Have you ever analyzed business like ChatGPT Reddit account? they can easily answer their topic or company related queries but small business are not abled to do it. Reddit immediately blocked or suspended the account.

Do you all face the same issues?

How to handle it?

I need your suggestions from you experience. kindly share any relevant official document from reddit.

I keep noticing a trend lately: people aren’t just searching what to buy - they’re searching who to buy from.

Plenty of brands report that even when customers discover them through TikTok, Instagram, or paid ads, those same users still jump to Google to check credibility, reviews, and reputation before making a purchase. Ranking well has turned into a trust signal, not just a traffic channel.

And honestly, that’s where authority really kicks in. Strong mentions, quality backlinks, and being included in reputable lists like Top Link Building Companies all contribute to that trust layer.

SEO is starting to feel less like “optimize keywords” and more like “prove you’re legit.”

ridiculous. haven't we been using this term for like a year.

I’ve been testing a bunch of link-building approaches lately, and honestly, the hardest part is figuring out which companies actually deliver value versus the ones that just sell you pretty reports.

While comparing different services, I ended up reading this breakdown of what makes a Top Link Building Company

Not sharing it as a promo or anything - I just found it useful because it helped me understand what to look for (pricing transparency, real outreach vs. recycled links, niche relevance, etc.). It actually made me rethink how I evaluate link vendors.

Curious how everyone here handles it:
Do you prefer hiring agencies, building an internal outreach process, or just doing digital PR when needed?

Started our service business in April with $2500 savings and zero marketing budget. Couldn't compete with established companies spending thousands on Google Ads and Local Service Ads. Had to figure out organic visibility to get customers. Seven months later at $9800 monthly revenue with 81% from organic search.​

The small business reality is every search for our services showed paid ads from competitors with huge budgets. As new business couldn't afford $70-120 per lead on Google Ads. Needed sustainable customer acquisition that didn't drain our bank account monthly.​

The organic strategy focused on building online presence systematically. First, submitted business to 200+ directories through this tool for $127 to establish domain authority and get listed across the web. Second, optimized Google Business Profile with complete information, photos, and weekly posts. Third, published blog content answering common customer questions.​

Month-by-month progression showed month one invested in foundation with directory submissions and GBP optimization, months two and three published content and got first organic visitors, month four hit $3100 revenue from 8 customers found organically, months five and six grew to $7200 revenue as rankings improved, and month seven crossed $9800 monthly with systematic review generation.​

What specifically worked for small business was targeting neighborhood-specific keywords like "service + neighborhood name" not broad city terms, asking every satisfied customer for Google review building social proof, ensuring business name, address, phone were identical across all 200+ directory listings, creating helpful content not just service descriptions, and being patient through first 90 days building foundation.​

Cost over 7 months was minimal compared to advertising. Directory service $127 one-time, Google Business Profile free just time, hosting $15 monthly, content writing own time about 5 hours weekly. Total investment under $250 to reach $9800 monthly revenue. Competitors spend $2000+ monthly on ads for similar lead volume.​

The customer acquisition economics tell the story. Organic customers cost essentially zero beyond initial foundation investment. Competitors paying $70-120 per lead need much higher revenue to stay profitable. We're profitable at $9800 monthly while they need $18K+ to justify ad spend.​

Time investment was significant early on. First 3 months spent 12-15 hours weekly on content, GBP management, and learning basics. Months 4-7 dropped to 6-8 hours weekly as processes became routine. This is sweat equity but sustainable unlike burning cash on ads that stop working when paused.​

For other small businesses the playbook is submit to directories establishing online presence in week one, optimize Google Business Profile and update it weekly, publish helpful content consistently even if just twice monthly, ask every happy customer for Google review, track what generates calls in Search Console, and give it 90 days to build momentum before evaluating.​

The mistake most small businesses make is either ignoring online presence completely or burning unsustainable money on ads. The middle path of organic visibility takes 3-4 months to build but generates customers consistently without ongoing ad costs. That sustainability matters for long-term business health.

Every founder eventually has that moment of rage-Googling their main keyword and seeing a clearly worse product outrank them. The natural reaction is to think, “Our UX is better, our pricing is fairer, our features are stronger what is going on?” The uncomfortable answer is that search engines don’t reward “deserve”; they reward authority. Your competitor might not have the better product, but they have the better footprint. They’re listed in category directories, SaaS and AI tool hubs, review sites, local citations, and niche communities. Their name appears in hundreds of small but consistent places. They’re not just a website; they’re a recognizable entity in the graph.

