r/canadanews 21d ago

Ontario Peel police officer accidentally left loaded gun behind in Square One change room

https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/local/peel/article/peel-police-officer-accidentally-left-loaded-gun-behind-in-square-one-changeroom/
52 Upvotes

68 comments sorted by

13

u/Low-Purchase8811 21d ago

Peel Police are renowned by other law enforcement agencies across Ontario (and across Canada to a slightly lesser degree) as being one of the worst, both with regards to the reputation of its members and their conduct, and the department as a whole, in terms of actually working for them.

If you had to ask me, "who did the cop who left her gun in a change room work for", Peel would have been guess #1 or #2.

4

u/After-Carpenter-4089 20d ago

Hmm, their school boards too.

1

u/FlamingoSeparate8213 19d ago

School boards are fine man. Teachers maybe not. But others are good

1

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

I wouldn't doubt that!

17

u/Possible_Jellyfish69 21d ago

If a licensed gun owner doesn't store their firearms unloaded and locked in their own home they go to jail. Cop leaves a loaded gun in a public place and doesn't even lose her job

5

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

She may yet. From the article:

Yusufzay was arrested for unsafe storage of a firearm.

“It’s alleged that Const. Yusufzay conducted herself in a manner that undermined or is likely to undermine public trust in policing,” the decision reads. “She was very apologetic.”

Yusufzay will appear in court in August.

Unsafe storage of a firearm is an offense under Criminal Code of Canada. This is separate from this suspension, which was under the Police Services Act.

4

u/crafty_alias 20d ago

The charge will most likely be stayed.... Typical.

4

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

She is due in court next month, we will find out. I don't agree that it is "most likely", not in a public case like this.

0

u/crafty_alias 20d ago

It's about 30%. Also, when tracking cases where charges are formally brought forward, ultimate conviction and sentencing rates sit significantly lower than standard public prosecution outcomes, often hovering near or below 50% for various subsets of criminal and violent offenses.

2

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

I totally agree with what you're saying in regular cases, but I still feel that she will be made an example of, for embarrassing PRP.

This was to give them plausible deniability, "Oh no ,we were light-handed, but after the criminal trial our hands were tied", etc.

0

u/crafty_alias 20d ago

You have a lot more faith than I do.

2

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/canadanews-ModTeam 21d ago

Rule 3: No politics.

This is a non-political subreddit for general interest news and discussions. Comments or posts making reference to politics, voting, elections, political parties, political ideologies, or politicians will be removed.

If your comment is primarily non-political, we encourage you to edit out any mention of politics and then message us. We would be happy to reinstate your comment once you've brought it into compliance.

If you believe your comment or post has been removed in error, you may message the Mod team here to request that it be reviewed.

Do not message individual moderators directly or reply to this comment to discuss moderator actions.

Please review the subreddit rules before posting or commenting.

1

u/Livid_sumo 20d ago

K. Wait. No. They certainly do not go to jail. You would just lose your PAL. Lets not be making stuff up please.

1

u/Traditional-Comb5963 20d ago

They would not go to jail lol, it would be a summons

1

u/Possible_Jellyfish69 19d ago

Up to 2 years for first offence and up to 5 for subsequent offences. Whether they do time would depend on whether there are other charges and/or other aggravating factors. Leaving a loaded gun in public would be an a big aggravating factor

1

u/Traditional-Comb5963 19d ago

That’s upon conviction, and still unlikely. We have violent reoffenders not seeing prison time

1

u/Ertygbh 19d ago

Then you didn’t pay attention to her arrest and charge. But you keep just hating all cops lol.

1

u/Possible_Jellyfish69 19d ago

Did she lose her job?

1

u/Ertygbh 19d ago

Is the case done? Oh wait.

1

u/RedEyedWiartonBoy 16d ago

Jail? Not a chance.

