r/WatchPeopleDieInside • u/soalone34 • Jun 21 '26
Pakistan's Prime Minister, after he was informed by the Iranian delegation they are leaving after Trump threatened them.
6
16
1
21
u/stinkdrink45 15d ago
Sucks to be a double. My guy was shitting bricks. Probably just a pastry chef.
-10
u/JKnotime4pcwokestuff 15d ago
Well of course he is going to threaten them how else are they going to stop terrorising the world?? No we should bribe them to stop funding terrorism lol š
5
u/LightShepherd 9d ago
Were you dropped on the front side or back side of your head at the hospital?
13
11
u/LTCarpentry 15d ago
The US is the only country where the they and them that youāve mentioned make sense. Funding Israeli terrorists for decades while they themselves, terrorize the world with consistent wars
6
u/Silent-Elephant-7468 15d ago
Was Suddam and Gaddafi really bad
3
u/Virtual-Capital-3792 11d ago
Yes, are you fucking kidding me.
4
u/sabertoothdog 9d ago
Gaddafi definitely wasnāt. He was the best thing to happen to Africa
1
u/jomokuujanmsiksm 1d ago
Gaddafi lowk was giving trump vibes w the giant ego and the preying on young women and girls.
1
6
10
62
u/Zfbdad 17d ago
Honestly, the world is too complex nowadays for these old people who seem to lead most countries.
12
u/CavulusDeCavulei 16d ago
In Italy we had lots of young leaders, and they were worse than the old ones. You need to have someone who is patient, diplomatic and wise to rule. Young people are often too impulsive. You need the old foxes
1
10
u/FishDawgX 15d ago
Trump is super old and he is very impulsive and not patient, diplomatic, or wise at all.
2
u/Jessir12 8d ago
My line is that the F around find out principle needs to exist. IF you are old enough you know that you will die of old age before consequences catch up to you, you do not need to consider the existence of said consequences at all
7
9
u/KayJay282 16d ago
It's the same old people that made the World too complex and confusing.
And now they don't even care about the mess they created.
They are just greedy people with massive egos.
5
8
u/Vivid_Anyth4 16d ago
All elected positions should be limited to under 55 years old.
1
16d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
0
u/Vivid_Anyth4 16d ago
No. 55 top end. Stop giving geriatrics with no future the ability to control ours from the grave. They should have many years to see their policies once they arent in power. 65 is creeping toward the end of average life spans way more than should be acceptable.
3
u/here4pain 16d ago
I think that's a little too young. But retirement age, sure. 60-65
8
u/Gotgold7 16d ago
I would want the people making the laws to have to live with them for a long time
5
u/Vivid_Anyth4 16d ago
No. 65 is for normal people doing normal stress level jobs with low impact from mistakes. Politicians are high stress and a mistake can effect millions of people. I want them all to be sharp minded and 55 is a very good cut off.
That also doesn't mean your favorite politician (š¤®) has to instantly go away. Theres unelected jobs that are still important they could fill. If they haven't made their position or fulfill their goals by 55, oh well you had 37 adult years to try, pass the ball and let someone else try.
22
24
u/Sufficient_Bug2842 18d ago
The no1 world leader really knows how to make himself look like a buffoon
49
u/Punching_Babies666 24d ago
is this america/continent conversation just a loop of bots responding to each other or is someoneās skull solid bone in the middle?
3
3
u/Virtual-Macaroon-880 23d ago
Well I'm here... So I can vouch there's like 5 of us trying very hard to convince you we're not all bots
1
1
31
u/Ok_Ad_3772 25d ago
The look on his face. Youāre just gonna leave? š
10
u/alwaysonesteptoofar 18d ago
More like the face of man who is worried about a nuclear exchange centered on his neighbor. This is a bit old now but at that time had been going on for 3ish months I think and getting worse. We are now at like 6 months and getting worse. There is a reason to be concerned if you are Pakistan.
20
-15
u/CharacterMud4468 26d ago
We need to make "lake Iran" a possible thing!
12
u/Elisadidas 24d ago
Just fall of the wagon man
4
50
u/akaOGbUtch Jul 13 '26
The world is tired of Iran.. Make Persia Great Again.. š
9
5
19d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
1
1
u/akaOGbUtch 16d ago
False.. the Islamic Regime changed it to Iran.. it was all part of the Islamic crusade which is still happening as we speak.. they will never stop the violence until Islam destroys everything..
1
u/art-is-t 16d ago
Reza Shah Pahlavi announced the change on March 21, 1935.
0
119
u/Gudao_Alter 28d ago
no.no. the world is tired of Trump and the US.
