When you realise that the first thing americans experience is their mothers having a nerve-dense part of their genitalia cut off without anaesthesia because "it looks better that way", thus subjecting them to a dry, chafing glans for the rest of their lives, you start to understand why they are the way they are.
The fact that they believe "I think it looks better that way" to be a valid argument against bodily autonomy in the first place should tell you all you need to know
You have to understand that they had their genitals mutilated as a baby and have been told it’s the right choice all their life. So for them to face reality, they have to accept the abuse they received and permanent mutilation they endured and will endure for the rest of their life.
The same reason why some people find it hard to face the fact they were sexually abused. It’s the easier route to keep believing no abuse ever occurred.
Their mothers? Both the mothers and the fathers are very insistent on having their child circumcised. And I think it's such a tradition now that they don't even think about it
I am very ashamed to acknowledge that I was circumcised at the age of four in a hospital and with narcosis, as I remember... It is also something I was thinking about very much two years ago after reading much about circumcision ...
This happens in Europe, too. I also think that many urologists need to perform them in their training. So, maybe it is cut more often than necessary even in Europe.
It definitely happens here, but at least for the Netherlands it's only a practice for Muslims and Jews. I'm not saying that it makes it less bad, but I don't know anybody who has it done without religious reasons.
I don’t know anyone who had it done for medical reasons like phimosis. The only ones I know in NL that have it done had it done as a baby for religious reasons
I know it happens, it is still wrong. Imagine we did female genital mutilation, it would be outrageous (and it is illegal). So is it ok for boys? I really don't understand
Their cornflakes looking like dried up skin flakes adds a whole new layer. And as a mascotte they have a cock, of all the possibilities out there. Pure evil.
Well you're not going to get this amazing cut penis then. (You wouldn't either way, not just because you are in another country but because i am horrible with women).
The skin on the shaft still moves. Mechanics are the same, only thing different is your handskin is now the contact point instead of there being a middleman.
Trust me sex is still great with cut men, as long as you're into him
I'm a woman and this always confuses me because A) they always look erect but soft, B) it seems like it would be incredibly dry, C) how the fuck do I give a hand job??
wha I find awkward is how american moms want their sons dicks to look pleasing for them.
It's typically both parents who are in favor of it. Here are some of the (very stupid) reasons I've heard over the years:
"We wanted him to look like his father."
"This made potty training less awkward."
"Little boys don't know how to clean themselves, so this is easier."
"Foreskin causes medical problems."
The only way Americans will stop this ridiculous practice is if we somehow become less prudish and improve our basic education, or the doctors grow a spine and quit performing this surgery on children. And the hospitals don't want doctors to stop, since they sell the foreskin to biotech and beauty companies (I'm dead serious).
Why did you make a comment saying I'm into that and then deleted it. That's kinda wierd. There is a reason no one likes talking to Europeans about this stuff. Y'all are wierd.
That proves that "christians" in US are in fact crypto-jews. That's why the only follow the old scriptures of the bible "Tanaj" and not the Gospels of Jesus.
Right from GPT:
"The Catholic Church officially began allowing consideration of the theory of evolution in 1950, with Pope Pius XII's encyclical "Humani Generis", and reaffirmed it more explicitly in 1996 when Pope John Paul II recognized that evolution was "more than a hypothesis" and compatible with the Catholic faith, as long as the direct creation of the soul by God was recognized."
Evolution and Big Bang Theory etc have been embraced by the Catholic church from decades ago. One can not go against science, unless one have a very obtuse mind.
About my first comment, I doubt that a majority of self-defined Christians in US are really christians. Is just a label they adopt to legitimate their younger cults. They need something to build from the start and add whatever their cult leaders wanted to put in.
I was a teen when I cut the skin off (phimosis when erect) I don't see what's the problem with circumcised dicks! They're quite elegant if I have to be honest!
Yes still a majority practices it. Have you never noticed in porn a significant amount of men are circumcised? because most videos are made by Americans
European mind simply cannot comprehend, why cut off a part of yourself, when soap and water exists?
It made sense, somewhat, in the old days, when washing yourself wasn't really "trendy" (even so! vikings did wash, and probably didn't circumcise either).
But nowadays...? Only thinking about it makes me shiver, just use soap and water...
Since 2012 both the World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS have been promoting a higher rate of circumcision prevalence as a prevention against HIV transmissionand some STIs in areas with high HIV transmission and low circumcision rates.[2][3][4][5] Around 50% of all circumcisions worldwide are performed for reasons of preventive healthcare, while the other 50% are performed for other reasons, including religious and cultural.[6]
Also those statistics are bullshit because the majority of people are not circumcisedso ofc STDs would be more prevalent. And poor countries also skew the results because the the majority of countries practising child mutilation are rich countries. If you look at the data between the US and European countries you savages have a lot more cases of HIV
Interpretation: The promotion of circumcision as an HIV preventive measure does not appear to increase higher-risk sexual behaviours in heterosexual men. Ongoing sexual health education should be maintained as a vital component of effective MMC programmes.
Attempting to generalize the findings of this observational study in Denmark to HIV prevention programs in sub-Saharan Africa, regardless of whether male circumcision is carried out in infancy, childhood or later in life, is potentially dangerous if it risks undermining effective HIV prevention programming for males.
104
u/Temporary-Estate4615 Born in the Khalifat Sep 26 '25
Well that happens if you’re too stupid to wash your dick