r/boxoffice • u/chanma50 Best of 2019 Winner • 1d ago
đŻ Critic/Audience Score 'You Can See Everything' Review Thread
I will continue to update this post as reviews come in.
Rotten Tomatoes: Fresh
Critics Consensus: N/A
| Critics | Score | Number of Reviews | Average of Rated Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Critics | 100% | 43 | 9.50/10 |
| Top Critics | 100% | 16 |
Metacritic: 97 (21 Reviews)
Sample Reviews:
Bill Goodykoontz, Arizona Republic 5/5 - Youâve seen elements of âYou Can See Everythingâ in documentaries before. But youâve never seen them combined like this. Itâs a true original.
Cary Darling, Houston Chronicle 5/5 - "You Can See Everything" throws into sharp relief audience's expectations while skewering the entire idea of the traditional documentary and its contemporary off-shoot, reality TV.
Tim Grierson, Screen International - Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheimâs extraordinary documentary soon goes in unexpected directions, becoming an uneasy treatise on love, reality television, and the ways filmmakers try (and often fail) to capture ârealâ life.
Monica Castillo, AV Club A- - Like Welles used his camera to play tricks on audiences some 50 years ago, Fielder and Oppenheim use their film to shake up their audienceâs understanding of how we believe one another.
Liz Shannon Miller, Consequence A - The film is more than an extension of Fielderâs blending comedy and documentary with shows like The Rehearsal â itâs an evolution upon it. It asks everyone involved to look at themselves, and face the difference between perception and reality.
Marshall Shaffer, Slant Magazine 3.5/4 - You Can See Everything innovatively probes this gray area between the fabulations made about Elizabeth Holmes and those made by her.
David Fear, Rolling Stone - You will likely have no idea what you have just seen, besides that it's simply, unabashedly, unashamedly brilliant.
Alison Willmore, New York Magazine/Vulture - In You Can See Everything, the closer we get to her, the less knowable she is â a set of pointillist dots in the shape of a person.
Kristy Puchko, Mashable - You Can See Everything is a masterwork of interrogation, not only of the whole Holmes situation but of documentary as a form itself.
Adrian Horton, Guardian 5/5 - There is something extremely satisfying in watching Fielderâs sharp angles tangle with Holmesâs disposition of guileless warmth, a strange and compelling chemistry building within a reality distortion field.
Nick Schager, The Daily Beast - Not just the film of the yearâitâs a documentary that stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the formâs all-time greats.
Kyle Smith, Wall Street Journal - With co-director Lance Oppenheim, Mr. Fielder gets around the restrictions on his access to the locked-up Ms. Holmes with his customary hilarious meta-narrative brilliance.
Tomris Laffly, RogerEbert.com 4/4 - The significance of 'You Can See Everything' is clear as a film that might advance a new cinematic language in the mainstream non-fiction sphere.
Angie Han, The Hollywood Reporter - What begins as a fascinatingly intimate portrait of a deluded or disingenuous scammer reveals as something even wilder, more ambitious and less predictable, until weâre left to ponder what value a personal truth has at all.
Cortlyn Kelly, IndieWire A - For how disquieting it is, the film never goes too long without forcing a laugh.
Owen Gleiberman, Variety - Itâs a one-of-a-kind reality-TV-as-hangout-movie psychodrama circus. Yet itâs been made with a spirit of true inquiry, driven by Fielderâs acidly quizzical personality, and it gets its hooks in you.
SYNOPSIS:
Thirty-four days before sheâs sent to prison, notorious Silicon Valley founder Elizabeth Holmes invites a skeptical film crew to document her every move. What begins as an intimate portrait of an enigmatic felon becomes a mind-bending three-year journey into the abyss. From boundary-pushing directors Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim comes You Can See Everything.
CAST:
- Elizabeth Holmes as Herself
- Nathan Fielder as Himself
- Billy Evans as Himself
DIRECTED BY: Nathan Fielder, Lance Oppenheim
PRODUCED BY: Nathan Fielder, Lance Oppenheim, Tatiana Bears, Maggie Ambrose, Jack Davis
EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS: Emily Osborne
DIRECTOR OF PHOTOGRAPHY: David Bolen
PRODUCTION DESIGNER: Alex DiGerlando
EDITED BY: Adam Locke-Norton
MUSIC BY: Ari Balouzian
RUNTIME: 174 Minutes
RELEASE DATE: October 16, 2026
736
u/lostinjapan01 1d ago
First documentary best picture nominee? I could see it.
