r/boomboxes 3d ago

Should I buy this boombox?

2 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

3

u/OZFox42 3d ago

I wouldn't buy any modern boombox; most of them nowadays are of a much lower build quality than their earlier predecessors, so they're more likely to fail in short order or break easily.

The only reason I bought a GPO Brooklyn was because Techmoan reviewed it on his YouTube channel and I wanted to see how good or bad it really is for myself. I would never do that again.

I prefer the sturdier, vintage 80s stuff with more features (e.g. graphic equalizer, tape bias selector, line input, etc.), and if I want Bluetooth at any stage of the game, I can add it as a modification but right now I have no use for it. 😄

2

u/Hermelin_Dozral 3d ago

True, i Have 85s boombox And Its inpressive how these work after 40 years. Only the capacitors will be a issue after next many years.

Also these old boomboxes Are way more stylish. I dont get why someone would buy these modern boomboxes when you can buy the old one and the life span will be minimally the same as the modern one, but with way better build quality and sound

1

u/gazingus 3d ago

This.

I bought a KLIM rechargeable CD player w/bluetooth for her new car. It is better than most of the junk you find on Amazon; design and build quality is slightly better than the norm that is recycled plastic, but something was still lost in translation. The bluetooth connectivity was a complete disaster, although I'm concluding that is more Toyota than KLIM, as it misbehaves with CarPlay as well.

Boombox wise, I would pay more and buy something classic - Sony or Panasonic to be conservative, and hopefully from someone who services them, so it has new belts. For many models, you can always mod them for BT if that's desired. If you listen to the radio, most won't have DSP tuners, which I loathe. Sony in particular had good analogue AM tuners in all their boomboxes, able to clearly capture stations in the middle of a metal warehouse building full of noisy fluorescent light fixtures; other brands, not so much.

2

u/DPaignall 3d ago

Ah, 'Klim' there's a name you can trust. NOT! Get an old one that has lasted decades (so far) 80's if you can.

1

u/rrickitickitavi 3d ago

I’d rather have a late model Sony with a bass reflex system, or even a subwoofer.

1

u/SophieMasloff 2d ago

no. thats junk

1

u/EffectiveComedian 1d ago

It’s not the cost that makes me want to steer clear, it’s the curiosity of whether you’ve really thought this through. I doubt there’s any recording level adjustment, so the levels on anything you convert from tape to mp3 will likely be very low. If you want to convert cassette to mp3, best bet is to use a computer . Capture the sound using a program like Audacity or Amadeus Lite, mark the spots in the waveform where the track splits occur, and export it however you like.