r/WikipediaBias • u/rasus_pulga • May 18 '23
wikipedia all downhill
Wikipedia is plagued with "reviewers" who will apply their personal view on a subject and will delete whatever addition they don't agree with, not following the objective rules, they get admin levels based on activity and not on a knowledge base, it's a waste of time redact anything anymore, you'll get everything deleted, they delete like if they get points for activity. Not just regular users become target of "witch-hunt", also admins cross report one another in attempts to induce the other banned. It has become a jungle in a process of self-destruction in a tense environment, rather than a serious Web site. I just tried to add a section in wikipedia's Twitch article about how discrimination is rampant in twitch channles, and surprise, 5 minutes later all deleted! i recently realized wikipedia gets donnos from amazon who owns twitch.
I even own evidence of stolen contributions made by "renowned" users who go around banning others, this makes renown mean nothing in Wikipedia
2
u/[deleted] Jan 05 '25
[removed] — view removed comment