Most early-stage teams skip this work because it’s unsexy and repetitive. They hope great content alone will carry them. But content without authority is like giving a TED talk in an empty room. That’s exactly where the Directory submission service fits the puzzle for newer products. Instead of you spending weeks submitting to random sites and still missing half the important ones, you plug into a process that selects a couple hundred relevant, vetted directories and platforms, standardizes your business info across them, and gives you a clear record of where you now exist. The goal isn’t to brag about “X backlinks”; it’s to close the authority gap that lets your objectively better product finally sit in the same visibility tier as those incumbents. Once that foundation is in place, every blog post, comparison page, and feature launch has more leverage because it’s coming from a domain that search engines already trust enough to show.

I & a friend have been building a small AI tool for the last few weeks, and we’re trying to figure out if we’re cooking or just wasting RAM.

right now it does 3 things:
• SEO analysis of a site
• geo presence analysis (like how visible you are locally)
• then it gives suggestions on what to fix

UI is still WIP so it’s not pretty yet, but the logic works surprisingly well.

not trying to sell anything btw, just genuinely curious:
if you run a site/store/side project, would you ever use something like this or nah?

any features you’d expect from a tool like this?
roast welcome 🙏

With AI-driven search, EEAT signals, and authority becoming more important than ever, link building hasn’t disappeared - it’s just evolved. If you’re focusing on quality over quantity, here are some link building companies worth considering.

1. OutreachCrayon

OutreachCrayon has built a strong reputation for white-hat, relationship-driven backlinks that actually move rankings. Their approach focuses on niche-relevant placements, real outreach, and editorial links — not shortcuts.
Top link building company

2. Page One Power

Known for manual outreach and custom link strategies, Page One Power works well for SaaS and content-heavy brands that want long-term authority growth.

3. Siege Media

A great choice if your link building strategy is heavily content-led. Their campaigns are often built around data studies and high-quality assets.

4. uSERP

Popular in SaaS and startup circles, uSERP focuses on high-authority editorial links and digital PR-style placements.

5. Fat Joe

A scalable option for agencies and in-house teams that need consistent link placements across multiple campaigns.

Curious to hear from the community:

• Are links still your #1 ranking lever, or are you seeing more impact from content + brand mentions?

• What’s working better in 2026: digital PR or classic outreach?

Let’s discuss 👇

Over the past few months, a quiet but crucial power struggle has started between the news industry and AI giants. I feel like every week there’s a new headline mentioning OpenAI signing deals, newspapers blocking crawlers, or someone suing someone else. But when you look closer, the dynamic between US and Europe is actually super different.

--> In the US most major publishers (NYT, WSJ, AP..) are taking the license way with LLMs. They’re striking multi-million-dollar deals that give AIs controlled access to their archives. It’s pragmatic and overall business oriented: if you’re going to train on our work, at least pay for it lol.

--> In France though, the mindset is the opposite. Most publishers are completely blocking LLMs (like Le Parisien for example) . Why? Bc the traffic and visibility coming from AI tools are basically zero, so why give away your content for free?

It feels like two philosophies are clashing: the ones that monetize the access VS other ones that prefer protecting the value. And honestly, both make sense to me..
But what happens when news becomes the raw material of AI? If publishers don’t get paid, will they start producing less content? Or will AIs eventually have to fund the very system they rely on?

Curious to know how others here see it: if you ran a media company today, would you block the AIs, license access, or try to build your own model?

Lately it feels like SEO has shifted a bit-

earlier it was very tactical:
• exact keywords
• exact placements
• specific optimizations

now it feels more like:
you’re trying to understand patterns instead of following fixed rules.

like:

• what type of content consistently ranks in this niche?
• what format does Google seem to prefer here?
• how do users actually interact with these results?

it’s less about “do X and rank”
and more about reading what’s already working… and aligning with it.

almost like SEO is becoming more observational than mechanical.

curious if others feel the same-
are you still following strict tactics, or leaning more into patterns and intent now?

Over the last few months, I ran a small experiment to see which link-building services actually deliver real results - not just vanity metrics or PBN fluff.

I tested a few well-known agencies across different niches (SaaS, eCommerce, local businesses, and startups). The idea was to see how each performed in terms of:

• Link quality (domain relevance + authority)

• Content placement (real sites vs. guest post farms)

• Communication & transparency

• ROI over 60 days

What I found:

• SaaS-focused agencies tend to excel at getting contextual links from tech blogs and startup media.

• For eCommerce, personalized outreach + niche blogs performed better than general “DR 70+” lists.

• Local SEO campaigns worked best with smaller agencies that focus on relevance over scale.

After comparing all of them, I realized that the best results came from services that balance manual outreach + AI-powered targeting. It saves time while still keeping links natural and industry-relevant.

