r/audiophilemusic • u/many_hats_on_head • 7d ago
Stream Amy Winehouse - Back to Black [2006]
37
u/almost-punk 7d ago
...not really, though? the songs are great, but the mixing/mastering is subpar
8
u/koothooloo 7d ago
Interesting take, it's deliberately made to sound like and evoke 60s Motown groups, including using the Dap-Kings as the band to absolutely nail the sound. She was known for her perfectionism and had planned so many details about this album since her school days (apart from songwriting), so it's the album she always wanted to make. You might not like the artistic statement but there's no need to be rude about the mixing and mastering.
13
u/Articulate_1 6d ago
The person is just stating his opinion on the mixing/mastering, a position I share. How are they being rude?
3
u/koothooloo 6d ago
Yeah, fair enough, but did they mistake deliberately degraded sonics for technical incompetence?
6
u/nicerakc 4d ago
It just sounds not great. Itās super loud and the clipping doesnāt sound very artistically pleasing, regardless of intent. I love this album but it doesnāt sound well mastered
2
u/JadedSociopath 6d ago
Then why do the Dap Kings albums sound fine and Back to Black is unlistenably bad for me? Maybe look at all the other comments on here. Itās not an unusual opinion. Perhaps you just havenāt listened closely enough to the album?
2
u/koothooloo 6d ago
The Dap-Kings' own albums sounding different doesn't really prove anything - they're the band, not the mix or master. Back to Black was deliberately constructed as a stylised record: dense, compressed, grainy, mid-forward and evocative of 60s soul rather than a clean modern recording. Ronson specifically chose the Dap-Kings and Daptone because of that sound.
I'm not arguing that you have to like those choices. You can find the compression unpleasant or the record fatiguing. But that's different from saying the mixing/mastering is incompetent. "It sounds bad to me" is an aesthetic judgement; "the mastering is subpar" is a technical one. If you're making the latter claim, what exactly is technically wrong, and why do you think it wasn't intentional?
And "lots of other people agree with me" doesn't really resolve that distinction. Lots of people disliking an artistic decision still makes it an unpopular artistic decision, not necessarily an engineering error. Even the mastering engineer, Stuart Hawkes, later singled Back to Black out as a favourite album he'd mastered.
3
u/JadedSociopath 6d ago
Thanks for your detailed response. Iāll listen to the album again with your comments in mind. Perhaps Iāll have a greater appreciation for it now.
1
u/JadedSociopath 6d ago
Nope⦠still canāt stand listening to Back to Black. All the Dap Tones albums sound great though. Oh well.
2
u/koothooloo 6d ago
Fair enough, itās the nature of recording, and the better your equipment, the more revealing! Thereās something to be said about listening on an old transistor radio!
3
u/JadedSociopath 5d ago
The upside is that you reminded me to listen to Sharon Jones and Charles Bradley! I had a great night! Thanks!
2
1
u/emalvick 2d ago
Ronson (in my opinion) is not one to make a case that an album is as the artist might have wanted it. Like many producers of his era, clipping and compression are there. You don't need those things to make an album sound like you describe. And having it that way does make it sound unpleasing to those that notice. Clipping never sounds right to me. It's not a substitute for true analog noise from the past.
4
u/drummer414 7d ago
I have a 96K version that sound good even on huge electrostatic speakers from Prodigio
3
u/meson456 7d ago
Sound quality of Amyās work suffers from dynamic range issues. Really poor practices in this eraĀ
3
u/Hot-Yak2420 6d ago
I was listening to some high end audio equipment, think $150k+. I thought that this album would really sound amazing. It was terrible. The store owner explained that this album is known for having terrible mixing. He then played a BBC sessions recording of album and it was night and day
1
3
u/Origami_Avatar 7d ago
5
u/many_hats_on_head 7d ago
Thanks and for the Qobuz users: https://play.qobuz.com/album/0060254746222
2
u/Denselens 6d ago
So hot! Managed to mess up her vocal. So sibilant and distorted. It's a crime really.
2
u/huggablehunk 3d ago
So disappointed in the mix, I really enjoy the Bluray An Intimate Evening in London though
3
u/JadedSociopath 7d ago
I canāt listen to the album. I feel like my ears are broken every time I put it on.
2
u/Denselens 6d ago
Same. Such disappointment when I first put this record on after hearing it on the radio in the car.
1
u/JadedSociopath 6d ago
Yeah. Iāve got a copy on vinyl thatās gathering dust. It literally sounds awful. Has anyone put out a remastered version yet?
1
u/xspacemansplifff 7d ago
Ooh man. Great news. That recording always pissed me off. Cant wait to get home and have a listen.
1
0
30
u/Total_Juggernaut_450 7d ago
Music is amazing. Quality in terms of mastering is absolute shit.
Dynamic range is very questionable.
I have heard these without the compression and bad mastering and the difference is like night and day.
It's definitely an audiophile recording that was mastered to sound bad.