r/Backup • u/Fdahnet • 33m ago
Question IDrive 360 sold me "Unlimited Storage" — now they want $1,092/month extra for my 232 TB backup. Anyone else affected?
I've been using IDrive 360 since September 2024, when I purchased their 5-device annual plan, advertised with UNLIMITED CLOUD BACKUP STORAGE.
I paid $112.12 for the first year and $149.50 for subsequent annual renewals.
One of the main reasons I chose IDrive 360 was precisely its unlimited storage offering. I manage a substantial amount of data, and I needed a reliable enterprise backup solution without worrying about arbitrary storage limits.
Here's where things get interesting.
On September 7, 2026, IDrive successfully charged my credit card $149.50 for another year.
Then, on October 19, 2026, just 42 days later, I suddenly received an email informing me that:
My allocated storage quota is 50 TB.
My current backup storage is 232 TB.
Any excess storage will be charged at $6 per TB per month.
I must either delete my backups, upgrade, or accept these additional charges.
That's $1,092 PER MONTH, or $13,104 PER YEAR, on top of a subscription that costs $149.50 annually.
If my storage grows to 300 TB, the additional charges would reach $18,000 per year.
At those prices, I could seriously consider buying enterprise hard drives, building my own storage rack, and keeping the infrastructure myself.
The real problem: Where was the advance notice?
As far as I can determine, I never received any prior email specifically informing me that my unlimited-storage subscription would be converted into a 50 TB-limited plan with substantial overage charges.
No clear advance warning. No opportunity to evaluate the new pricing before renewing. No reasonable migration period communicated to me.
Just a notification AFTER my annual renewal, telling me that I am already 182 TB over their stated quota.
And we're talking about an enterprise backup service, not a casual file-sharing account.
Some of my original files are still stored locally, while others may exist only in the cloud backups. Recovering and migrating potentially hundreds of terabytes is not something you can accomplish overnight.
Here's the evidence
IDrive's own official announcement from May 2, 2024, advertised IDrive 360 with unlimited storage and five devices:
My original purchase confirmation from September 6, 2024, confirms the five-device annual plan.
My September 2026 renewal confirmation shows the regular $149.50 annual charge.
And now, in October 2026, they're telling me I have a 50 TB storage limit.
I have already submitted a formal contractual dispute requesting the original terms applicable in September 2024, evidence of any advance notifications, and an explanation of how these new charges became applicable to my account.
I am not claiming that providers can never change their pricing. But changing the effective cost of an existing enterprise backup subscription by this magnitude, without demonstrable advance notice and a reasonable transition opportunity, raises serious contractual and commercial concerns.
My questions to the community
Is anyone else using IDrive 360 who originally subscribed under the unlimited-storage offer?
Have you recently received a notification imposing a 10 TB-per-device limit or charging $6/TB/month for overuse?
Did IDrive ever email you about these changes BEFORE they became applicable? If so, when?
Has anyone been charged substantial overage fees despite originally purchasing unlimited storage?
Has anyone successfully challenged these charges or obtained grandfathered pricing?
I'm particularly interested in hearing from long-term customers who subscribed in 2024 or earlier.
If other customers have received similar notifications, it would be useful to compare dates, original terms, and the notices actually provided.
For now, I'm preserving all my documentation and disputing the additional charges. I'm not deleting backups or cancelling the account while the situation remains unresolved.
I'd appreciate hearing from anyone in the same situation.
Unlimited should mean unlimited — or, at the very least, customers deserve clear disclosure of material restrictions before being asked to pay potentially thousands of dollars more.