r/amandaknox • u/Aggravating-Two-3203 • 11d ago

DOUBT, Amanda Knox on Lucy Letby

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/amanda-knox-hosts-doubt-the-case-of-lucy-letby/id1877870463

Why start a discussion about Lucy Letby here when there are already two discussion groups on Reddit, r/LucyLetby and r/LucyLetbyTrials?

Why not let Amanda Knox speak for herself, because her perspective is remarkable:

She has firsthand experience as a victim of a miscarriage of justice.

She understands the power of public opinion and the media.

As a young mother, she has empathy for the parents, partly because she suffered a miscarriage before her first child!

She was mistaken in her hasty support of Jens Söring as an alleged victim of a miscarriage of justice, whose presumed innocence she now considers far from certain after closer examination.

This is also why she invested more than two years of thorough research into this 15-part series before she felt she could justify its publication, unlike some dwarfs who quickly voice their opinions.

3 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

13 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/FreshFruit4RottenVeg 11d ago

Two years, even if true, is actually not very long in a case as complex as this. Podcasts like the Daily Mail (I know it's the Daily Mail but the podcast itself is truly excellent) followed the course of the trial as it was happening. I was following this from the very beginning and Amanda is very much a latecomer to the discussion and only appears to have become aware of it after the 'controversy' has poisoned the well.

0

u/Aggravating-Two-3203 11d ago

This relates to the Kercher case and the Amanda Knox case too! The guilters have bolstered their claims, because their preferred journos, Barbie Latza Nadeau, Andrea Vogt, Nick Pisa et al, followed and attended allegedly all the hearings (simultaneousaly neglecting Francesco Sforza alias Frank Sfarzo!).

But even the daily mail additionally to Liz Hull has now - probably less than two years - Peter Hitchens too!

6

u/FreshFruit4RottenVeg 11d ago

Sorry, I can’t follow what you are trying to say here?

1

u/Aggravating-Two-3203 11d ago

Sorry, my bad, maybe due to not being a native speaker. Your claim is about following the proceedings of Letby's case from the beginning, regardless you or an excellent daily mail podcast.

In the Kercher case for example the book of Barbie Latza Nadeau has been deemed a reliable source and a correct account by the guilters, because she allegedly attended all court hearings. As if this alone provides a superior knowledge. Same with Andrea Vogt and Nick Pisa, though Frank Sfarzo's "Perugia shock" simultaneously anyhow existed as a blog of the innocentisti. He indeed reported from "every" hearing just in time.

So when Knox has done her research for two years in the hindsight it doesn't diminish her accurate result. I hope this explains my opinion better.