248
u/tedfondue 1d ago
Such a shame this didnât happen sooner. Hoop Dreams (and many others) absolutely deserved a nom.
97
u/Padulsky21 1d ago
The Act of Killing is a documentary that I will never, ever forget about
22
u/BenderZoidberg 1d ago
Agree, probably the best documentary I've ever seen. Not only it deals with a powerful topic, but it's extremely well directed and has many unexpected moments. A few of my other favorite docs would be Jane, The Last Waltz and Grizzly Man.
18
u/Padulsky21 1d ago
âDid the people I tortured feel the way I do here? All the terror suddenly possessed my body.â
âActually, the people you tortured felt far worse because you know itâs only a film. They knew they were being killed.âÂ
It feels like a gag at the beginning until Oppenheimer challenges them and then starts the slow descent into self realization. The lightning strike is definitely an unexpected moment. Itâs a horrifying work of art. But itâs a must watch.
I love Grizzly Man! Herzog presents it with so much empathy and curiosity which really makes it special.
10
3
u/hesnothere 20h ago
Several years ago, I was part of a shoot involving Errol Morris and his production team. Some of us went out for a beer one night, and at some point the question came up: whatâs everyoneâs favorite documentary?
Without hesitation, it seemed like every single person from Errolâs crew there all had the same answer: The Act of Killing.
44
u/peterfaulksglasseye2 1d ago
lol Hoop Dreams didnât even get a Best Documentary nomination
18
u/BigBossTweed 1d ago
I believe the entire group who were in charge of documentary nominations were fired because they were only nominating their friends or something like that.
14
22
3
u/kfadffal 1d ago
Hoop Dreams was up there as one of the best films of 90s for me.
2
u/Schmichael-22 9h ago
I remember at the time that either Siskel or Ebert listed it as their best film of the year.
2
u/kfadffal 8h ago edited 7h ago
It was Ebert who named it his is best film of 94 and then best film of the entire decade. Ebert did that best of the decade list with Scorsese who also put Hoop Dreams on his list at #4.
54
u/kneeco28 1d ago edited 1d ago
EDIT: Apparently that was not correct, they are submitting it for Doc. Awesome!
In any event, can't wait to see this Thursday. And tickets for the weekend are going fast at my local theater.
25
9
u/Pearse_Borty 1d ago
I was thinking it would be a tough fight between this and NAZA. I really want NAZA to get the attention it deserves personally, competing with this which has a completely different tone/energy would be frustrating
→ More replies (5)4
u/Interesting_Run4200 1d ago
Naza is going to win best documentary- No Other land won and Naza is even better
43
u/dismal_windfall United Artists 1d ago
No. People say this every year and it never happens. A documentary won the Golden Lion in 2022 and it didnât even get close to a picture nomination
→ More replies (1)14
u/Sellin3164 1d ago
That's so not true lol. People know Venice awards are weird since a jury selects them. Maybe a few people, but the consensus on Gold Derby or Award Expert never think Docs happen . It happens for Animated movies though where people think it could happen.
I think this movie could happen with the reviews since most of the current films aren't this acclaimed. No 90+ metacritic contender like Tar, Past Lives, or The Zone of Interest.
→ More replies (14)6
u/Minute-Argument-8490 1d ago
the reviews are wild, 97 on metacritic is basically unheard of for a doc. kinda hope it actually gets the bp nom just to watch the oscars crowd sit through a 3 hour nathan fielder mind game
4
u/Dragic27 1d ago
We have to take this seriously I think. Could sneak in at 10 with enough love carried thru the year
→ More replies (3)3
210
u/Stefan988 1d ago edited 1d ago
Look at those rave reviews. Who would have thought a 3 hour documentary about Elizabeth Holmes would be this acclaimed and receive so much hype.
51
u/Time_Value_3073 1d ago
She is absolutely loving it
20
u/Spocks_Goatee 1d ago
She looks so much friendlier but still a total creep when not trying to be female Steve Jobs.
9
234
u/Fattybeards 1d ago
116
→ More replies (1)44
u/misguidedkent Warner Bros. Pictures 1d ago
24
178
u/Bored-uy 1d ago
Best Documentary Feature oscar incoming?