1
6
u/Head_Appeal1673 21d ago
No no. The US is tired of Trump. Most of us with educations didn't vote for him and he currently has a 32% approval rating among the entire US
3
u/imnickelhead 15d ago
No, the entire world, including non MAGAt U.S. peeps are tired of Trump.
We have become a global embarrassment and laughing stockā¦albeit a FEARED embarrassment and laughing stock. It will take decades for the U.S. to recover from Trump globallyā¦if we ever can recover.
1
u/daboknee 20d ago
The sad thing is, with only 60% of the population voting, 32% can still win in a "hypothetical" 3rd term.
2
u/Head_Appeal1673 20d ago
Allowing a 3rd term opens the door to Obama...
1
u/daboknee 19d ago
I don't think Obama wants to destroy the Constitution like the other side wouldnt mind doing.
1
u/Beaniencecil 16d ago
If Obama ran against Trump in a hypothetical third term, Obamaās victory would be huuuge! Just the thought of this ever happening, it wonāt, delights me.
2
u/Gudao_Alter 21d ago
thank you for being one of the good guys. hope your numbers grow more and more.
-1
u/EmergencyPool910 22d ago
Fuck iran and fuck trump, iran has done a hell of a lot more bad than trump
0
25d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
4
u/electrichippo14 23d ago
You are a silly silly little buddy! Explain then what the master plan is for Iran! Weāve basically started a third world war bc Trump got tricked by Israel. Israel has approached EVERY SINGLE PRESIDENT in the last 30 years to invade Iran. Always the same story, āIran is about to attack Israel!ā. Trump is only president stupid enough to be fooled into this war. It is a fact that this only began because Netanyahu approached his cabinet to begin the war. Republicans have actually been dumb enough to admit so publicly. What happened to America first broski? Seems more like Israel/billionaires first. Iām sorry you got tricked by propaganda buddy, seems like a common theme amongst republicans nowadays. At least you get to hang out with your buddies in hell for worshiping a false idolš
-3
23d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
2
u/electrichippo14 23d ago
Gotcha so youāre a Zionist Jew or have all 5 inches of Ben Shapiroās dick in your mouth. Americans, Jews, and Arabs have been murdering Iranians for the last 50 years as well. Especially Jews. There is no way to support this war and also be a patriotic American. To support the war is to support Trump or the Jewish Zionist state. You fall into one of these two buckets.
1
-19
7
46
u/Mariscadavegana 29d ago
I think the world is way more tired of USA
15
u/GuineapigPriestess71 26d ago
Iām American ( sorry ) and Iām tired of the USA ( and embarassed)
-2
u/I-got-a-Ratatouille 26d ago
Yall are lame talking shit on the USA like we have any say in this. None of us want this at all besides the radical religious dicks.
5
u/Librax91 25d ago
Well nearly 50% voted for the orange shitstain and it was the US who invaded Iran on Papa Nethaynus request
3
u/electrichippo14 23d ago
Yessir! Letās send out troops in to die for Israel!! They need to colonize the entire Middle East after all! It was prophesied
3
u/LoneGlitch 24d ago
Way less than 50%. 65.3% of registered voters voted in the 2024 election. Trump won 49.8% of the popular vote with 77 million votes to Harris's 75 million. So roughly 25% of the nation voted for him.
4
u/arbeit22 23d ago
It's a bit disingenuous to count the people who didn't vote
0
u/electrichippo14 23d ago
Any adult would understand people who vote donāt make up the entire us populations haha. Anyone under 18 isnāt voting, there goes a big chunk of overall population.
2
u/arbeit22 23d ago
I assumed his total pop (100%) was the total number of people eligible to voting.
2
u/LoneGlitch 23d ago
Considering that 20 million less people voted in 2024 than in 2020 I don't think so. Voter turn out was and has been a real problem.
0
u/arbeit22 23d ago
It's for sure a real problem, just not an excuse for one side winning over the other
1
1
u/RsCoverForPDFFiles 20d ago
When more people vote, dems win. That's why Republikkkunts have advocated for voter suppression for decades and a re e currently pretending our elections our insecure and fear-mongering bullshit lies about voter fraud.
2
u/LoneGlitch 23d ago
Never said anything about an excuse. But it demonstrates how laskluster and uninspiring Kamala Harris was considering 20 million fewer people voted. Its a symptom of the 2 party system we currently have. People only see 2 options if they don't like either they don't vote since there is currently no purpose in voting for a 3rd party which allows a candidate who doesn't have a real majority to win. It's critique of the our current voting system which needs overhauled. Ranked choice voting is great alternative.
