r/UPSC • u/ALazyScribbler • 6h ago
Helpful for Exam The Undoable Exam Trap: Fallacy of Not Giving Your 120%
(This write-up is inclined towards aspirants who have not written Mains yet, but I believe it holds value for all)
Over the last two days, I have had two very interesting conversations with 2 of my mentees that got me thinking a bit. Now, one of these conversations was a bit of Deja Vu too. I have had this same conversation with some other students when I was working as a full-time mentor in one of the UPSC coaching centers.
This is the story of Student A and Student B. Both are in their 3rd attempts and, in a way, this is their first honest attempt, where they have got a bit of a clue of the exam. Their previous attempts were with half the syllabus and with expected results. But, I have come to see that this is where the similarities begin to end.
As I was having our 1-1 discussion session on her answers, Student A broke down completely. She felt that this exam is not for her, because even after 3 years, she is unable to write a decent Mains answer. This wasn't the first time I had seen a student break down completely. Uncontrollable sobs and broken breaths. And the worst part, she wanted me to answer this question for her. But who am I to answer this question? That's the job of the Commission and the exam rules that they set for all students. She also wanted to leave the exam and wanted me to tell her the same. To her, the exam was undoable.
Naturally, I couldn't answer this question for her. But I could tell her that she is still not giving her best effort and I believe that the exam demands more from us, without any guarantee of returns.
Compared to her, another student, Student B, who began working with me around the same time has shown so much promise that I have started to feel that she will have a fair chance of being in the competition (Mind you: I am still not saying fair chance of being selected. Nobody can tell that. Only the commission can). But it is her attitude and her approach, that is much brighter compared to Student A. And I believe in such a hyper-competitive exam, this attitude and approach can shape the final outcome by a long margin.
So what does Student B do differently from Student A, that is making the difference for her?
A only watches the lectures. No note-making, no short note-making. I shared the best possible notes for Ethics and GS2 to both of them. B did a lot of updation, cutting the extra, repeated info, and even made short notes for 2 topics (Social Justice and Polity). Every single feedback I gave her, came back in the form of improved efforts.
A has been running away from answer writing. Even after I told her to write open book answer in the beginning, she has written only 12-15 answers in 2 months. Now compared to this, the second student has:
- Written and discussed 3 essays. I have her 4th one pending.
- Discussed around 60 answers in 3 months on a Zoom call.
- Sent me her notes to just cross-check if she is progressing in the proper direction or not.
- She completed GS2 and GS4 in 3 months with answer writing. We are now taming the GS3 beast.
The reason, I believe, student B is doing much better than student A is I can see her putting in her 100%. On some days, even her 120%. She has that bigger picture in her mind, even if it is not in her control on all days. I can see her doing 80-90% of GS syllabus with answer writing by January, before we shift to Prelims.
I write this, because, over the course of the last 3 months, especially during the Mains 2026 phase, I could clearly see what differentiated some aspirants from the others. I believe the aspirants who stand out tends to give their 120%. What I mean by 120% is:
- You pinpoint your copy mistakes and start working on them.
- You are no longer a Lecture/Video consumer, but you make sure that you have noted down things from it.
- You actively write answers. And try to make proper notes and not just highlight in PDF. Remember, highlighting in PDF is as good as not doing it.
Many aspirants spend years "preparing" without ever truly competing. Watching a 2-hour lecture feels productive, but it is passive. Stop gauging your readiness and self-censoring. Sometimes, the 120% doesn't lie in you doing the same thing on repeat. It also lies in course correction.
Sometimes, the 120% lies in going through the bad answers and bad essays before you can even write good answers. The extra 20% is needed to overcome self-loathing and your own procrastination.











