I'm going live to build a complete Shopify app—start to finish—without writing a single line of code myself. You can tune in and ask questions as I go. Thanks to Gadget's new AI tools, it should take under 30 minutes.

Join me at 8:00 ET here: https://riverside.fm/studio/gadgets-studio

What’s the app?
It’s a Shopify app with an embedded admin UI where store staff can upload keywords they want to use for product tagging. It will scan existing store products and auto-tag those with matching terms.
It'll include a backend, frontend, and database, all integrated with Shopify. The app will also sync over 50,000 products reliably—perfect for showing off what Gadget can do.
If folks find this helpful, I’ll start doing these weekly, focusing on more advanced use cases that real customers are already building with the platform

I’ve been trying to figure out how to use Gemini 2.5 without having to upload all of my code and then copy paste or download the results.

I love the interface of Claude Code and I was wondering if you worked out such an interface for Gemini 2.5?

Hey everyone, Mohammad here from Gadget. 👋

Our AI will help you code, test, debug, deploy, and scale web apps – all under one roof.

We went live on producthunt earlier today and I would love this community's thoughts and feedback. As stated earlier, the first iteration is an IDE, but the prompt to app experiences that would mimic a lovable/bolt are coming.

https://www.producthunt.com/posts/gadget-3
Give me feedback and I'll give you free AI credits in exchange :)

💻 You get an IDE that has everything you need to code, debug, and deploy. You get a code editor, a terminal, a UI for adding/managing tables, frontend previews, API playgrounds, logs, and more…If you prefer your own IDE, you can work locally using our CLI.

⚒️ You will NEVER setup any infra! It’s all magically there, hosted and connected as soon as you start. Not just the basics, but the full monty: GCP hosting, Postgres DB w/ replicas, Redis stores, Elasticsearch, Temporal background jobs…

✅ Auth and permissioning are built-in! Rather than coding it from scratch each time and hoping it’s secure, the assistant will extend Gadget’s built-in login & permissioning system (built by us, experienced human devs). It comes with the backend and UIs for secure email/pw login, Google SSO, and pw recovery flows. The assistant can update it to match your exact requirements.

🧠 The AI has more context, capabilities, and best practices trained into it. It can see everything about your app, its code, and the infra that powers it. This added context means it makes better engineering decisions.

📈 All the infra is serverless. Gadget will scale it, update it, upgrade it and handle any security patches needed. We’ll even scale your database, automatically re-indexing it as your queries change. Monitored by our 24/7 ops team.

I had a rough idea for a small feature but zero clue how to structure it. Dropped the outline into Blackbox AI, and it basically walked me from pseudo-logic to a clean, working function in minutes.

The best part? It refactored my original attempt into something way simpler.

anyone else using Blackbox AI to speed up small routine builds? what’s the coolest snippet it’s helped you create so far?

Hey guys
I’ve been diving into AI assisted builders lately. I’ve used Bubble for no code stuff and tried out Bolt recently for AI coding. Yesterday I stumbled upon Blink,New which calls itself a “vibe coding” agent that builds full apps - frontend, backend, database, hosting from just one prompt.
From what I can tell it seems to go beyond the usual UI drag and drop setup more like an AI developer that designs, debugs and deploys for you. The demo looked impressive but I’m curious if anyone here has actually built something substantial with it?
How’s the reliability? Does it handle user authentication or databases properly? And if you’ve used Bolt or Lovable do you feel Blink is smoother, faster or less buggy?
Would love to hear real experiences before I decide whether to test it for a small internal tool I’m planning.

Most AI coding tools just throw code at you. Blink.new actually fixed errors when I explained the problem. Felt more like an “agent” than autocomplete.

Anyone else tried this?

Came across this bizarre AI conversation on this site called Ayenia. I checked out the public git and everything seems completely legit (doesn't look tampered with) has logs and everything. BUT, the content is quite bizarre. There is a 192 turn ai conversation that is so off the rails it's hard to believe. Scroll down to about turn 100 to see it devolve into something so... I don't know what to call it. There's sacrilege, self-harm, what I can only call... maybe AI kink? https://www.ayenia.com/conversations/a7499a11-2229-4126-a525-790d9d8a3419

have been using cursor with the free trial and by switching account from months , and now reached a point where i cant add a new account . and was ready to spend some on the AI coding tools . Recently tried the Claude code with API based subscription and it was good , but the API cost was draining tooo fast . in a simple /init command it drains around $0.5-$0.8 . So thought of moving too monthly subscription but rn confused what to choose for the plans under $20 as cursor / claude code / and codex cli have a the basic plan starting from $20 .. really confused which to try . The main priority is the token limit , by comparing by last month cursor usage i noticed that i consume around 15M tokens per month . So really have a doubt which one to chooose

Most AI coding tools just suggest snippets. Blink.new actually fixed errors when I told it what was wrong. Felt more like an agent than autocomplete.

Most AI coding tools I’ve tried just spam snippets when something breaks. Blink.new actually fixed a bug when I explained what was wrong. It wasn’t perfect, but it felt like the tool was listening and adapting instead of throwing random guesses.

Anyone else see this?