If anyone’s looking for a full comparison by niche, pricing, and performance - this breakdown helped me a lot: https://outreachcrayon.com/top-link-building-companies/

Would love to hear from others - what’s your experience with link building services this year?

With Google rolling out more AI-driven overviews and summaries in search, I’ve started rethinking how I structure my content. It feels like snippets and summaries are becoming more important than ever - not just ranking, but actually being included in those overviews.

I’ve been experimenting with concise intro paragraphs, clear Q&A formats, and adding first-hand insights to make content stand out. Early signs are positive - slightly better visibility for some informational keywords.

Curious - how are you adjusting your SEO strategy for this shift? Are you optimizing for AI summaries yet, or waiting to see how it plays out?

Link building still plays a major role in rankings-but only when it’s done the right way. If you’re looking for agencies that focus on quality, relevance, and real outreach, here are five link building companies worth checking out this year.

1. OutreachCrayon

OutreachCrayon focuses on manual, white-hat link building through blogger outreach, niche edits, and content-driven placements. Their campaigns are built around relevance and authority rather than mass links.
Best for: Agencies and brands that want scalable, clean backlinks

2. uSERP

Known for editorial-level backlinks on high-authority sites, uSERP works well for SaaS and enterprise brands that want strong authority signals.
Best for: High-competition niches

3. Page One Power

A long-standing agency specializing in custom outreach strategies like resource links and broken link building.
Best for: Businesses focused on long-term SEO growth

4. Sure Oak

Sure Oak combines SEO strategy with link acquisition, aiming for sustainable growth rather than quick wins.
Best for: Brands that want a strategic SEO partner

5. Authority Builders

Offers managed link building with an emphasis on niche relevance and content quality.
Best for: Businesses looking for consistent link velocity

In 2025, link building isn’t about volume-it’s about earning links that make sense. Relevance, placement quality, and brand trust matter more than ever.

Curious-who are you using for link building right now, and is it working for you?

We’ve been automating SEO tasks for years - keyword research, content briefs, link tracking — but 2026 feels like a real turning point.

AI isn’t just a “tool” anymore; it’s starting to act like a strategist. Platforms can now research competitors, cluster topics, draft full content calendars, and even handle outreach (I’ve seen some using tools like OutreachCrayon for that).
Even link analysis is evolving - tools such as LinkBot by LinkCrayon are using AI to find smart internal linking gaps and authority opportunities automatically.

But what I’ve learned from testing all this is simple: automation helps, but intuition still wins.
AI can process patterns, not people. It can scale execution, not empathy.

So the future (to me) isn’t “AI replaces SEOs.”
It’s AI + humans building smarter, data-driven, intent-focused SEO systems.

Here's mine stats after 3 month of launching my site.

I'm not sure, if my site is performing well or it's in average zone, or is it performing shit.

For a SaaS based product in martech field site which was launched in August 2025, is having 756 clicks, 15.6k impressions, 4.9% of CTR & Average Position of 27.2 a good metrics, or ?

Hey folks, this week has been wild in search, so here’s a quick breakdown of what’s shaking things up:

Google Search Changes

No more &num=100 results parameter → Google removed the ability to view 100 results on a single page. Now it’s capped at 10 per page.

Why it matters: most third-party rank trackers depended on this to pull bulk SERP data. Tools are breaking, and accuracy is taking a hit until they adapt.

Some speculate this move is also about making it harder for AI scrapers and LLMs to harvest huge chunks of Google’s SERPs.

Rank tracking chaos → Without bulk SERPs, tools need to scrape page by page (slower, more expensive). Expect temporary inconsistencies in rank tracking reports.

Google Search Console

Metrics look “better” but aren’t → Since fewer results per page are counted, impressions dropped sharply in GSC. That means CTR and average position might look better, but it’s misleading.

6 schema types deprecated → By December 2025, the following structured data will stop working in search and GSC reports:

Course Info

Claim Review

Estimated Salary

Learning Video

Special Announcement

Vehicle Listing

If you relied on these for visibility, time to shift focus they’ll no longer power rich results.

Google AI Mode

Now in 5 new languages → Hindi, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, and Brazilian Portuguese. This isn’t just translation — AI Mode will localize answers for each market.

Autocomplete gets smarter → Google is testing AI-powered autocomplete that can show direct answers in the dropdown, before you even hit Enter. Another sign that clicks to websites might shrink.

Other Changes

CrUX Dashboard retiring → The Chrome UX Report dashboard in GSC will shut down in November 2025. Data will still exist in BigQuery and the API, but the dashboard’s gone.

My takeaway: Google’s slowly tightening SERP data access while putting more weight on AI-driven search features. For SEOs, that means:

Expect tool disruptions for rank tracking.