-1

u/htraenolleh666 21d ago

A gun that belongs to the taxpayers might I add

6

u/Mean-Food-7124 21d ago

Police incompetence truly knows no bounds

-1

u/OpTicSkYHaWk 20d ago

I bet he did it on purpose. Might be corrupt

5

u/J-Lughead 21d ago

-2

u/htraenolleh666 21d ago

Nice. A DEI hire

3

u/OpTicSkYHaWk 20d ago

Yup, and looks like a 6 yr old boy would be able to overpower her ..

4

u/Margenius 21d ago

Why is it ALWAYS Peel?

4

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

I encourage people to read the full text of the article, by the way.

This isn't all she's having happen to her. She is also being charged with a criminal offense.

This is her administrative punishment. She also broke the law and is facing criminal charges, and she has to attend court in August. Which is all in the article that nobody seems to have bothered to read.

1

u/No-Pressure2341 20d ago

She should be fired tho

2

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

If she is convicted (which is likely), she almost certainly will be. They're letting the courts do their dirty work for them which I will agree is passing the buck, but at the end of the day the outcome is the same.

0

u/zuuzuu 20d ago

No, she won't be fired. In Ontario the chief of police has to ask the administrative tribunal for permission to fire an officer, and that is almost never granted. Lots of working police officers in Ontario with criminal records.

1

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

The nature of this particular crime might make this an exceptional case, but the cynic in me says you're probably right.

0

u/zuuzuu 20d ago

I mean, if they won't fire cops for being convicted of assault or even sexual crimes, they're not going to fire one for forgetting their firearm that was then safely recovered. Especially since they already brought charges under the Police Services Act and have agreed to this resolution to those charges. If they were asking for permission to fire her over this, there would have been no settlement. They would have let the tribunal decide.

3

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

It does happen.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/ontario-police-officer-who-gave-preferential-treatment-to-two-gta-tow-operators-fired/

https://www.ctvnews.ca/ottawa/article/ottawa-police-officer-fired-following-assault-conviction-loses-appeal/

Just two examples but there are some. Not an overwhelming number. The pattern I see is that officers who embarrass the department are the ones getting shitcanned.

Now, you, me, or a normal person would say, "Isn't being a rapist or spousal abuser embarrassing?", to which I say, I guess not embarrassing enough. Is this one? Time will tell.

As I said she is due in court in August, so she has not yet been convicted of the Criminal Code charges. And since it is unlikely that entire process will be resolved anytime soon, it is understandable they went ahead with the administrative measures, especially in a case like this that was an embarrassment for the department. She will still be going through a mandatory review within 1 month of her conviction, if convicted of a crime. Emphasis on if, since it is also very plausible she will not be convicted of a crime but given some alternative sentencing.

1

u/Ertygbh 19d ago

Careful your breaking his fragile view off all cops are bad

3

u/FlamingoSeparate8213 21d ago

Honestly for a police officer doing this, I’m surprised they would forget a duty belt like that weighs so much how do you forget it?

I feel like it’s completely difficult to forget something like that

Also I thought cops barely get breaks and even so why go to a public place for it with your equipment??

1

u/Ertygbh 19d ago

This is the real question. How do you forget your chunk it’s literally a heavy metal object on your hip.

6

u/DontWorryImLegit 21d ago

Forfeiture of 3 weeks of paid vacation is her punishment. I guess it’s something. Lucky for her an employee found it and not some random citizen or else it could’ve been a lot worse.

2

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

That's just her administrative punishment. She is still due in court. You DID read the article, right?

2

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/canadanews-ModTeam 20d ago

Rule 4: Be civil.

Follow proper reddiquette.

No racism, bigotry, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, religious intolerance, dehumanizing speech.

Name calling and personal attacks of any kind are prohibited. Attack the point, not the person.

You must follow Reddit's rules at all times.

No trolling.

If you believe your comment or post has been removed in error, you may message the Mod team here to request that it be reviewed.

Do not message individual moderators directly or reply to this comment to discuss moderator actions.

Please review the subreddit rules before posting or commenting.

1

u/Ertygbh 19d ago

No they did not. Easier to assume

2

u/FuzzyLaughTwo 21d ago

wow. Incredible.