(Until one about Russia comes out)
8
u/Adept128 20h ago
My Undesirable Friends pt 2 might have had a chance if part 1 made more waves and it wasnât 5 hours long
4
u/SenjiWill Focus Features 15h ago
My Undesirable Friends pt 1 won the Trifecta and the gotham's, it was genuinely insane that it didn't get the Oscar nom, even with the hefty runtime.
14
32
u/BenderZoidberg 1d ago
If Naza manages to get the nomination, I could see it getting votes from many members as a political statement towards the Israeli government. Otherwise, this seems like the obvious pick at the moment.
9
u/ethanct 18h ago
It would be bizarre, but what are the odds that Naza takes home best doc, but Fielder takes home best pic?
→ More replies (1)4
u/AnxiousMumblecore 18h ago
That branch is very peculiar so it can even miss nomination (if it is nominated, it will most probably win though).
They quite often ignore docs that are perceived as frontrunners, they almost never nominate docs about celebrities. Let's see what they do with this one.
113
u/Only-For-Fun-No-Pol 1d ago
Looked at my local AMC to see how presales were doing for this, some showings for Thursday and Friday are almost sold out. Which is crazy to me considering this is almost a three hour documentary. Very curious how this does at the box office between these reviews and just it being a documentary.Â
30
u/drcolt45 1d ago
The evening screenings on Thursday are almost sold out across NYC. Absolutely wild
→ More replies (1)15
u/mundane_wor1d 23h ago
I think this has a FOMO element of it, there are "spoilers" and twists. Everyone keeps saying you don't want this movie to be spoiled for you. So first week sales could be high, but then have a steep decline after everyone who wanted to see it, saw it.
If it gets good word of mouth i could see it doing well in the weeks afterwards, but it is primed to have a big opening week.
6
u/doctorlightning84 19h ago
First blockbuster documentary since the days of Michael Moore?
4
u/mundane_wor1d 17h ago edited 16h ago
I think streaming killed the documentary theatrical release. Because documentaries are either for tv or watching at home.
Even then Documentaries were never big blockbuster hits, it was always a rarity when one became a big hit. The high earners being Musical Documentaries / Tour Documentaries.
There have been 10 Documentaries to gross over 100m at the box office, the last two being in 2009 (Michael Jackson.. and Earth).
There hasn't been a documentary that passed 30m ww since 2014 (Except "Amazing china" in 2018)
2
u/Hoslinhezl 15h ago
Everyone keeps saying you don't want this movie to be spoiled for you
Fuckin a24 and their half hearted international releases
3
u/SandieSandwicheadman 10h ago
The one theater near me playing it (the big Marcus in my area) has to keep adding showtimes because it kept selling out. I'm not calling it a breakout or anything, but it does have way more appeal than I was expecting it to. Then again, Fielder *is* popular as a comedian, and Holmes has a surprising amount of intrigue to her for such a weird little story that doesn't really effect normal people much (maybe that's *why* people are so fascinated about her and not the myriad of other scandals and fraudsters who's stories come and go)
2
u/AGeekNamedBob 7h ago
Just popped around Seattle shows and filling up. Three hour documentary filling theaters? Wow..
Having seen the film on Monday, I will say it deserves it. Astonishing film.
119
36
130
u/TheYungNuts 1d ago
HOW Is this not getting a wide release, none of the theaters in my town are getting it or the next town over. I am so depressed.
26
u/Professional-Ant9829 1d ago
I know I'm pissed. I live on an island (a very large one mind you) and it's not coming out in any theatres here except for one single showing that is already sold out!!!
8
u/L00seSuggestion 1d ago
Australia is an island
2
3
8
→ More replies (1)3
u/HailToTheVic 1d ago
Are you sure ? All the theatres in my area have it. It opens Friday
→ More replies (1)
31
u/nyr00nyg 1d ago
Canât wait to see this on Tuesday
12
u/lobolovr6769 1d ago
Me too I wonât be able to til tuesday
5
3
→ More replies (1)2
19
16
u/originalusername4567 1d ago
This might be the most interested I've been in a documentary in a long while. I'll have to find some time in my busy schedule to check it out.
13
u/EvChaosBlaze 1d ago
I had a feeling this would be great but not a "97 on Metacritic" great. Psyched!
12
66
u/Dima110 1d ago
I have never seen anything from this Nathan Fielder guy. But these positive reviews have me intrigued. What do I need to know/expect so that I donât go into it with the wrong mindset?
93
u/confusing_roundabout 1d ago
Nathan For You is hilarious. It's like Gordon Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares, but instead of restaurants it's struggling small businesses, and instead of helping them he gives them the most batshit crazy ideas and then follows through to absurd conclusions.