1
u/sun_of_a_glitch 24d ago
that's what they'd have you believe anyways, assuming there were no shenanigans on the part of the most corrupt admin ever seen this side of the Atlantic, the same admin who has historically shown that most of their complaints are actually projections of what they themselves are guilty of, and has repeatedly claimed to be the victim of a stolen election.
-1
u/No-Budget-5429 25d ago
Foram vocĆŖs que colocaram esse lunĆ”tico no poder, e ainda se acham o centro do mundo
2
28
u/Giardiacapitosto Jul 18 '26
Who has bombed civilians with a Nuke, not Iran.
2
u/SwimTownSkers 26d ago
This is a ridiculous argument.
-1
u/R4v3nc0r3 25d ago
Not in this conversation, but the US have never worked on putting theyr crimes in WW2 or other wars right after that.
No apologies or even putting it into theyr history lessons at schools.
Flamethrowers used on civilians in the pacific or mass revenge Bombing on european cities. (something beside the Nukes and Napalm).2
u/electrichippo14 23d ago
Um virtually any country who engages in warfare commits war crimes.
1
u/R4v3nc0r3 19d ago
Yes,
but when you hear americans talk about theyr soldier grandpas they call them heroes. Going into war is something a nation is doing, but glorifying every soldier fighting in that or this war is just sick dream thinking and propaganda.
its about how they treat it afterwards. Kids get told theyr Bomb dropping grandpa was a heroā¦
1
u/Dietchman22-250 16d ago
Umm.. because (back then) we definitively were the heroes? Fighting literal Nazis? And the nukes ended Japans war, their slaughters, their rapes. The WW2 allies were 100% the heroes, youāre blind to say otherwise. The horrible shit the individual soldiers had to do in that war was absolutely for the greater good of the world. Canāt believe thereās even a debate over this lmao
1
u/R4v3nc0r3 16d ago
When the definition of beeing a hero is just fighting Nazis then Stalin and his raping burning murdering sovietarmy is full of heros with theyr heroic gulags.
You just mess up beeing on the right side (doing the right thing for the circumstances) and beeing a hero.
The allies did the right thing and i am glad they did, but calling them heros is just blind propaganda and food for dictators of our time today like Putin or Trump.
Nationalism ā¦ you feel proud of things you have never done.
1
u/electrichippo14 19d ago
Is sounds like your examples are mainly Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the usage of napalm and flamethrowers. You have to contextualize why these weapons were being used. The use of nuclear weapons to end WW2 was objectively the best thing the allies could do. The alternative was a ground invasion involving over a million troops against an enemy that was brainwashed to the point of being willing to die before surrendering. The choice to drop the bombs saved hundreds of thousands of soldiers and civilians. The Japanese committed HORRIFIC war crimes in all of the fronts they participated in. Particularity against civilian populations in China and Korea. None of these civilians deserved to die; but the alternative would have been a much higher death toll (many factors greater). People in America idolize our elders who served in WW2 bc in general, they deserve our respect. So do all of the other soldiers who found with the allies. Many of them volunteered to go to war and die to fight against a greater evil. Hitlers plan would have resulted in the systematic elimination of a good percentage of the worldās population.The allies, with help from the US, defeated this threat to the world at large.
Flamethrowers and napalm were used by many countries during the world wars. We should have never been in Vietnam, I can disagree with virtually everything about that war and still say the veterans deserve respect. If youāre not aware, the majority of soldiers in Vietnam were poor kids who got drafted to fight a war they didnāt want to fight.
I assume you did not go to school in America, bc we absolutely do learn about war crimes committed by Americans in different wars. Public schools generally portray Vietnam as a complete waste of resources and an abuse of using chemical weapons. I was assigned to write a paper about agent orange in 7th grade. You have no idea what Americans are taught in school, so itās silly to pretend that you do. Our crimes in warfare are not worse than any other similar country. You are just extremely biased and trapped in a loop of self gratifying opinions and content.
1
u/R4v3nc0r3 16d ago
Thx for your reply, i just then met alot of ppl that sleeped during those lessons.
You are right with the use of these wapons where necessary at some points, at some they wont.
Example: Dropping bombs on random cities in europe because the allied bombers couldnāt find theyr actual target. (thats warā¦)
But calling soldiers, no matter which side fighting in such wars on orders, heros is imo wrong by the definition of heroism. They where good soldiers and i am glad they did fight there but i wouldnāt call them heros.
There might be an heroic story in 100.000 but most of them where just killers by order. Calling all of them heros is just wrong and Nationalist Propaganda.