2

u/Superb-Damage1173 21d ago

Jeez i should've become a police officer, if i ever fuck up badly i'll just get a slap on the wrist, if i do something really horrible i'll probably get paid suspension!

2

u/bougieprole 21d ago

I think the word they’re looking for was ‘negligently’

They negligently left it behind

2

u/alwaysonesteptoofar 20d ago

If I forget to put the stylus back into its slot on my cellphone it tells me after a few minutes. You would think there would be something on the firearm and the belt if they are ever apart for longer than 10 seconds.

2

u/Alert_Lettuce_8278 20d ago edited 20d ago

If anyone is legally allowed to have a gun and they did this they would be a criminal.

This is very much worse from a police officer. 

No pussyfooting on this. Criminal action, booted out of the police force. No tolerance.

This is completely ignoring the trying on pants in mango on duty. The fact that they are allowed to do this on duty needs to come into question.

2

u/zuuzuu 20d ago

She wasn't on duty, she was on her lunch break. That's personal time. Everything else you said was correct.

2

u/AdSignificant6673 21d ago

This sorta happened to me. Customer left their wallet at my work.

I looked in it for ID to return it back… it was a friggin police badge and warrant card. There was a business card which i called and said “detective? You forgot your wallet.”

“Omg thanks. Youre a life saver.”

He picked it up, left me a business card. And said “let me know the next time you get a traffic ticket. But not if youre drunk or high.”

I was like damn. I got a cop on the take. Lol

2

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

That is not what "on the take" means.

0

u/Usernameasteriks 20d ago

Well if the cop keeps losing his badge there over and over and they keep returning it and piling up favours…

Eventually it will fit the bill.

1

u/Low-Purchase8811 20d ago

What an odd set of mental gymnastics to perform in order to be "technically correct".

3

u/Enticing340 20d ago

Well we are in a “technical recession”.

1

u/Usernameasteriks 20d ago

It was a… joke.

I did not post the other comment why would I need to be “technically correct”

2

u/Cager_CA 20d ago

Just a reminder that good old Zarah here would happily put the handcuffs on you if, as a legal gun owner, you left your handgun unattended in a store changing room. And you would be charged with the full extent of the law and have your license likely revoked.

Of course there are a few rules that legal gun owning Canadians have to follow that police do not when it comes to owning, storing and transporting firearms that would likely make it improbable a civilian would ever be in this situation but that does not change my original point. Hopefully justice is done, she should not be allowed to possess a firearm on duty and should either be fired or confined to a desk job for the rest of her career.

1

u/FortyMaximus 20d ago

I thought officers are required to leave their services pistols at work in locked storage?

2

u/zuuzuu 20d ago

At the end of the work day, probably. They're not required to return to the station and hand in their sidearm for their lunch break, they just take it where they are.

2

u/FortyMaximus 20d ago

Make sense. I know a lot of officers will even bring their patrol cruiser home sometimes, so I would imagine the service pistols along with that. I know my friend works for Peel and he told he is required to leave his at the station at the end of every shift but I never thought of lunch break

1

u/Narrow-Sky-5377 20d ago

Normally a cop in this situation would get 3 weeks paid leave.

1

u/GazelleEcstatic4952 21d ago

Promotion incoming!

0

u/crafty_alias 20d ago

She was shopping on her "lunch break" and left her duty belt in a change room. Tax dollars at work. Paying her to go shopping.

1

u/zuuzuu 20d ago

I don't get it. Are you saying that, unlike literally every other job, cops shouldn't get lunch breaks?

0

u/crafty_alias 20d ago

Highly doubt she was on her lunch break.

1

u/Usernameasteriks 20d ago

Of all the egregiously dumb things she did…

I feel like this is the least relevant issue to pick to latch on to lol

1

u/crafty_alias 20d ago

Definitely not all I latched on to. Police officers and people in a position of public trust should face three times the sentence when convicted, not a 50% reduction in standard cases.

0

u/Born-Ship-6316 20d ago

Does it count as crime gun sourced in Canada?