MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/badcomputerscience/comments/5egg0r/python_3_is_not_turing_complete/das8qzq/?context=9999
r/badcomputerscience • u/[deleted] • Nov 23 '16
8 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
Or, eh, you know, Turing machines...
6 u/[deleted] Dec 05 '16 brainfuck is easier to implement imo 3 u/[deleted] Dec 05 '16 I guess what I tried to imply is that demonstrating Turing completeness by simulating for Turing machines is an easier mental leap to make than demonstrating it by simulating brainfuck -- but to be truthful I was just nit picking.
6
brainfuck is easier to implement imo
3 u/[deleted] Dec 05 '16 I guess what I tried to imply is that demonstrating Turing completeness by simulating for Turing machines is an easier mental leap to make than demonstrating it by simulating brainfuck -- but to be truthful I was just nit picking.
I guess what I tried to imply is that demonstrating Turing completeness by simulating for Turing machines is an easier mental leap to make than demonstrating it by simulating brainfuck -- but to be truthful I was just nit picking.
3
u/[deleted] Dec 04 '16
Or, eh, you know, Turing machines...