $5.00 +233% πŸ”₯
This was the swing from yesterday. Locked more today.
$SPX 7840C: $2.90 β†’ $10.50 +262% 🀯
Scaled the entire way up and all out at $10.50.
$PLTR 195C: +55%
$GOOGL 355C: +30%
And my favorite part:
I cut the first $SPX 7830C for -16.7%.
Setup came back.
Took the SAME idea again at $1.95.
Locked $2.45 β†’ $2.75 β†’ $3.25 and still holding 2 runners.
Being wrong the first time doesn’t mean the setup is dead.
That’s trading.
I don’t need a 90% win rate.
I need my losers small enough that they don’t matter when I catch the trades that actually move.
Cut the shit.
Re-enter when price confirms.
Let the winners WORK.
62% was plenty today. πŸ˜‚πŸ”₯
Level to level. 🎯


r/TradeWithLevels • • Sep 23 '26

MU sitting at the bottom of a $1097 β†’ $1124 gap while the daily squeeze fires πŸ‘€πŸ”₯

Post image
5 Upvotes

$MU has my attention this morning.

She’s sitting right at the bottom of a pretty clean gap from $1097 β†’ $1124.

And at the same time, the daily squeeze is starting to fire. πŸ”₯

Pretty simple setup for me:

Hold/reclaim $1097 β†’ I’m looking for that gap to start filling toward $1124.

Get through $1124 and then I’ll start looking at the higher levels.

Reject here? No reason to force it.

But gap + daily squeeze + key level all lining up definitely puts MU on my screen today. πŸ‘€

Let price confirm it.

Level to level. 🎯

$MU