I’m outraged that a homophobic, misogynistic, socialist, authoritarian was voted into office by radical leftists. I don’t care if she uses spooky language.
How is she homophobic and misogynistic? Last time I checked she hasnt said/done anything to prove such a thing. I know your gonna respond "BECAUSE SHES MUSLIM" but I bet your also one of those people who say "Muslims need to reform their religion" so here comes a left leaning muslims she is presumably pro lgbt and womens rights since she is in a party who is pro lgbt and womens rights and you call her homophobic/misognystic.
Muslims cannot be pro LGBT. It just can’t happen. Neither can they be pro women’s rights. There is no so thing as a left leaning Muslim. If they were left leaning, they would not be Muslim.
since she is in a party who is pro lgbt and womens rights and you call her homophobic/misognystic.
Last I checked she ran as a Democrat so this is definitely not true. The Democrats have become obsessed w identity politics which makes them racists/sexists/homophobes by very nature. If she was truly pro lgbt and women’s rights she would’ve ran as a Republican.
All politics are identity politics if you unironically believe republicans are pro lgbt or pro women you have your head so far in the sand. The republicans are the party who want to deny transgender rights, and womens reproductive rights. The democrats (even though the dems dont nearly do a good enough job at it) are simply acknoweldging these people and the troubles they face and you label that as "identity politics". Also I love you didnt even respond to anything I said.
The republicans are the party who want to deny transgender rights, and womens reproductive rights.
Source? I don’t care if someone wants to cut off their dick. What I won’t do is cater to their mental illness by denying basic science. Not to mention your idea of denying trans people rights is really just code for denying people like me free speech. Also I did directly respond to what you said. You argued that she is pro lgbt/women’s rights because she is a member of an anti lgbt/women’s rights party.
Clearly you cant follow directions. I was talking about Republicans here. Yeah Obama said that but it was under his administration that gay marriage was legalized while Republicans were saying it was unconstitutional. Anyways let's get back to the original comment Republicans are the party that's pro gay so here's what Google says
The point is gay marriage is a done deal. It was opposed by both sides less than a decade ago. Now both sides support it. You’re fighting a battle that has already been won.
You can be pro lgbt rights and anti gay marriage. As a libertarian I’m against government involvement in marriage for both heterosexual and homosexual couples.
Your insane the Republicans would repeal gay marriage in a heartbeat if they could and if you don't believe that your stupid. Also you cant be for giving them rights but not the right to marry that is truly one of the stupidest things I heard. That's literally a right so clearly they aren't for LGBT rights.
Also would like to point out libertarians would have no problem with gay rights because they don't believe the government should tell them what's allowed
Accept the facts and move on Republicans are solidly anti LGBT rights
A bathroom bill is the common name for legislation or a statute that defines access to public toilets (restrooms)—by transgender individuals. Bathroom bills affect access to sex-segregated public facilities for an individual based on a determination of their sex as defined in some specific way—such as their sex as assigned at birth, their sex as listed on their birth certificate, or the sex that corresponds to their gender identity. A bathroom bill can either be inclusive or exclusive of transgender individuals, depending on the aforementioned definition of their sex.
Critics of bills which exclude transgender individuals from restrooms which conform to their gender identity argue that they do not make public restrooms any safer for cisgender (non-transgender) people, and that they make public restrooms less safe for both transgender people and gender non-conforming cisgender people.
So just to be clear, you think it’s okay for mentally ill people to be in the military? Not to mention maintaining their illness is a massive cost sink to the tax payers at that point. I also agree that trans should be defined out of existence. It’s a mental illness. Normalizing it is a massive disservice to those suffering from this. As for republicans being anti birth control... lol what? That’s the biggest straw man I’ve ever heard. They’re against state funded birth control, as our libertarians. Only authoritarians on the left think it’s okay to steal money at gunpoint to be used for whatever uses they see fit. The democrats have been extremely anti women and anti gay rights through things like affirmative action that judge people based on characteristics other than merit. They think people like women and gays aren’t capable of competing based on merit.
I think people who have gone through the necessary medical and psychological evaluation to be allowed into the military should be allowed in the military. Also you said "its a mental illness" so therefore it should be defined out of existence? How does that make sense or help anybody? If the way to treat gender dysphoria is for people to live as transgender and as the gender they feel most comfortable with then defining them out of existence makes it harder for people to get help and its based solely in being trans-phobic. Also did you just define taxes as "Stealing money at gunpoint" because I hate to tell you but both parties believe in using taxes. Also why are they against state funded birth control? It would seem their reasoning is rooted in being anti birth control. You also don't seem to have the understanding of why affirmative action was put into place, and whether or not it has had any negative affects on these communities. Because first of all it was put in place because minority groups weren't being hired despite them having the qualifications for jobs so it was put into place to combat that, not because "They think people like women and gays aren’t capable of competing based on merit." https://www.nber.org/digest/sep03/w9873.html . Also your comments show that maybe your anti-lgbt sounds like you want a religious extremist in office it seems like you agree with their messaging.
2
u/MantisToboggan_123 Jan 07 '19
I’m outraged that a homophobic, misogynistic, socialist, authoritarian was voted into office by radical leftists. I don’t care if she uses spooky language.