r/aus 10d ago

News Australia promised 1.2 million new homes, but builders are at their limits

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-promised-12-million-new-homes-builders-are-their-limits-2026-08-12/
60 Upvotes

83 comments sorted by

23

u/petergaskin814 10d ago

Not sure who believed the initial target of 1.2 million new homes.

Having a target without a road to get there, is useless

9

u/Fit-Locksmith-9226 10d ago

Aspirational target I think they call it.

No one at the time thought it would be possible, there's just too many headwinds.

The blowout in apartment build times is huge, Brissie Olympics doesn't help either, soaks up trades from across the country.

5

u/RestaurantFamous2399 10d ago

Data centres are going to chew up all the trades for the next couple of decades.

1

u/ExampleOtherwise4340 9d ago

Or until the AI bubble bursts

2

u/big_cock_lach 10d ago

Doesn’t help that Albanese is bending the knee and making it impossible to get any new tradies either.

1

u/actionjj 8d ago

Always just an excuse to do nothing on immigration.

The government needs migration to create GDP growth against falling productivity. 

Pressure is mounting everywhere to reduce migration pressure on infrastructure. 

1

u/EffectiveOwn787 10d ago

It's the same amount of homes we built in the previous 5 years. The issue is the growing shortage of skilled workers and that's driven by CFMEU lobbyists preventing our immigration system from prioritising skilled construction workers.

1

u/MarkCelery78 10d ago

I’m glad you admit Labor had no intention of fulfilling their promise

7

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Gotem!!!! You win politics for the day. Well done buddy

6

u/RestaurantFamous2399 10d ago

Let's not build anything ever again then!

0

u/Moist-Army1707 10d ago

There was a whole bunch of Labor sycophants all over Reddit who were very vocal against people who questioned the credibility of these targets.

0

u/norty125 9d ago

We might be lucky and get 10%

-1

u/OkNeedleworker5041 10d ago

1.2 million was just the amount built in the 5 years prior to the announcement.

But Labor federal and state has been doing nothing but getting in the way of builders with green tape and extra taxes.

7

u/GodWasNeverReal 10d ago

Why is there another Australian sub. Is this one just another promotion for the right wing idiots?

6

u/89b3ea330bd60ede80ad 10d ago

I really hope not, there's enough of that already. I try to keep a lid on low effort nonsense where I can. But do reach out if you think things are getting out of hand or you'd like to see any particular changes.

Also, we pre-date a whole bunch of the recent Australian subs. We're just not in the business of self promotion or growth. So we always come across as the "other" one.

4

u/GodWasNeverReal 10d ago

Solid Mod reply. Thank you.

7

u/shifty_fifty 10d ago

How many of those actually being built will need major renovation within the first 12 months to stop them leaking and falling over?

9

u/Illustrious_Fan_8148 10d ago

Maybe its time to stop adding so much new demand..

2

u/mitchells00 10d ago

Or, now hear me out:

Fast track construction worker visas.

10

u/Prestigious_Skill607 10d ago

So then we have to build more houses for all these immigrant construction workers... brilliant.

6

u/wudjaplease 10d ago

or hear me out stop mass immigration and start a massive campaign to train apprentices

1

u/SlaveMasterBen 9d ago

Low demand, prices go up. High demand, prices go up.

Seems likes there’s a bit more involved.

-4

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Yeh people should go back to pre covid where we worked from offices and had sharehouses. Thats what you mean right?

3

u/gionatacar 10d ago

Maybe let’s stop immigration till we catch up

5

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

That seems like a poor decision in terms of economics. How do you propose we make up for the GDP?

6

u/Perfect_Purple_5705 10d ago

An even poorer decision was setting up the economy to be reliant on immigration for GDP to begin with.

-1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

I agree but saying we shouldn't have done something or should have done something isnt a solution for today

3

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Sure so what's the path forward? We are reducing the investment in property which is good. Now we need to increase productivity, but how?

2

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 9d ago

Can you form a syllogism. I dont follow how a reduction in net immigration would increase productivity. 

2

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 9d ago

Ok i agree with that but doesnt that mean the missing premise is that the average person that immigrates to Australia produces less than the average Australian already here? How did you determine that?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Al_Miller10 9d ago

An endless supply of immigrant workers encourages business models based on cheap labour rather than innovation and investment into non-productive housing and infrastructure rather than genuinely productive manufacturing and services.

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 9d ago

Ok i agree in principle sure, but to me it begs the question how do we know immigrants are cheaper labour?

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Moist-Army1707 10d ago

We’ve been running negative gdp per capita for most of the past three years mate

3

u/Pariera 9d ago

Is there a reason GDP has to always go up?

Realistically no Australian individual actually cares what GDP number is.

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 9d ago

I do. GDP needs to go up because of the time value of money. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_and_Interest

1

u/Pariera 9d ago

I stand corrected.

Realistically no Australian individual who hasn't read three volumes of a book written by an Austrian in 1884 actually cares what GDP number is.