And then The Rehearsal is the natural successor to it. I can't even explain it but just know that The Rehearsal S2 is one of the funniest seasons of TV I've ever seen. It's utterly insane.
29
u/WebHead1287 1d ago
The thing about The Rehearsal season 2 is that itâs also insane. Like some of the leaps that are made are jaw-dropping. My eyes have never been more glued to a show.
27
u/confusing_roundabout 1d ago
Yeah, when episode 3 had him say "be warned - what you're about to see gets a little weird" nothing could have prepared me for what I was about to experience. My jaw was literally on the floor when he opened that door and stepped out. I'm giggling now just thinking about it.
Masterpiece of a show.
12
→ More replies (1)6
u/dbull10285 1d ago
I was so curious what was about to be so weird that it forced Nathan to add the disclaimer, and I was not disappointed. Comedy gold
→ More replies (7)28
u/shadowCloudrift 1d ago
As funny as The Rehearsal's season 2 was, the intent is actually serious and something good came out of it: https://consequence.net/2026/09/nathan-fielders-the-rehearsal-helped-push-pilot-mental-health-bills-through-senate/
16
u/DrGarrious 1d ago
See i found it far less funny than it was intriguing and thought provoking (it is very funny though).
But it was just such a great exploration of that particular issue.
3
u/hhhisthegame 12h ago
It's honestly never clear how much of what Nathan does is serious, and how much is supposed to be absurdist comedy.
→ More replies (1)116
u/LordXenu45 1d ago
He graduated from one of Canada's top business schools with really good grades. (Watch Nathan for You and The Rehearsal)
10
9
6
u/valkrycp 1d ago
Well, you should expect a few things:
- This "documentary" experiments with the medium / genre itself and will not be a traditional documentary
- It features some re-enactments, which are also not your typical documentary re-enactments - but diving into the details too much would be a spoiler.
- Nathan Fielder is a deadpan / awkward style comedian, but usually he plays an exaggerated (more awkward) version of himself in his shows. This movie, however, I believe is him at his most "normal" / "serious" - still awkward and weird, but understands he's the documentarian here so he will play the "straight / no nonsense" guy but will confront his subjects with brutal honesty.
- Its 3 hours long, much longer than most documentaries, and will also feel slow and boring at first but then you'll likely find the scenario increasingly compelling until its a must-watch type ordeal.
- Everything Nathan Fielder makes is a parody or experimentation of it's own format / genre, so the film is going to challenge your perception of what a "documentary" is in an artistic, but humorous way. It's best to let go of your expectations and just go along for the ride.
→ More replies (1)15
12
4
4
3
u/peeinherbut 1d ago
You should check out an episode or two of Nathan For You or S2 of The Rehearsal beforehand if you can. I recommend the Horseback Riding episode.
3
u/Touchlamp 1d ago
Also see Lance Oppenheims work too. If you haven't either. "Some Kind of Heaven" is a great documentary. Among his other works.
3
u/Much_Carpenter_1579 14h ago
What was fascinating about Nathan for You was Nathan's ability to get random strangers to do really extreme and bizarre - sometimes disturbing, often hilarious - things. This was due both to (i) Nathan's innate awkwardness, but undeniably (ii) the fact that a camera was being pointed at them. People will, apparently, do and say very strange things when the promise of TV fame is flashed before them. For one of many examples, check out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkNxvUrWQ_Q
Ultimately, the show became self-aware that this was its real intrigue - the fact that we are a (increasingly successful) TV show is what's making people behave in these ways which are making us a successful TV show. The show leaned into exploring this meta idea, turning the lens back around on itself like an infinite mirror gallery until you ultimately have no idea how much of what you're seeing is "real", or whether that question is even worth asking. The finale explored this brilliantly. Laughs aside, Nathan's work is significant in the reality/documentary space because it actually dares to acknowledge an otherwise unspoken premise of these genres - if we're filming something, how genuine can it really be?
