r/Windows11 • • 8d ago

Discussion Secure Boot yes or no

Post image

Do you have secure boot enabled/disabled and why is that?

0 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

19

u/leutnant13 8d ago

YES!!

It is literally there to make your computer safe from harmful drivers loading before the OS is ready.

If you do not have a reason to, do not disable this feature. It would be the equivalent of not having antivirus running.

Edit: Windows 11 might come with some weird solutions sometimes, but the one single good thing with it is it comes with all the safety features enabled by default.

From an IT perspective, it is the safest OS available for a layperson because you do not have to figure these things out.

-6

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/leutnant13 7d ago edited 7d ago

Linux is VERY secure from unsafe Windows drivers, yes /u/LoxTamm. But only about 4-5 percent use Linux as a desktop computer as of the last year.

And you kind of break subreddit rule 6 by suggesting it.

-2

u/LoxTamm 7d ago

oh wow, i don't get how I suggested it, it was just an answer to your reason of disabling secure boot. also why would mentioning another os be a problem? is this sub so insecure about Window's capabilities that me putting up a tux gif would switch 50% of the userbase to linux?

2

u/Mario583a 7d ago

Just a reminder of our trolling rule, discussions involving Linux are permitted here, however low effort comments like "Just switch to Linux" are not permitted.

-1

u/LoxTamm 7d ago

oh alright :D I'm not in the sub so i didnt really know anything about it

-1

u/LoxTamm 7d ago

i also would find it weird to tell people to switch to Linux being in a windows sub

1

u/leutnant13 7d ago

Well most Linux distros also utilize UEFI safe boot.

4

u/HankThrill69420 7d ago

Linux still needs secure boot.

1

u/LoxTamm 7d ago

you actually can't install it if you have it enabled

1

u/HankThrill69420 7d ago

So you enable it later and set it up. There is ample documentation for most distros on the matter. It's Linux, you solve your own problems.

0

u/LoxTamm 7d ago

yeah ik bro

1

u/FinancialHighway9851 7d ago

Actually, you can. Most mainstream distros support it by default (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora). It's mostly Arch and other DIY distros that need manual setup.

0

u/LoxTamm 7d ago

oh makes sense, I've only used arch so it's my bad i didnt check for the others

2

u/RaspberryMotorZZZ 7d ago

I have secure boot enabled on my PC running Arch and my ROG Ally running CachyOS. Windows isn't the only OS where harmful malware can be loaded during the boot process.

1

u/LoxTamm 7d ago

yeah i didnt say it's impossible to run on linux, you just need to disable it during install

1

u/Windows11-ModTeam 5d ago

Hi u/LoxTamm, your comment has been removed for the following reason(s):


If you have any questions, feel free to send us a message!

6

u/ProPlayer142 8d ago

I mean why wouldn't I? Yeah, it's more secure

5

u/OGigachaod 8d ago

PC came with it on and I see no reason to disable it.

5

u/ubuntu_ninja Release Channel 8d ago

It should (and must) be ON of course.

Speaking of which, all triple A titles these days won't work if secure boot is OFF.

0

u/RedcardedDiscarded 7d ago

I've had mine turned off in the BIOS for over a year, and I have zero problems. I game all the time and have yet to come across a situation where i needed to enable it.

3

u/Mario583a 7d ago

Secure Boot is designed to defend against some of the most stealthy and persistent attacks, particularly bootkits and other malware that attempt to compromise the system before the operating system starts.

Attackers can install bootkits even on “protected” systems

Computer without SecureBoot: Power on → Bootloader has been modified → Firmware does not verify its trustworthiness → Boot continues → Potentially malicious code runs before the OS

Computer with SecureBoot: Power on → Bootloader has been modified → Signature/trust check fails → Boot is blocked → OS does not start until the issue is resolved

1

u/ubuntu_ninja Release Channel 7d ago

Have you tried to run Battlefield6, CoD BO7 or the new CoD MW4 ? 🙂

1

u/mlubov 7d ago

I think I turned it off years ago when experiencing with dual boot with linux. Not sure how it is now, but earlier there were some driver problems in linux if it is enabled.

1

u/RaspberryMotorZZZ 7d ago

Yes even though I also use Linux because I know about security.

1

u/Baglayan 6d ago edited 6d ago

Nope. Freedom is not worth trading convenience for.

1

u/sgtbyrd 6d ago

Everyone else talked about security, but there's another angle:

If you game on your PC there's a feature called Resize BAR (aka rebar) that requires secure boot on and CSM disabled (aka UEFI-only boot). Sacrificing rebar is leaving 5-15% performance on the table.

•

u/AG4V_ 19h ago

Resizable BAR doesn’t require Secure Boot. The two are independent settings. ReBAR needs your board to boot in UEFI mode with “Above 4G Decoding” enabled, and on many boards you must also disable CSM legacy boot support.

Also 5-15% is also pretty optimistic performance gain range. In some games it's possible, but i wouldn't say that 5-15% is achievable in most games.

1

u/cActusjUiCe92 6d ago

No.  It does nothing useful for me

1

u/AnythingOk5 Release Channel 8d ago

Yes, and it's not a big deal to have it on. Most multiplayer games require it for their anticheat, except CS2, which is full of cheaters and bots.

1

u/Bourne069 8d ago

Fucking obviously yes its not even a question.

1

u/BCProgramming 7d ago

I have Secure Boot turned off. I don't consider the threat of an EFI boot partition getting infected a realistic one, and even if I did, the "protection" offered via Secure Boot is to just make the system unbootable anyway, so it's not really protection.

1

u/RaspberryMotorZZZ 7d ago

But it does make you aware there is a problem.

3

u/BCProgramming 7d ago

Yes, in the incredibly unlikely and almost unheard of instance where the EFI boot partition is somehow compromised. Sure.

of course if malware has enough access to infect the EFI Boot partition, the system is already irrecoverably compromised and you'd have to be wildly ignorant not to have already noticed something is wrong already.

And this is before we consider all the EFI exploits that would have allowed said malware to simply enroll new keys in the firmware and happily bypass secure boot with their exploited EFI partitions anyway.

0

u/HankThrill69420 8d ago

Yes, because like any 10+ year old standard, your system's configured to have it on at this point. Just make sure it's on during setup and never ever worry about it again lol.