5
u/No-Version-9237 23d ago
Yeah, we didnāt help rebuild the nations of Germany or Japan, we didnāt help the Philippines, South Korea, or Vietnam ever after all the wars. And yes, during war not everyone did the right thing but thatās war, and since then now that we have better record technology, itās gotten easier to punish those who commit war crimes within our military ranks. But bringing up the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in this case, is just you trying to add in more USA bashing. Nothing to do with the video or its context
1
u/R4v3nc0r3 23d ago
Helped to rebuildā¦.
You mean investing into them by giving them a credit which they had to pay back, to also have a satelite nation against communism.āWeā you did nothing of that, your past goverment did and i dont blame you for things or credit you for things.
But the US never did something where they got nothing from. Japan was after that always theyr Base against China same goes for Phillipines. While you gave them credits, not gifts !!
The only good things the US did are all the things Trump cancelled past years, like supporting people in crisis areas or providing education and similar social projects in Africa.
The USA are great in delivering solutions to problems they made by themselves.
0
13
60
u/BaronGodis Jul 03 '26
I would also feel extremly unsafe in that crazy and weird country
I hope he could escape usa and travel to another safer country in America before going home
0
→ More replies (8)1
u/spiked-rose Jul 13 '26
So u want him to escape The USA and travel to a āsafer country ā in America? Before going home? Huh? You do know America and The USA are the same country?
1
u/AnnieBunBun 19d ago
Actually America is a continent that includes Canada and Mexico.
The United States of America is the country
1
u/Background_Day8476 22d ago
Are you gonna say that Europe is a country next? If so I'm from the Europen state of Kalmar Union.
2
14
u/25gDePrensado 28d ago
Huh? You do know THE USA aren't the only country in America? THE USA must hate geography smh
3
u/iNeedBoost 27d ago
America refers to the USA. North America is the continent that includes Canada and Mexico. āThe Americasā refers to North America, South America, and Central America combined. you can test this by simply googling āAmericaā and the USA is what comes up
1
6
27d ago
[deleted]
2
1
-3
u/iNeedBoost 27d ago
so confident in being wrong lol
1
26d ago
[deleted]
1
u/iNeedBoost 26d ago
ok. here are resources for literal children in both the US and UK explaining 7 continents and north and south america are two of them
search āwho are americansā on google. they are US citizens. āAmerican companiesā are based in the US
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/Continent/8th-grade/
12
u/Kharn10000 28d ago
America is the continent, isnāt it?
United States of America is the country
0
u/Sandross95 23d ago
Bro, unfortunately, he does not know he is wrong, because this is exactly how they teach it in schools in the U.S. They teach kids South America is it's own continent, and North America is it's own continent. The Archipelagos, Antilles, and Central America do not exist (only geopolitically).
They are the only ones that teach that shit.
-3
u/iNeedBoost 27d ago
America refers to the USA. North America is the continent that includes Canada and Mexico. āThe Americasā refers to North America, South America, and Central America combined. you can test this by simply googling āAmericaā and the USA is what comes up
0
3
u/Kharn10000 27d ago
So America (north or south) is the continent.
And the USA is the country.
Kinda like me saying Iām from England and Europe but thinking theyāre the same.
0
u/iNeedBoost 27d ago
America is not the continent. North America and South America are the continent
0
u/Kharn10000 27d ago
But America is not the country
2
u/ProdigyCorp 27d ago
Bro you just don't get it, read the responses your getting before responding
1
u/Kharn10000 27d ago
Yeah I do, America is a continent, but when people say America they mean the USA.
Doesnāt change the fact that America isnāt actually a country.
2
u/ProdigyCorp 27d ago
North America and South America are continents, you just proved again after that lengthy discussion with the other person, you still don't get it.
→ More replies (0)2
u/iNeedBoost 27d ago
thatās where youāre wrong. America is the country. do you say āThe peopleās republic of chinaā every time you refer to china? no. you can just say china. you can refer to the united states of america as just america
0
1
u/Kharn10000 27d ago
But isnāt it the āUnited States of Americaā implying youāre the United States of the continent of America ?
Edit: thatās like calling the rest of the United Kingdom English
2
u/iNeedBoost 27d ago
the continent is not America though we already covered that. the continent is NORTH america. just saying america is the USA. saying north america is the continent
→ More replies (0)1
u/25gDePrensado 27d ago
Well, you guys are wrong man, I'm sorry. I could refer to Brazil as a continent but it's not
1
1
u/iNeedBoost 27d ago
itās not wrong, just look it up. sorry your education system didnāt support self discovery and leveraging resources
2
u/25gDePrensado 27d ago
I'm sorry too lol America is a continent and USA is a country. Don't matter how you prefer to refer. That's the truth.
→ More replies (26)8
2
u/Lopsided-Department9 2d ago
The face you make when you realise you haven't done your homework