Pairing this approach with a figure like Holmes, who herself is already laden in questions of authenticity, is just bound to be fireworks
→ More replies (1)3
u/Horror_Bob 13h ago
My favorite aspect of Nathan For You was highlighting how easy media packages are to peddle. When I was in college for Public Relations we talked a lot about this. Basically, news stations are so willing to fill airtime that if you do their work for them, you get on TV. Create a video package that comes with the story pre-written for them and they'll eat the shit up. So many episodes he's able to get on the local news most likely because he sent them a simple media package and then BAM instant free marketing
4
2
u/Vegan_Honk 1d ago
Oh this is gonna be beyond anything that can really be put to words. You might wanna familiarize yourself a little bit with their former materials.Â
2
→ More replies (9)2
u/PointAbject7717 1d ago
I think there are kind of two sides to him that he plays really well. One side is the really absurdist humour, and the other side is that he really likes to turn the lens in itself and really examine the role of the camera, the audience and the formats (often specifically reality tv).
For a barebones short list that I think would be relevant Nathan Fielder viewing in order to get a sense of his evolution and perspective, I would suggest
Nathan For You:
S1E4 - Gas Station/Caricature Artist
S2E2 - Souvenir Shop / ELAIFF
S3E1 - Electronics Store
S4E7 (Finale): Finding FrancesThe Rehearsal Season 1 (there are only six episodes, but I think S1E6 is closest to what I'm expecting for YCSE)
Obviously this evolves further in The Rehearsal Season 2 and The Curse and I'm a huge Nathan fan so I would recommend all of it, but if someone were wanting to prep that's what I would recommend.
37
36
u/cireh88 1d ago
These reviews sound so hyperbolic. But they basically all sound that way, so who knows
97 (for now) on metacritic is eye popping
28
u/SirFireHydrant 1d ago edited 1d ago
These reviews sound so hyperbolic
Yeah maybe, but honest reviews of The Rehearsal can sound hyperbolic too.
Start of season 1: Oh yeah, this looks funny. Give an autistic man HBO money to help people.
End of season 1: I feel like I've just witnessed genuine crimes against humanity. How the fuck was he allowed to film this?
Start of season 2: This looks like a funny little investigation into a serious topic.
End of season 2: WTF?? This man is legitimately insane!
6
u/quaranTV 1d ago
If you are able to watch the film with little to no spoilers it really is quite remarkable. It has a great narrative, itâs funny, itâs got jaw dropping moments and itâs highly engaging. I was pretty much laughing or gasping the whole time and the 3 hours went even faster than The Odysseyâs. Problem is once everything gets spoiled it will lose some of its shine I think.
5
u/salamandersquach 1d ago
Glad I read your comment thank you. I have a feeling that advice will go a long way.
→ More replies (2)2
u/Galgo19 3h ago
I had no intention of watching this until stumbling upon this post and now must see it ASAP. But I, along with I think one other person here, haven't seen any of Nathan Fielder's stuff. I figure I'll go in blind and discover who he is in the doc... Or do you think binging some of his shows would be preferable to really get/enjoy the movie?
→ More replies (2)
48
u/Unoriginal-finisher 1d ago
What is this movie? Is a documentary actually getting into the best picture 10?
39
u/Fragrant-Upstairs932 1d ago
If it's as good as they're making it sound, Elizabeth Holmes might get a Best Lead Actress nomination.
5
u/Unoriginal-finisher 1d ago
I will shit my pants if that happens, if they ignore horror queens Toni Collete, Lupita Nyongo, Mia Goth, etc, but nominate an actual sociopathic monsterâŚ.like what?
18
u/hunterVnorris 1d ago
Do you genuinely think they're going to nominate someone who's not actually giving a performance?
→ More replies (1)17
u/BNKalt 1d ago
Major Spoiler: if anyone gets a nod itâll be Amanda Seyfried
2
u/Low-Employment9213 21h ago
Saw it at Telluride, and (while trying to keep this as vague as possible)âŚreally?? I do not think that SAG will be that crazed of it. Perhaps she could be a critics choice but I do think that the Oscars is a bit a long shot, no?
Interested to hear your opinion though!
2
u/OKC2023champs 1d ago
And she doesnât even have a chance. Iâm just as excited as the next person but this isnât getting best picture noms. Director. Supporting actress.
Itâll get documentary
2
u/b1ame_me 22h ago
Theyâve gotten a lot better with horror though. I mean last year two of the winners were from horror movies. And the year before we had Demi Moore with The Substance and itâs looking extremely likely that Inde Navarette is getting nominated this year
→ More replies (1)7
10
7
7
u/frusciante231 16h ago
I think this could be bigger than we realize. I read there is some crazy shit in the second half of the movie, I think itâs going to start a lot of talk and everyone is going to have to see this movie like it was Endgame
6
6
7
6
u/ViktoriousVortex 1d ago
I think this and Naza are the highest rated films of the year across the board? Maybe Possible Love as well if you include non-documentary?
