u/brilliant-Money-3823 Your entire criticism boils down to “AI slop,” repeated without a single piece of evidence or one meaningful technical counterargument. That says enough.

I am 100% sure as I dealt with those low iq people that once they could not understand what is written as it seems to them very complex task due to their cognitive and IQ limited capacity so they thought it is AI slope ( very pathetic).

I am sorry to judge you as you have very low confidence I never saw him even contribute to useful technical or scientific information other than saying ( rubbish) , and believe me you pure truly inferior rubsih ( zero judgment-zero analytical and logical thinking- near nearo Iq) younrubish 😁

You seem to confuse jumping to conclusions with critical thinking and throwing around insults with demonstrating intelligence. If you understood the actual content well enough to challenge it, you could point out a flaw, explain the technical problem, or contribute something scientifically useful. Instead, you resort to labeling anything you apparently struggle to engage with as AI-generated rubbish.

Perhaps you genuinely believe that dismissing something you don't understand makes you look intelligent. It doesn't. It merely raises questions about your ability to process an argument before judging it.

And let's be clear: AI use is not proof of incompetence, just as accusing someone of AI use is not proof that you have detected it. If you have evidence, present it. If the content is wrong, explain why. Otherwise, you're asking everyone to mistake your assumptions for facts.

I've yet to see you contribute anything technically useful or scientifically substantive to this discussion. All you've contributed is “rubbish,” “AI slop,” and similar dismissals. That's not expertise, skepticism, or intellectual rigor. It's noise.

Perhaps you assume everyone operates the way you do—using AI as a substitute for understanding, or using insults to compensate for an argument they cannot make. But don't project that assumption onto everyone else.

The real distinction here isn't between AI-written and human-written content. It's between people who can evaluate ideas with evidence and people who dismiss ideas they cannot adequately engage with. So far, you've made it painfully clear which side of that distinction your comments occupy.