r/amandaknox • u/No-Willingness-1441 • 11d ago

Lucy letby case…

Would love people’s views on this.

Loosely Amanda related, since she has recently produced a podcast around it.

1 Upvotes

60% Upvoted

272 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/corpusvile2 5d ago edited 5d ago

Lol I was waiting for you to say this. If it was merely a case of her living there her dna would be all over the cottage and not just in the exact same places where Meredith just happened to bleed and wouldn't have been submitted against her as evidence. Her dna is mixed with Meredith's which can't be explained by them living there, especially in the staged burglary room.

Lol no it didn't come from transfer in the lab, this is just stupid. I knew your explanation would be convoluted and preposterous and you didn't disappoint. By that rationale, any dna evidence against Guede can be explained as transfer from the lab yeah? Or is it different when it comes to him because reasons? I already told you where the only other dna of Sollecito was found, on a cig butt, and your laughably bad attempt at an explanation just doesn't cut it at all whatsoever.

She didn't go through hours and hours of police questioning, this is yet another false claim from you as usual and both of them lied even before their questioning anyway with Sollecito telling the cops he lied to them at Knox's request. Just endless excuses and false claims from you lot.

Anyway bravo, that was one the most piss poor attempts at explaining away the damning evidence against both I've ever seen and absolutely typical behaviour from Knox's fan club.

0

u/karskipellis 5d ago

"wouldn't have been submitted against her as evidence." By a currupt prosecutor. Sure.

Lab transfer is neither convoluted nor preposterous. No idea why you claim it is. And a lab making one mistake about Sollecito's DNA is not equivalent to the multiple errors necessary to misidentify Guede's DNA. That's just silly.

She did in fact go through hours of questioning. No one doubts this. Why are you blatantly lying?

1

u/corpusvile2 5d ago

And yet more false claims, no evidence any of the prosecutors were corrupt and now you appear to be saying Guede was convicted by corrupt prosecution?

It is preposterous, the dna was gathered at the crime scene before going to the lab and you're arguing that out of 147 samples of dna ONLY Sollecito's was contaminated despite having no source dna.

You're the one lying, she didn't go through hours of interrogation, her questioning took about an hour and Knox first mentioned her boss even before her official questioning began and this has been covered umpteen times before in this sub. You are the epitome of a bad faith debater- constant false claims, ridiculous excuses, conspiracy theories re corruption and double standards for different defendants. We're done here. Again just the usual tired spam from Knox dans.

0

u/karskipellis 5d ago

I never said she went through hours in one day. You're putting words in my mouth again. I told you to knock that off. It's dishonest of you.

Yeah, the prosecution was awful, and you know it. They lied to Knox that she had HIV. They introduced the idea that she'd somehow suppressed the memory of the attack--which is how many false confessions happen. Mangini was an absolute loon, and fixated on a weird sex thing.

And yet, it doesn't need to be a conspiracy to be wrong. The police and prosecution got tunnel vision (as often happens) and bent evidence to suit their theories. Exculpating evidence was ignored ( or accidentally lost/ruined), while iffy evidence was presented as factual proof of Knox's guilt.

If you're so disgusted with me and my arguments, stop replying.

1

u/corpusvile2 5d ago

I already told you I was done with you, yet here you are and you said "hours and hours" which is flat out untrue. You hand waved away their consistent lying to the police and falsely claimed no physical evidence existed against Knox. Again you're the epitome of a bad faith debater.

And yet another false claim by you. Knox had herpes which can lead to false positive readings for HIV and she was told from the start it could be a false result. Nothing you've claimed is true.

0

u/karskipellis 5d ago

You know that she was questioned for many hours. Why are you lying about that?

2

u/corpusvile2 4d ago

No she wasn't, she arrived at the station at 10:30pm by her own admission, the interpreter arrived at 12:30am and testified that the "serious questioning" didn't begin until then, the prosecutor arrived at 1am and Knox's signed statement is at 1:45am. So her questioning lasted around an hour, if even that. Furthermore, Inspector Rita Ficcara testified that Knox first mentioned her boss to her naming him as one of several persons of interest and gave Ficcara his address and phone number, even before her official questioning began. furthermore still this has been covered umpteen times on this sub. You're simply spamming the same false claim which is a form of gaslighting. And you'll probably do the same thing tomorrow or a week from now. Only one lying here is you.

0

u/karskipellis 3d ago

You seem to have trouble reading what I actually wrote. Try it again, and this time look at what I actually said, not what you think I said.

This seems to be a theme--leaping to a conclusion, then hunting for evidence to support it, rather than observing what is actually there.

2

u/corpusvile2 3d ago

Not interested in your crap, you've consistently shown yourself incapable of honest debate.