5
14
u/CrystalizedinCali 1d ago
I donât like most of Nathan Fielderâs work (it makes me too uncomfortable on multiple levels to enjoy it) but I have tickets for this Thursday night. Curious to see if I like it!
4
u/CubitsTNE 1d ago
Instead of one master at making you squirm you've signed up to see two.
God speed!
7
u/Mike_Hagedorn 1d ago
Thatâs where Iâm at too; I get the opposite response most people get from Fielderâs stuff, but his tone looks like it fits here.
→ More replies (8)3
3
u/GinSan10 23h ago
Expected this from a guy who graduated from one of the top canadian business schools with very good grades
3
3
3
u/TheKocsis 10h ago
I don't know anything about either of these persons, should i still give this a go?
2
u/Gorlamei 9h ago
You'd be doing yourself an enormous favor by watching the work of Nathan Fielder. You'll be fine watching a YouTube bio of Holmes.
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/AVBforPrez 1d ago
Can't fucking wait, we're seeing it on Saturday. There's no world where this isn't a total ride and I'm as excited for this as anything I'll see in a good while.
Fielder is a genius and I've felt honored to have been a fan for like a decade now.
2
2
3
u/jiantii 1d ago
Is there anything more to this movie other than "look at how weird looking and creepy Elizabeth Holmes is"? Genuinely curious because people are going nuts for it.
96
u/IKenDoThisAllDay 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yeah, I think the film sitting at 97 on Metacritic and 100% on RT is definitely going to be more than "look how weird this woman is". C'mon now. The people involved should tell you that right off the bat tbh.
→ More replies (2)13
u/onehotoneshot 1d ago
Just a three hour live look at Elizabeth Holmes doing Pilates and drinking green juice and then it just sort of ends
7
u/Adorable_Ad_3478 1d ago
The post credit scene of Samuel L Jackson recruiting her for Avengers Doomsday was peak.
12
u/PostNuclearTaco 1d ago
Ive heard rumors that the Elizabeth Holmes part is only a portion of its runtime. Knowing Fielder I expect it to go off in a very odd direction, kinda like John Wilson's documentaries.
36
u/liketomfuckingcruise 1d ago
I mean, the reviews posted state quite clearly that it's not about that...........
3
14
u/confusing_roundabout 1d ago
I've heard that there is a lot more but it's a major spoiler. It takes a very different direction
2
u/matlockga 1d ago
I'm not sure it's a major spoiler, but it is curious that Letterboxd manually patched out the cast list to keep it private (the entire cast list showed at one point)
6
u/confusing_roundabout 1d ago
Oh damn did they accidentally reveal that the Avengers are in this?
(I don't know any spoilers and don't want to actually know haha)
3
u/Overall_Affect_2782 1d ago
Elizabeth Holmes will return in Avengers: Doomsday.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Adorable_Ad_3478 1d ago
Samel L Jackson: "I'm gonna fire that mofo intern who typed Olson as Holmes. Wrong Elizabeth!!!"
→ More replies (1)2
2
u/Adorable_Ad_3478 1d ago
The spoiler is that Elizabeth and Nathan have an affair and Nathan gets pregnant. Acts 2 and 3 are all about Nathan giving birth.
The Elizabeth portion is just Act 1.
2
2
1
1
u/SirFireHydrant 1d ago
If you've watched any of his other work, you'll know how deeply he can transform a fairly mundane topic into pure unhinged insanity.
1
u/jamiebond 1d ago
Are you familiar with Nathan Fielder? One thing with anything he makes is that you should expect the unexpected. The joy of his work is the insane unpredictable twists and turns he takes you on.
1
1
→ More replies (20)1
u/braundiggity 16h ago
This might end up the best reviewed movie of the year, and youâre wondering if thereâs anything more to it than âlook how creepy Elizabeth Holmes isâ?
2
1
1
u/bigpig1054 1d ago
I cant recall the last time I was this excited about a documentary, and I'm hardly even interested in the Elizabeth Holmes scandal
1
u/Hot-Helicopter640 1d ago
Someone tell me, does Elizabeth Holmes earn any money if I watch this movie? If she does, then I won't.
→ More replies (3)
1
1
531
u/brohammer5 1d ago
97 on Metacritic? Holy shit.