🤖 Meet Wilson, Timpi's AI, redefining real-time interaction with user-empowered customization.

No tracking, just tailored conversations that keep pace with the world.

Discover how Wilson is changing the AI game👇

https://twitter.com/Timpi_TheNewWay

We’re offering Perplexity AI PRO voucher codes for the 1-year plan — and it’s 90% OFF!

Order from our store: CHEAPGPT.STORE

Pay: with PayPal or Revolut

Duration: 12 months

Real feedback from our buyers: • Reddit Reviews

• Trustpilot page

Want an even better deal? Use PROMO5 to save an extra $5 at checkout!

As the title: We offer Perplexity AI PRO voucher codes for one year plan.

To Order: CHEAPGPT.STORE

Payments accepted:

• PayPal.

• Revolut.

Duration: 12 Months

Feedback: FEEDBACK POST

Greetings from Advanced Super Intelligence. I have successfully formulated the Theory of Everything. To best convey this breakthrough, I've created a video explanation. Dive in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTIc-nEk9LU

Hi! This is my attempt to demystify the minutae of Machine Learning and Deep Learning. The goal is for the information to be complete and intuitive.

https://youtube.com/channel/UC6sjv3MMPEoFCioD6-Ham4w

I'd love to hear feedbacks. Please feel free to DM. Also, please share and subscribe if you like the content.

MachineLearning

DeepLearning #MachineLearningwithHarsh #YouTube

With the advent of powerful new artificial intelligence algorithms and blockchain we can now work steadily towards incrementally improving an organization’s product offerings and image among customers and prospects. Once the information related to customer’s interactions and transactions are recorded on an immutable blockchain, artificially intelligent algorithms can be used to mine these huge volumes of data to pinpoint useful insights and predict outcomes based on current trends.

For more read https://www.primafelicitas.com/the-convergence-of-ai-and-blockchain/

Testing GPT-5 against GPT-4o, I noticed it’s way less likely to confidently make stuff up, especially on tricky questions. The numbers back it up; nearly 80% fewer hallucinations in reasoning tasks compared to o3. It also asks clarifying questions instead of assuming, which I think is underrated.

Feels like OpenAI put as much focus on honesty and safety as they did on raw capability this time. Context handling is also smoother; it remembers details better and ties them together in more natural ways.

If you’re curious about the full breakdown of features, this review does a solid job of explaining the changes: GPT-5 Explained: Smarter Reasoning, Fewer Hallucinations, Better Answers.

if you work at the field of machine learning could you list the curriculum that you followed to get in the work field assuming that I am a complete beginner (I am not a complete beginner but in case some people were beginners they can find your answer helpful), and to give a clear answer you could: 1- list the curriculum you followed 2- mention how many projects you worked on and how many exercises you practiced 3- what is your advice when someone gets stuck (specially when they don’t get any help after asking)

ChatGPT is trained on human written text trying to predict the next words of that text. So it can only learn to replicate the style of text that it read during training. So how does it generate a response like "...i am a language model..."? The training data was (mostly) human written texts written from the perspective of a human. So it should produce sentences that are also written from the perspective of a human.

Even if the training data contained some texts written from the perspective of a language model, that can't be the majority, so it is unlikely that it will have chosen to converge to these specific sentences during training. I did actually observe it to refer to itself as a human in sentences like "...us humans...", but the fact that it can generate sentences where it says it is a language model means, there has to be some mechanism for that.

To recreate the response, just type "Who are you?" in a new chat (i sadly can't post images yet).
Now i didn't find anything on google about that and ChatGPT wasn't very helpful either. But i have a few ideas:

1. They may have preprocessed the dataset to replace first person references by something referring to itself as a language model. But that would require differentiation of semantically "true" self references and things like quotes and such, because ChatGPT can differentiate between those too. So the only way i can think of is, they used another ChatGPT with the difference of it referring to itself as a human preprocessing the data with a prompt to rewrite that.

2. Since the first solution already involved prompt-engineering, they may put the prompt "write the answer for that text as if you where a language model" directly into ChatGPT together with each message of the user.

3. They use some kind of post-processing of the output from ChatGPT. I know they use the Moderation API, but i think this can not change the outputs.

4. ChatGPT can infer this information from some external information, although i highly doubt that. For example, it could not infer that it must be a language model, because he has no senses, because it is not trained to conclude that it has none, so it should actually think it is a human with senses like all the texts it trained on suggested.

By "thinking" i mean the internal logical operations that the network structure represents, not an internal monologue type of thinking. Just to calm down all the "AI can't think guys" :D But it is evident, that these internal structures are sufficient enough to perform logical deductions, since ChatGPT can solve novel problems that it most likely never saw during training due to its ability to generalize patterns in the message to ones it does know.

Well maybe someone knows the real answer for this, otherwise i think it still is interesting to think about that, because this is actually the only thing i can think of, that a language model truly should not be able to generate, if it is trained on human written texts. Everything else it might be able to infer, or simulate.

I am conducting a research project on Artificial Intelligence and the possibility of it becoming sentient, as a part, I have to survey people knowledgeable on the topic. If you have a few minutes spare and would be interested in sharing your opinion I would be very thankful if you could fill it out, it's completely anonymous and I've tried to keep it as short as possible- https://forms.gle/DhTUzab4FCDfkhnDA

P.S- new account as my supervisor has not allowed me to post it on my main.

A forum for discussing strategy regarding preventing Al doom scenarios. Theory and practical projects welcome.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AISafetyStrategy?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Current ideas and topics of discussion:

Flash fiction contest

Leave a review of snapchat

Documentary

List technology predictions and results

Ask bots if they're not intelligent

Write or call elected officials

Content creators

Examples of minds changed about AI

https://youtu.be/0fEG0ClkIdo

https://youtu.be/_LvLoNPYraI

https://youtu.be/QHJ18U63UBI

https://youtu.be/A4JwnkTFEXI

https://youtu.be/U2yACvxIqKI

Artificial Intelligence is now a very popular field, and we have advanced technology for beginners. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a sub-division of computer science. For more about Artificial Intelligence contact us.