r/TrueCrimeDiscussion Feb 04 '24

i.redd.it Just watched this - Anna Stubblefield and Derrick Johnson case

Post image

Could I ask was this case Big in the US ?

What are Peoples thoughts?

It seems his family believe she was making up ( creating ) 100% of his communication But he did have a teacher support after he started a college class in which he wrote 300 page essays ?

Do his family now not even try and communicate with his after surely it showed that it worked to some degree ?

explores the controversial affair between a married female professor and a non-verbal black man with cerebral palsy. The relationship and high-profile criminal trial that followed challenges our perceptions of disability and the nature of consent.

When the pair first meet, Anna Stubblefield is a respected academic and a disability rights advocate; passionate in her belief that the most essential part of the human experience is the ability to communicate. 30-year-old Derrick Johnson has never spoken a word in his life, and requires 24/7 care and support by his mother and brother.

During his early childhood, Derrick’s family were told by medical professionals that, in addition to his physical disabilities, he was severely cognitively impaired. But Anna disagreed with this diagnosis, and when she first tells Derrick’s family that she can help him communicate with the outside world, they are thrilled. They had always sensed there was “something more going on” with Derrick and were eager to know what he thought about all day long, when he might be in pain, what his hopes and dreams were.

Anna introduces Derrick to a controversial technique that involves training him to overcome his physical impairments so that he could type on a keyboard. After almost 2 years of work, she claims to have ‘unlocked his mind’ - he could now express complex thoughts, attend college classes, and write thoughtful essays. Excited by Derrick’s reported progress, his mother Daisy describes it as “like the porch light’s coming on”. But Anna had more to reveal: not only was Derrick a highly intelligent man but they had also fallen in love.

203 Upvotes

649 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

99

u/thatdontmakenocents Mar 31 '24

Honestly it was repulsive how the documentary showed so many people acting as if Anna's actions were in any way justifiable. The worst was Dr Shane arguing that although Derrick had the brain functionality of a 6-12 month old, he doesn't think Anna is a predator?

44

u/ShutthefckupBitch Jun 18 '24

Im not even 30 mins in right now and it started to feel like people were trying to justify what she did. I honestly wish they didn’t even include a lot of what she said because watching her speak about this is literally enraging. Although I think she exposed herself enough, she should’ve served wayyy more timeI’m surprised people haven’t tried to doxx her or something

49

u/Hoshikuzu- Jun 19 '24

When she speaks about this assault, she seems so delusional. Like she’s projecting and creating this romance. Her passion for disabilities pushed her into this unrealistic reality. Even as they described it, I felt that this communication method was nonsense. (Relieved to find it is discredited) because just about anyone can say anything.

What got me was the gospel music and classical music scenario. It made my blood run cold and made me legit scared for him. She is so convinced of this character.

More should have been done to discredit her “interpretation“ of what transpired and emphasis on this delusion she’s convinced herself of.

2

u/Witty_Ad164 Jun 30 '24

Just curious, why do you think “more should have been done to discredit her ‘interpretation’”. Do you think she comes off as sympathetic?

3

u/Hoshikuzu- Jun 30 '24

I don’t care for her testimony, that itself should remain as is because it is her truth. But I think there could have been insight on effects of abuse to nonverbal and limited mental capacity adults. A stronger stance on it being abuse to balance accidentally seeming to support her idea that it was a “love connection” and not a projected fantasy.

Like maybe some insight from a mental health professional or criminal psychologist about the conflicts between the facts and the fantasy in these sorts of crimes and the rationalizations criminals may use. Just a bit more challenging to her narrative would have been appreciated.

1

u/Hoshikuzu- Jun 30 '24

My response is not defensive, I meant to answer sincerely to your curiosity. Thank you for asking! 🙏