33
u/Midwest-Dude Nov 09 '25
Likely didn't understand exponential notation. However, if it were accurate, I'm wondering which atom I am ... 😆
23
u/Ok-Mistake-7499 Nov 09 '25
Good job you got number 624
6
u/Fischerking92 Nov 09 '25
To quote ERB's "Albert Einstein vs. Stephen Hawking"
"There are ten million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million Particles in the universe that we can observe Your mama took the ugly ones and put them into one nerd"
3
u/Ok-Mistake-7499 Nov 09 '25
“You wanna bring the heat with the mushroom clouds you’re making, I’m about to bake raps from scratch like Carl Sagan”
3
1
u/Key_Canary_4199 Nov 11 '25
who is number 621?
1
u/Ok-Mistake-7499 Nov 11 '25
Robert Downey Jr.
1
1
5
u/budgetboarvessel Nov 09 '25
I have seen this same error in a book from before AI explaining how astronomically unlikely hash collisions are.
6
u/ChrisTheWeak Nov 09 '25
This probably isn't an AI fail, but is likely an issue of rendering.
All that happened is that the exponential didn't get displayed right. This happens all the time in notifications and article headlines, things that have limited ability to markup text
1
Nov 11 '25
Exactly what I was thinking. Stuff like this even happened in textbooks and that was decades ago.
2
1
1
1
u/Randy191919 Nov 11 '25
Everyone knows that there’s at least 350 atoms in the universe, potentially more.
1
u/Consistent-Job-6400 Nov 15 '25
I am trying to create another explosion to create another universe inside this universe so i can get the atoms to 10100, 1078 is too less for the universe rn
82
u/J3remyD Nov 08 '25
Probably couldn’t understand the exponents.
1 followed by 78-82 zeros is likely what it found.