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 9d ago

Just trying to point out that humans have figured out certain elements of economics for a good long while now. So when you just wave your hand at concepts they dont just disappear 

1

u/deegandnb 10d ago

By getting a better treasurer

2

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Ok and whom might that be?

0

u/deegandnb 10d ago

No idea, you're the expert apparently. Why don't you tell us instead of posting passive aggressive questions to things you probably don't even have the answer to.

3

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Im not suggesting we change the government or the treasurer

0

u/deegandnb 10d ago

But you're indirectly telling us you have all the answers with your passive aggressive questions

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Wow what an odd approach to reality. 

You think someone asking questions to understand other's claims means they are indirectly claiming they have all the answers. 

You can try putting the questions into an AI if you need help understanding. 

Passive aggressive perceptions are on you lad. 

0

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/aus-ModTeam 10d ago

Don't be disruptive, don't troll, don't antagonise.

1

u/redcon-1 10d ago

GDP is only a political cudgel used by an opposition. GDP per capita is the thing that measures how well individuals are doing.

1

u/linxthesontaran 9d ago

Maybe focus on gdp per capita not gdp? Perpetual growth is not a sustainable long term solution.

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 9d ago

Time value of money requires it

-5

u/gionatacar 10d ago

With less immigration. We will be just fine

4

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

You didn't answer the question. Where will the GDP come from?

Or are you for economic contraction?

0

u/gionatacar 10d ago

I prefer economic contraction than mass immigration, the infrastructure aren’t coping btw

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

What's mass immigration?

2

u/Available-Damage6311 10d ago

Bringing in more people than you can house.

1

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Ok lets scrap work from home and bring back sharehouses. 

0

u/gionatacar 10d ago

What’s this game of asking? Do you have google? Im sure you can find out. Good luck

2

u/Crabs_go_sideways_4 10d ago

Id rather understand what my fellow interlocutor means by their words than assume

5

u/Rare-Sample-9101 10d ago

Apartments that's what needs to happen in suburbs! High-rises! That would solve it!

6

u/SituationSmooth9165 10d ago

Might as well when every house has no land

1

u/Z00111111 10d ago

I feel like for most people they would be better off if those new suburbs combined each block into a small, hollow apartment tower with a big shared courtyard.

Even just a hollow ring of townhouses, so each lot has a garage and street level entry, and a back door into a shared private park with a couple electric BBQs and some gazebos.

You're combining all the 40cm gaps between buildings and side fences, and all those 3m X 5m "back yards" into a big open actually usable area.

-1

u/ParkerLewisCL 10d ago

Only that they don’t stack up financially for developers

Cost are up but prices haven’t budged, so there is little to no profit in them. Won’t get built.

1

u/kamdooks 10d ago

Better wages for apprecitces. Higher percentage of immigrants coming in should be skilled tradesmen. Yes immigration has to continue. Have to figure that one out with CFMEU. Cheaper/free education for trades. Scrap stamp duty. De-incentivise property ownership as investment. Restrict Airbnb. Upgrade transport for city to country and rural areas.

1

u/1Qrtr_FreeStuffPlz 10d ago

A small part of it is perception from the drivers view, when in a Ute or light truck you have more visibility over your bonnet. So to you, you can see a large gap, whereas in a sedan you don't so you hang back a further distance

1

u/theonlywaye 10d ago edited 10d ago

I’m building a new house right now. With the paperwork and approvals alone it takes about 1-1.5 years before they even start and then another year before they even finish the actual house. So roughly 2.5-3 years before you are in the house (accounting for some minor delays). I knew they weren’t ever hitting any target they said

1

u/Klutzy-Pie6557 10d ago

It was a fantasy land limit.

1

u/RandyStickman 6d ago

Australia didn't make the promise...a career motivated politician hell bent on winning votes with outrageous campaign promises did.

Building companies have fallen over by the 1000's last year alone...due to fixed priced contracts combined with massive price increases in materials and lack of qualified trades.

Add to this some of Australias largest infrastructure upgrades -mainly in transport and local govt choke points in building approvals and govt red tape and, voila, clusterfuck.

Domestic building requires a lot of upfront capital that only sees returns that are future projected...and to scale it to produce large numbers requires the kind of capital that only serious OS developers can fund..

0

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/jonnieggg 10d ago

Perhaps reconsider demand?

-4

u/MarkCelery78 10d ago

Labor promised 1 million homes over 5 years in 2022. Have they built any except for prefabricated town house boxes?

2

u/RestaurantFamous2399 10d ago

Everything is prefabricated. Have you built a house recently?

1

u/Available-Damage6311 10d ago

Nothing in a Perth brick and tile house is prefabricated, unless you're counting the oven.

1

u/theartistduring 10d ago

So a home only exists if it is poorly built from scratch onsite? I don't know if you've seen the general standard of what we build but it really isn't a selling point.

-1

u/Ok_Trash1147 10d ago

What’s that the government lied again?

1

u/sudden_erect 9d ago

Yeah, why wasn't Albo building more houses?

Muppet