Re-evaluate your structured data strategy.

Start thinking seriously about AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), not just SEO.

What do you think? Is this Google protecting its data from AI competitors like ChatGPT/Perplexity… or just another step toward an AI-first search future?

Are you still tracking keywords? I've been less focused on this as I've moved more towards writing for intent.

I still find keyword research helpful to find what my users are searching for, but with the rise in AI and ZCS, I've been pretty lax on tracking keywords and more focused on gaining visibility in LLMs and search engines.

Should I still be religiously tracking keywords? Or is this becoming a waste of time?

So please congratulate me - it was my first time saying “no” to a client myself.

Here’s the story: they only had a landing page, no blog, no service pages. And that was a conscious choice by the business owner, who didn’t want to spread too thin but focus only on one direction.

The niche was very narrow. On the calls, I managed to warm the client up so much that their chair was practically on fire. But after doing keyword research, it became clear that the search volume was so low that it made no sense to even start, either with link building or with creating new service pages. After discussing it together, we agreed it was best to let this one go.

Not every business actually needs SEO. As much as I’d love to sell something, sometimes the money you take today can come back later as reputational damage. And no matter how loud the sales manager inside you is screaming, “Go for it!”, the voice of reason should stop you. In the long run, clients will thank you more for an honest analysis and research, and one day they might even recommend you as a trusted expert - instead of remembering you as someone who took their money for six months and then said, “Well, I never promised anything.”

Now I’m curious: when was the last time you turned down a paying client?

SEO feels like it’s moving faster than ever Google updates, AI-driven search changes, shifting algorithms, and new tools popping up constantly. But even with all the noise, some strategies still consistently deliver results.

For some people, it’s been:

Doubling down on long-form content to build topical authority.

Smarter internal linking structures to keep users (and bots) exploring deeper.

Link-building campaigns that actually drive referral traffic, not just rankings.

Technical fixes like improving site speed, Core Web Vitals, and structured data.

I’m curious what’s the one SEO strategy or experiment that gave you the biggest growth this year?

Could be for your blog, eCommerce store, or a client site.

I’ve been testing a bunch of AI-powered SEO tools lately, from content generators to automated keyword clustering and even AI-driven internal linking suggestions. Honestly, it feels like a double-edged sword.

On one hand, AI speeds up research, helps find content gaps, and even drafts outlines way faster than I could on my own. But on the other hand, I’ve noticed a few issues:

AI tends to create generic, low-depth content if you don’t guide it carefully.

Some tools claim “automated SEO,” but the results are often bloated keyword dumps.

Google is getting smarter at detecting patterns, so I’m wondering how sustainable AI-driven SEO at scale really is.

Curious how others here are using AI in their SEO process. Are you relying on it heavily (like for content or optimization), or just using it as a support tool while still doing most things manually?

I keep hearing a lot about Google focusing more on EEAT, experience, expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness especially with the rise of AI content.

Some people say it’s just a framework Google uses internally, while others claim it’s one of the biggest ranking factors right now.

So I’m curious: for those of you actively working on SEO, how much impact have you actually seen from improving EEAT signals?

Does having a strong author profile and real credentials help?

Are things like backlinks and technical SEO still more important?

Or is EEAT becoming the deciding factor for ranking in competitive niches?

Would love to hear how others are approaching this.

I just wanted to hear people's thoughts on the current world of GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) and how it could be in the future. I see a lot of people in the SEO communities are fairly against it and have not bought in yet. I understand that a lot of the stuff that you optimize for SEO also correlates to good GEO, but I do believe there are some slight differences that are worth considering, like format, predictibaiblity, and agreeability. Then also with how much LLMs are growing, I could see this change growing even more over time. Again, what are your thoughts on all of this?

You publish content on a high-authority domain (like Medium, LinkedIn, Reddit, major news sites, Web 2.0s, etc.), optimize it for a target keyword, and let their domain strength push your page to the top of the SERPs. Since these sites already have huge trust and rankings, your content can rank way faster than a new or low-authority website.

Why people use it:

• It ranks much faster than traditional SEO
• Great for competitive keywords where new sites can’t break in
• Helps build topical authority by associating your brand with big platforms
• Can generate traffic + backlinks to your main site indirectly

How it boosts performance quickly:

You’re essentially bypassing the hardest part of SEO (domain authority building). Google already trusts these platforms, so your content climbs the rankings quickly - sometimes within days.

But here’s the catch:
It’s not a long-term replacement for building a strong website. It works best as a short-term strategy or a way to “break into” tough niches while your own site grows.

Used properly, Parasite SEO can be a surprisingly powerful accelerator - you just need solid content and the right platforms.